Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WARNING! Hillary is the B Word is the “Gore is a Liar” of 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:51 AM
Original message
WARNING! Hillary is the B Word is the “Gore is a Liar” of 2008
Today the RNC officially unveiled if official 2008 presidential election strategy. Taking a page from the 2000 and 2004 elections, they are not going to focus on the issues, since issues like Iraq and Global Warming and Health Care and the Deficit will kill them in November. They are going to base their campaign on three little words that their toadies in the corporate media will repeat and elaborate on and allude to throughout the rest of the campaign, unless Democrats put a stop to it now.

For those who do not recall what the mainstream media did to Al Gore with its “Gore is Liar” campaign, please refer to this classic Rolling Stone article, “The Press v. Al Gore.”

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/5920188/the_press_vs_al_gore

Note that with the exception of Ceci Connelly who lied once too often about Gore being a liar and got herself demoted to reporting medical news at the WaPo, the rest of the conspirators did very well for themselves and are in a position to do it again. (To find out what they are doing now, just do a Google) I have already caught several of them engaging in “Edwards is a Phony” or “Hillary is B___” attacks in their current jobs this year. George Stephanapoulos at ABC is the worst offender.

However, today’s attack at a McCain meeting qualifies as the official unveiling, since it is the first time that a woman (the RNC selected their man well) has stood up on national TV (all the news networks made sure of that---reporting on an “outrage” is such a clever way of propagating an outrage) and uttered the word in a room full of chuckling Republicans. The only thing that we, as Democrats can be grateful for is the writers’ strike, which will keep Letterman, Leno, Stewart, SNL and the rest from repeating the clip over and over and over again. (This was why I objected to the SNL characterization of Hillary in a bride’s outfit as a witch. For about a year, I have detected a tendency in the mainstream media to lay the groundwork for the Hillary is the B Word campaign. Stuff like the SNL sketch feeds into the national myth.)


Meanwhile, Judith Regan has revealed that News Corp tried to compel her to lie to government investigators, an accusation, which, if true, should result in felony charges against Roger Ailes of Fox 0if we had a real Justice Department). Now that is news. Plus, Rudy released his first TV ad, which is probably full of lies, since he is a serial liar, but I do not see the press going over it with a fine tooth comb. (Hint, check the part about New York being the crime capital of the country. I seem to remember places like Houston, Atlanta and DC having that distinction at one time or another before 2000. Could Rudy be basing this claim on total number of crimes or on white collar crimes as opposed to the usual violent crime rate that people usually cite when they declare some city the “crime capital of the country”?)

Those of us who remember “Gore is a liar” know where this is going. The members of the press whose bosses want something from a Republican administration---relaxed media ownership rules of the type which FCC Chair Martin has just proposed to the benefit of News Corp, the Tribune Company and probably a few others, or maybe an upcoming merger that will create a mega-monopoly---will start attaching adjectives to Hillary like “shrill”, “cold”, “impersonal”. Her “lack of warmth” will be an issue (as if Rudy exudes warm fuzzies). News Corp will pay some old girl friend of Bill’s to say that he complained that Hilary did not give him the love and support he needed at home. She wasn’t “woman” enough for him.

This activity will step up exponentially after the nominating convention. The RNC does not want to tip its hand too soon, and risk throwing the nomination towards one of her competitors, like Edwards.

There are a number of ways to fight back. The only unacceptable strategy is to do like Gore and do nothing. He wanted to be a statesman and stay above the fray, but in the end “Gore is a liar” hurt him terribly. It made sensible Democrats vote for Ralph Nader, because they thought Gore was as full of hot air as W. It made it easy for the press to laugh at Gore when he challenged Katherine Harris and the obvious election fraud that had taken place in Florida in 2000. “Oh, that's just Al. You can't believe anything he says. He is such a liar.” Never underestimate the ability of Americans to be suckered by a well run public relations campaign.

The first way I would fight back is find out everything there is to know about the white haired woman who decided to introduce the RNC’s newest campaign slogan. Maybe there is no history there. Maybe there is. It is always good to investigate.

I would also bombard John McCain with outraged emails asking how he can call a question that contains a sexist slur “good”. And, keep eyes and ears open for mainstream media pundits, like Tweety who begin repeating the word as humorous. They are trying to desensitize the public. At its inception, calling a sitting Vice President a “liar” was pretty bold. They had to get people softened up. They will have to get Americans softened up to the B word, too. They will start by having women reporters discuss how the word is acceptable when used by women about other women. Or not. Taking a righteous, feminist stance can be just another way of keeping the topic in the public eye if you include a right wing nut job in the debate. Right wingers will start splashing it across their signs, and these signs will get prominent display on TV. It will be Ann Coulters’ new favorite word.

Every time this happens, the news station needs to be inundated with angry protests. Think Imus and the college basketball players. This is the first woman with a real chance to be elected president, and they are attacking her as women in positions of authority have always been attacked---for having opinions and disagreeing with men and not apologizing for it. Individual journalists who decide to use Hillary is the B Word as a way to further their careers need to be made to realize that enough angry email from the news consumer public can also ruin a journalist’s career. Make them wish that they had a job as good as medical reporter for the Washington Post.

Imagine what a difference we could have made in 2000, if people had fought back against the press as it savaged Gore. There is no need to censor the press. Just use our free market ability to buy what we like, boycott what we do not like, let sponsors know what we really do not like.

Oh, and do not forget to have a sense of humor. The B word can be turned on its head in some very funny ways to make campaign slogans that show that we in the Democratic Party are not afraid of being called uppidy women.

Another Bitch for Universal Healthcare. Too Busy Voting to Make Cookies. Strong Women are not Afraid of Peace.




















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. But would you want to have a beer with her?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gore Vidal met her in the 1990s and said he really liked her. More than Bill.
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 01:29 AM by McCamy Taylor
http://moviexpress.tripod.com/blog/

Back in the heady days of President Bill Clinton’s first term, that most acerbic critic of US politics, the self-exiled writer Gore Vidal, welcomed Hillary and entourage to his Ravello home when the Clintons visited Italy in 1994. He recounted the meeting in his memoir, Palimpsest. “Hillary is small, stocky, with large round blue eyes, a beautiful smile, and an easy manner…” Vidal was clearly stricken, and claims that when Hillary said on leaving that, ‘Meeting you has been the high point of this trip…’ “Radiant blue eyes looked up into mine. Yes, I thought, I am now ready to replace Warren Christopher as Secretary of State,” until she added “the deflationary coda—‘for my Mother.’”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Having a beer with someone is what got us into
this world of chit we are in today. The American people are looking for someone with enough knowledge and experience that can bring back the respectibility that America once had around the world. This go round there will be none of this " would like to have a beer with him" crap. We are in need of a strong leader and no one on the right side of the table can bring about it because they want to continue the cowboy deplomacy of warhardon bush.
I support HRC as I do believe she is the one person that can bring about this change in foreign relations. She has already said she would use her husband and other statesmen and stateswomen to help in this effort.Plus, one cannot be strong abroad unless you have a strong a vibrate America.

Ben David

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's for sure. As I keep saying, it should be
who we'd want to have a cup of tea with.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Great post, recommended. Let them try and ruin HRC with the B word.
75% of women in NY voted for her, including millions of Republicans. And women make up 54% of the voting electorate. Any Rethug who antagonizes them does it at his peril -- and millions of women who don't care for HRC are strong women who would resent her being treated that way. If the B word starts getting thrown around, I predict a Hillary landslide.

That is, IF she is the Democratic nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. If they do, it will backfire.
Just like calling Bush stupid actually made him more sympathetic to regular folks, calling Hillary a bitch will make her look like she is being mistreated. People will tend to have a negative reaction to the person calling the names, IMO. Hillary is not my first choice, but I think if the R's do this, it will put her over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It will definitely make her more sympathetic to women, including GOP women.
Not necessarily to men. So far the polls do not show a lot of GOP women crossing over, but in private life I hear them talking about doing it. I just think that they are not ready to commit to it to a pollster. Since many professional women have been called that and worse, they will identify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm beyond disappointed in McCain!!!!
They became close since she joined the Armed Services Committee and bonded while taking various trips abroad. The Clintons consider him a friend and he allows some nasty woman to call his colleague such a rude name???? At the very least he should have told her that her comment was disrespectful and inappropriate. It's sad to se how a decent man has fallen so low in his craven quest for votes!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. McCain's decency checked out awhile ago
He's become irrelevant in his own party, and is now a desperate man scavaging for votes and money. That's what happens when you allow someone to smear and slander you as badly as the Bushies did to him in 2000, and then spend eight years kissing his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. 2 things.
1) I wouldn't lift a finger to fight for her unless/until she wins the primaries.

2) I doubt she needs our help as much as you think she does. She'd rather have his:



It doesn't mean that I approve of the tactics. But I'm only willing to fight as hard for her as she is willing to fight for me. Not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morereason Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't know if I agree with the analysis
I never saw the "Gore is a Liar" impact in 2000. I don't think it had the impact that the article attributes to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. I agree
It was more "Gore Is Unlikable", which the press DID harp on, while allowing The Bush Machine to spin his bumbling stupidity into some likable down home good old boy routine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. My mama told me a "bitch" is a woman who can't be conrolled by a man!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. Elton John: The Bitch is back
I'm a bitch, I'm a bitch
Oh the bitch is back
Stone cold sober as a matter of fact
I can bitch, I can bitch
because I'm better than you
It's the way that I move
The things that I do

The bitch
The bitch
is back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. The anti-Hillary people will function as the Republican "fifth column" at DU. How creepy is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. How disingenuous!
You are implying that Democrats who do not support Hillary for the nomination are Republicans. That is such crap!

It works both ways. Would criticism of Obama or Edwards mean you are a Republican? Hardly. And we see spirited debate for and against all of our candidates.

The difference is that nobody is implying opposing Obama or Edwards is some sort of Republican fifth column! But with Hillary, opposition to her nomination must mean you are a Republican. Again, bunk!

Democrats who oppose Clinton want someone else to run AGAINST the Republicans. Get it, yet? Many don't think Clinton is liberal enough, and others are anguished by her similarities to Republican policies and support for the Iraq War, etc.

Fact is, Hillary is the candidate the Reps MOST WANT to run against. They know there is a lot of built-in negatives with Hillary. She is the one candidate who can most unite their party to vote against someone who is considered an enemy. This bitch meme just shows how easily it will be with Hillary to plant memes about her that will hurt her among undecideds.

So to imply that critics of Hilllary's candidacy for the nomination are Republicans is as wrong as it is wrong-headed.

No candidate is above criticism or inspection. Holding a candidate up as being unable to criticise and to pass off critics as "haters" are chapters in the George Bush strategy book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. There is nothing wrong with criticizing any of the candidates.
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 11:03 AM by RichGirl
But....not voting for them (whether it's third party or not voting at all) is a vote for the republican. There is a lot of criticism toward Obama and Edwards but I haven't heard anyone say they won't vote for them if they win the nom. Yet many have said that about Hillary.

I don't know the reason. But, statistically 55% of ALL married men say they will not vote for Hillary. If you are in this catagory and a Democrat you need to do some deep soul searching.

On edit: Regarding the soul searching I was using the generic "you" not you particularily. Any married man who is obsessively apposed to Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. I would vote for the Democratic Nominee....
I just think we can do better candidate wise, both on the issues and with regards to actually winning in November.

However, we do have to consider that if we don't nominate someone who holds true to Democratic values, some are going to vote for Nader in disgust. I am not saying this is right and I won't do that, however I don't think there is much doubt that more people will vote Green and/or Nader if Hillary is the nominee. In fall I will be out there arguing for them to come home to the party, but we are not in fall yet, and there still is time to nominate a candidate who would not be so divisive within the party as Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Creepy and unfortunate...
One can clearly see the repuke tactics described in the OP right here in THIS thread. Me ? I'd much rather post this pic of happier times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. So the question becomes
are you outraged at Mcains snicker? are you outraged that rethugs would allow this to propagate? are you outraged at what the rethugs truly think of Hillary? can you see yet who the rethugs want us to rally behind?

We Democrats are more emotional than any rethug. We care for The American public. we tend to be emotional in our choices. It is High time we treat the rethugs without emotion, without care, and nominate whom they are most afraid of. whom they know they will loose to.

I believe thats Joe Biden. the rethugs know Joe will carry the day if given the chance. Just about All independents of course all Democrats. and dare I say more than a few Republicans will vote for Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I think it wiser to nominate someone they are unprepared to oppose...
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 07:58 AM by earthlover
They have invested all their energy into opposing Hillary. It would be funny as hell to see them have to adjust to opposing someone else!
They WANT to run against Hillary. I say, don't give them what they want!~

As to Biden, he would crush them in November! Experience. Toughness. Foreign Policy savvy. Looks Presidential.

And he is not who the Reps have spent all their energy running against!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Thank You
along with "I say, don't give them what they want!" might I add EVER AGAIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. Well good luck finding someone like that.
It doesn't matter who the Democrats run the GOP has already got contingency plans ready to go. I'll sum them up for you.

Hillary - Bitch
Obama - Hussein
Edwards - rich
Biden - plagiarizer
Kucinich - UFO's
Richardson - Mexican
Dodd - East Coast Liberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. Yes the Reps will try to smear any Dem candidate....but why nominate the one
who would be the easiest to smear? the one who has already been smeared for years and as a result many already have formed their opinions of and won't change? I include in the last group people who might otherwise vote Democratic. About half of all potential voters won't vote for Hillary under any circumstances. Do.The.Math.

Just look at last week! We had Hillary flip flopping in the debate, tip-gate and plant-gate! In one week! This doesn't even begin to tap the long list of memes about Hillary that have already been planted over the years.

Wait until the Rep slime machine gets going. And that would be when/if Hillary was assured the nomination. They are licking their chops.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. Anyway to turn this around in her favor?
"Bitch" is one of those words which can be both a compliment and/or an insult. Any way to pair that word up with another so that Hillary and Co. can triangulate the term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Well, if anyone can triangulate, it would be Hillary!
The Master Triangulator!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Hey, you know, this may be her moment to shine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
23. Wasn't there a Democratic party MACHINE in place to counter the spin in 2000?
2002? 2004?

I know I paid into that machine for decades....why did it take a break from 2000-2005?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. The message came from the commercial press, not just the RNC.
The Democratic Party can not take on the commercial news media single handedly. That requires the clout of the news consumer. This is why I suggest that Democratic Voters keep their eyes peeled for all the RNCs nasty little slogans---"Edwards is a phony", "Hillary is a bitch", and the rest---and respond to them as the partisan attacks which they are. If particular reporters begin to write stories whose whole purpose is to support these lies---like John Solomon's series of tales about Edward's house and hair---they need to be bitch-slapped (now there is a fine term!) by the consumers of the news. The corporate media has been very successful in keeping Edwards down with their dual strategy of mostly ignore him and when you write about him tell some story about how he is a phony. We have seen Stephanapoulos, Couric do it. Lots of anonymous people have done it. Now, people all over DU post it.

This is a taste of what is to come for Hillary after the nomination (if she is the nominee).

I am surprised that anyone can write that "Gore is a liar" did not affect the 2000 campaign. People in the US have amazingly short memories. Gore was treated as a laughing stock once Connelly and her like started in on him. No one took any of his policies seriously. At the same time, the press ignored all of Dumbya's lies and past crimes. We know now that the corporate media had been promised lots of favors (mergers, media rule relaxations etc.)which explains their bias. The press created the illusion that Al Gore was a pompous windbag who was no better than George W. Bush the idiot son of an ex-president. This caused people who should have known better like Michael Moore to campaign for Ralph Nader. Moore is a smart man. If he could fall for a media trick like that, it must have been pretty damn persuasive. Gore was one of the most liberal candidates the Dems had run in a long time. He would have protected the media from monopolies. He would have cleaned up the environment. Business knew that and feared him. That is why they sent the press after him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Media targets certain Dems for takedowns - but I don't think they target all Dems
and not the ones they KNOW will side with them in the long run.

But those they KNOW will break up their power they will distort to the point that even Democrats will join in the lies against them.

Like Gore. Like Kerry. And the Dem "MACHINE" stayed quiet about it.

Kerry Seeks to Reverse FCC's "Wrongheaded Vote"

Commission Decision May Violate Laws Protecting Small Businesses; Kerry to File Resolution of Disapproval

Monday, June 2, 2003

WASHINGTON - Senator John Kerry today announced plans to file a "Resolution of Disapproval" as a means to overturn today's decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to raise media ownership caps and loosen various media cross-ownership rules.

Kerry will soon introduce the resolution seeking to reverse this action under the Congressional Review Act and Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act on the grounds that the decision may violate the laws intended to protect America's small businesses and allow them an opportunity to compete.

As Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Kerry expressed concern that the FCC's decision will hurt localism, reduce diversity, and will allow media monopolies to flourish. This raises significant concerns about the potential negative impacts the decision will have on small businesses and their ability to compete in today's media marketplace.

In a statement released earlier today regarding the FCC's decision, Kerry said:

"Nothing is more important in a democracy than public access to debates and information, which lift up our discourse and give Americans an opportunity to make honest informed choices. Today's wrongheaded vote by the Republican members of the FCC to loosen media ownership rules shows a dangerous indifference to the consolidation of power in the hands of a few large entities rather than promoting diversity and independence at the local level. The FCC should do more than rubber stamp the business plans of narrow economic interests.

"Today's vote is a complete dereliction of duty. The Commissioners are well aware that these rules greatly influence the competitive structure of the industry and protect the public's access to multiple sources of information and media. It is the Commission's responsibility to ensure that the rules serve our national goals of diversity, competition, and localism in media. With today's vote, they shirked that responsibility and have dismissed any serious discussion about the impact of media consolidation on our own democracy."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. As backup that there is something to this
Earlier today, I looked at the chart labeled "media" on Newsmeat, I went through the names - and found that in the first half of the names - only one donated to Kerry before March 2004, when he effectively clinched the nomination. This included many who had given to earlier Kerry campaigns (so it wasn't likely personal). Most had given to multiple other 2004 people. I ran out of time, but I intend to continue to look at this. (Given that many gave to Edwards and Gephardt and to Dean - it couldn't have been anger that he was anti-war or that he voted for the IWR. )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
24. Hillary was labeled the B word by the pugs back in 1992
Probably somewhere about the time of the Tammy Wynette comment or the baking cookies deal. I think this train left the station about fifteen years ago. This has been the mantra ever since people thought Hillary might have designs on running someday, and all you need to look at is a guy like Chris Matthews, who seems obsessed with her.

