Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did women break for HRC in NH so much more than Iowa?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:44 AM
Original message
Why did women break for HRC in NH so much more than Iowa?
Was it organization? Was it advertising/robocalls/mailers? Did Obama missstep somehow and we missed it. Was it a backlash out of fear women would be denied an obvious opportunity to have a female president? This was clearly a deciding factor. Something changed. I am just trying to figure out why it happened.

Any ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. ready camera,, action, tears on cue. That's a take.
print.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think tearing up was the least bit staged.
Shew was tired andpeople get emotional under stress. Itg was a completely genuine moment.


There may have been somepostivie result for her showing some vunerability. but if the episode gaveher a bump it was more like back lash against the media presenting it in sexist terms.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I disagree.
Hillary has almost never shown emotion, yet she's able to muster up some the day before the most important election of her life.

Sorry. Not buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. When I get that emotional, I can't speak. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Insulting to women. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. that's what the 'experts' say..
everyone saw her showing emotions and changed their mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. Ed-Zackery...that staged moment, plus the MSM pile-on...
...got them wimmin folk all riled up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. IMO, it was the peer pressure of a caucus that was in play, go along to keep the peace and
and the time of the caucus(7PM). Meal time and child playtime and sitter issues etc. When you set a time certain for a vote you automaticlly disallow whole groups of voters. The caucus is a bad system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. The tearful moment
She was abused unmercifully by the media and dissed by Edwards and hectored by misogynists to iron their shirts. I am all for Obama, but I was extremely disturbed by it all. The women's vote solidified around her, because why should any woman have to take that sexist shit, especially when she's running an already tremendously difficult course to be the most powerful person in the world? I think mainly that's what turned it. But Hillary also realized that she had been complacent about women in Iowa, where she lost that key vote. She knew she had to reach out to secure what she had and amplify that base with younger women. She was smart enough to know she had to do that and did it quickly and efficiently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. I think you have a point there.
I really don't like all of HRC's triangulations, but, I admit, it would be nice for my 7-month-old daughter to start her life with a woman as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. You know what i think


I think there was so much tinkering in Iowa with voters moving around under directions from campaigns and interference from people and a candidate telling people to put certain others as second choices that when you do caucuses like Iowa, it does cause a certain skew of % votes. Nh was possibly the real deal vote, a straight primary. Maybe Iowa was the anomally.

Theres many things about NH that were clear, women voters went hugely for Clinton and she scored best in
the 20 to 30 age range. So the age thing was not all Obama's. The other major break was that democrats said by a wide margin, policy and experience outweighed likeability. There is also the 3% of voters who were non white women and they also went by over 50% to Clinton. What does this say about Obama?

Pretty interesting data that has many people scratching their heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Spot on
This is a VOTE - not an in public hectored popularity contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I think that's MUCH more likely
than any "sympathy vote" theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Or could it be that women just can't be generalized?
Is it possible that women in different parts of this country tend to feel differently? Or is that asking too much of the "lesser sex"?

Listen women didn't vote for Hillary in Iowa because, in general, people in the midwest just don't like her. Nothing changed. The way women vote in Iowa simply tells you nothing about what women in NH think of her.

Maybe it was because she wore that pink scarf yesterday. That probably won a lot of women over :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Possibly but that suggest she will not play well in the south
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Yes, I predict that she will not play well in the South.
I predict that Obama will take SC and probably NV (we'll see what these new union endorsements for Obama mean)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. I think her campaign was more organized in NH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
16. Hill knows all there is to know about the Crying Game
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 11:26 AM by JackORoses
the Crying Game
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. Back lash against cruel anti-women type attacks on Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. Sympathy and nice weather. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
21. Terry McAuliffe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
22. I think it was that Obama Girl.. she's the worst damn thing and she was
everywhere the day before election on t.v...

Or because the demographic in NH is that there really aren't that many young people left, and the one's who stay are the hardy type.. that love their guns and hickish ways and won't vote for a scary black man? who knows.. who cares.. its one tiny little state that really sucks... I've never cared for NH.. and was much happier that I grew up in VT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. Please define what you mean by BREAK
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 11:43 AM by Maribelle
Older women in New Hampshire were solidly behind Hillary since the beginning, not even based on any advertising, robocalls, or mailers.

It was not backlash.

It was not fear.

What you are failing to grasp here is: the intelligence of your typical New Hampshire woman is based on the application of her experiences in dealing with the dynamics of her evolving role.

When "you go girl" was first uttered decades ago, they went. They have roared with the best of their breed. And as this century rolls out, they refuse to rest on their laurels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
24. Because the "men are ganging up on poor Hillary" card was played.
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 11:46 AM by Skwmom
You know, the Murdoch press was credited with the - H.C. is in a Panic- and - Yesterday,She’s so Yesterday - front page press. This (along with the H.C. was piled upon in the debate) is now being credited with helping women rush to the polls in defense of H.C. On Morning Joe (I think it was Morning Joe) it was reported that the Clinton team had a long memory and would not forget the treatment (I guess the media has been put on notice – be nice to Hillary or else your future access will be limited – hmm… now who does this remind me of…… anybody? Now the daily kos blog is promoting "hands off of Hillary.." ). Furthermore, they said that people on the left were worried about the relationship between the Clintons and Murdoch but now … well it was inferred - what’s there to worry about. I also heard this compared to the incident in N.Y. where the voters rallied behind the woman candidate who the male candidate had tried to intimidate.

When I saw the headline “Yesterday” on a record I was a bit puzzled. The words to Yesterday go something like – yesterday, all my troubles seemed so far away… (hmmm.. you should long for the good old days of Clinton).. oh how I believe in yesterday…. I guess the Murdoch press was failed to realize that such “attacks” would rally the older voters and women voters in New Hampshire.

It’s amazing how these incidents brought the women to the polls for Hillary. It really couldn’t have gone any better if they had planned it.

I read on another post that the Iron My Shirt guys were from a right wing jock station. Oh well, they do say that politics make strange bedfellows. I kind of wonder if the Bush guy (Romney) will tap Jeb Bush as VP and we'll see a Romney-Bush vs Clinton-Edwards battle.


Before someone posts the "Bill Clinton is a political genius" post just let me say that it hardly takes a genius to plan and carryout such a manipulation. All it takes is someone willing to do anything to gain political power. Divide and conquer is a tried and true strategy and a sure fire way to ensure that people will rally around a person just because they put a D or R in front of their name. Republican vs Democrat has worked so far - why not add men vs women, the older generation vs the younger generation, and black vs white to the mix.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC