wrote (she wrote more than one). The one she wanted to ask, on Yucca Mountain, was a non-starter because the candidates had already discussed that issue. Her other question--HER other question, mind you--was that 'gem' that ended the debate.
She could have said the magic word. And the magic word is
NO.
The other magic words are "Get someone else to ask a fluffy bullshit ender."
There was no forcing involved, unless the knife or gun were concealed "off camera."
Old Mike of Future Majority, if he really wants to be a Future Journalist, might try getting those pesky FACTS straight before calling out the kettle, there...
He starts with a lie, and he ENDS with a lie. That's not too confidence inspiring. It's called blame-shifting, too. I am left ...UNIMPRESSED.
This really came to a head this weekend when, less than 24 hours after forcing a young UNLV student to ask Hillary Clinton whether she preferred Diamonds or Pearls,.....Moreover, and this is very important, you REALLY need to stop force-feeding us these fluff questions in national forums (see: Mac vs. PC and Diamonds vs. Pearls). If you are going to say that we are frivolous, you shouldn’t be enabling - or worse, instigating - that behavior. This habit is doing nothing to build your credibility with a younger audience that is already abandoning you for the internet. So following this rule is not only good for Democracy, it is good for your bottom line.
He could have had a good piece there, but hanging it on a student who was too weak-minded to turn down her fifteen minutes of fame just makes one disregard everything he has to say--even the 'genuine' items.