One other problem with the article is the objection to the SNL portrayal of her. I don't think SNL or any comedy show (If that's what you call them now) has ever been real kind to her, nor should they. Political parody is what the late night shows are all about. They talk about Bush openly as a drooling idiot and a petulant child. You can't cheer that, and then complain when they hit your side again. My hope is that if she is the nominee, skits like that have about as much impact on the electorate as any done about Bush, which seemed to be none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Bush is a Moron does not hurt him, because Americans distrust eggheads
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 12:52 PM by McCamy Taylor
and they sort of like having the Village Idiot for a president. We learned that from Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon. They distrusted Tricky Dick and were always ready to think the worst of him. However, when Reagan accepted responsibility for shit like Iran-Contra no one took him seriously, because they knew he was out of the loop, i.e too dumb.

Americans want a not too bright, nice , sincere president who will whip out the guns and fight to protect them when their comfortable lifestyle is in danger.

The thing that hurt Bush the worst was when he didn't care about NOLA and then when he admitted that he had LIED and SPIED and TORTURED.

That said, having been burned by Dumbya this time around, Americans are going to make like zombies in 2008. They will be looking for some brains.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
29. It would be interesting to know the connections the ***** who introduced the new slogan
I wonder just who she is connected to and maybe we should know about her past as well. Maybe she is a b**** as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsRedacted Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. I did my senior thesis at Northwestern on the etymology of the word bitch
I'm gonna have to dig it out of the files.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ideagarden Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
34. Gore wanted to run his Hedge fund
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 01:10 PM by ideagarden
and Hillary got too much from the military industrial complex to stop the war. She's mad with power and will not restore our constitution. Although she might not be a bitch, she should not be in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
35. In Feb 2008, I posted at Kos that MSM was gonna use "Edwards is a Phony"
in order to shoot down his campaign during the primary, because, just like in 2004, the GOP does not want to run against a Southern White male (shades of Clinton and Carter). Eight months later, how many people do you see posting "Edwards is a phony" or some variation of this here at DU where people ought to know better? This is proof of how insidious and effective this kind of concerted media attack can be.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/2/8/1319/06023

Read what I posted and then review the interviews that people like Katie Couric and George Stephanopoulos did over this last year and see if it did not unfold just the way I predicted for Edwards. It will turn out the same for Hillary. And if we nominate Obama, the day after the convention, the press will suddenly have an "Oh my god, he is a BLACK man" moment followed by three solid months of "They are coming to rape your daughter!" And they have similar smears lined up any other possible nominee. Hillary and Bill, being the most seasoned campaigners, are probably in the best position to fight back.

We, as Democrats and as news consumers must do out part. Sponsors will listen if we express outrage. Especially since the slurs against Hillary (and against Obama and Richardson, if they come) will be sexist and racist.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
36. Disgusting bumper sticker I saw on a pickup truck this past week - -
"Life's already a bitch. Don't elect one!"

That's the attitude we're up against, folks. Ack!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichDem10 Donating Member (644 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Unfortunately the slogan will stick (no pun intended)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. "Another B*tch for Universal Healthcare"
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 10:49 PM by McCamy Taylor
"Another B*tch Opposed to Torture" "Another B*tch for Kids Healthcare."

Bumper stickers and buttons like these would make hay of the GOP's campaign of words by pointing out that the Democratic platform is much kinder and more humane than the policies of the Republicans, which really are--face it---down right nasty and wicked.

The key is focusing on issues in which the Democrats are taking a populist stand.

Do them in pink and lavender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
42. For non-Hillary supporters who were offended, join NOW
then let the John McCain campaign know that you join the National Organization of Women to protest his campaigns sexism.

http://www.now.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
43. Rudy asked his response about "B word" NOT "Regan/Kerik/NewsCorp"
today at a press conference, according to Keith Olbermann on Countdown. That means that the Mainstream Media knows that the Show has already started and that the name of the show is Hillary is a Bitch and that every question and every story is going to be about this topic, even if Rudy is the subject of a $100million lawsuit involving obstruction of justice, adulterous sex and the Mafia.

This is insane. Does anyone know the name of the reporter who asked Rudy his opinion about the "B Word"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
44. Hillary is the B word? B word = Bush Lite
Yes, she is Bush Lite, the "B" word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC