Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary got 55% in Michigan/ Barack got 55% in S.C. but Barack actually had opponents in SC. . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:29 PM
Original message
Hillary got 55% in Michigan/ Barack got 55% in S.C. but Barack actually had opponents in SC. . .
. . .that is not a good sign for Hillary. Even uncommitted got 40% in MI, but Hillary only got 27% in SC. Maybe Florida might be something to look at after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting analysis but if anyone wants to seat MI's delegates they
better actually redo the vote.

I never got to vote for my guy. All I could do was check "uncommitted". It sucked.

Nice trick of Hillary to leave her name on the ballot. Nice trick indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The other candidates removed their names, its a free country and they exercised that freedom
The Dem party had the opportunity to submit a bill in Michigan to require that their names remain on the ballot. Didn't do it. The candidates also had the option of submitting the necessary paperwork to become write in candidates. Didn't do that either.

Were you aware that it was the Republican in the Michigan legislature who submitted the bill to change the primary date?

Blaming one candidate or even one party for this fiasco is about as ignorant as the freepers blaming the Democrats for 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. you put so much spin in there your ball is in the gutter.
and if Hillary really wanted this to be fair from the beginning (which she didn't), she would have protested the situation all along (which she didn't).

This is a simple case of her grasping for power in a cynical ploy.

I reject the postics of cynicism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. IThese issues were in every major newspaper in Michigan. Read it yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. And S.C. actually has delegates, which are most important. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Uncommitted" was the only way for me to express my support for Edwards in the MI primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. No one has real opponents yet
this is the primary race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Barak and Edwards supporters voted uncommitted and Hillary killed them both
Had they left their names on the ballot they would have been destroyed. Then they acted like there was an "anti-Hillary" vote with the uncommitted. In fact, what we really had was a pro-Obama and Edwards vote. And a pro-Hillary vote that was more then Edwards and Obama got together.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You are doing it wrong
Democratic turnout was low because voters knew their votes didn't count in the big election. Many Edwards and Obama voters could have voted for Clinton because they didn't care or have Hilllary as a number two choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. WRONG! See post #6...
We live in this forsaken state and if their names would have been on the ballot, she would have come in a distant and I do mean DISTANT 3rd. Most of the folks I talk to in this state (and it's quite a few as I travel a lot with my job) do not like her one iota.

There are a lot of ticked off people here right now, and if she pulls a fast one to get our delegates after we all had to vote uncommitted, she can go to hell in a handbasket - let me re phrase that is language she would understand, she can go to China on a slow boat....one way.

The primary was a travesty. I haven't lived in MI but for 10 years (and counting the days until I can leave!) and this state is so messed up with voting.

To vote, you have to declare your party. Now that in itself would be fine if I could just grab a ballot, go to my little closet and 'x' in who I want....but NO, not here in the fine state of Shitigan....you have to ASK the pollworker for what ballot you want. Since when is it their damn business what party I am????? Secret ballot my fat arse.

Uncommitted to Edwards......and again, if he and Obama would have been on the ballot, HRC would have been toast and her little political machine knew it and 'adjusted' the rules.

A politcal machine with lots to lose can be an ugly animal... and her machine has many tenacles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I'd believe you if turnout had been higher.
I've never seen turnout that low in my precinct. The only ones who voted were the lockstep party faithful and those of us pissed off enough to send a message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. um uncommitted wasn't split up between two candidates nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC