Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM + TPM Cafe: Rough Night for Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:12 AM
Original message
TPM + TPM Cafe: Rough Night for Hillary
Hillary in the Debate

10.31.07 -- 10:53AM
By Josh Marshall
The post-debate spin seems to be that Hillary had a pretty rough night. Early in the debate I noted her unflappability and her refusal to ever flub a debate question. But I admit it got a lot rougher toward the end, perhaps especially on the immigration question. Frontrunners can and usually do get away without giving many specifics. That's just how campaigns work. The other contenders can and should try to hammer on that and force her to show her hand on key issues. But let's not kid ourselves about the fact that this is hardly unique or new to Hillary.

That said, she does seem to be taking it to an almost absurd length. To me, the illegal immigrant driver's license exchange was less interesting because of her evasion than because of the dual personality she's brought to the debate. Most frontrunners dodge tough questions or give politically safe answers. But Hillary also wanted to have a serious-minded conversation about the question, noting the public safety rationales behind the very unpopular policy of giving driver's licenses to illegals. She actually grappled with the issue and pointed to the apparent necessity of the policy. But as soon as it came to 'endorsing', which here meant embracing the logical extension of everything she just said, she pulled back.

It's almost as if her background as a serious policy person is coming back to bite her. She can't restrain herself from injecting actual policy discussions into her public presentation as an annoying teflon frontrunner.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/057518.php

TPMCafers Respond to Dem Debate

10.31.07 -- 10:54AM
By David Kurtz
M.J. Rosenberg:

Most important for me was that the Iran issue was at last confronted. I think that her vote for Kyl-Lieberman was Hillary's big mistake of the campaign season.


Greg Anrig:

To continue to shy away from attacking conservative ideology, which is the root cause of almost all of the Bush administration’s failures, amounts to political malpractice.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/057517.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yee-aah..
"Most important for me was that the Iran issue was at last confronted. I think that her vote for Kyl-Lieberman was Hillary's big mistake of the campaign season.


Greg Anrig:

To continue to shy away from attacking conservative ideology, which is the root cause of almost all of the Bush administration’s failures, amounts to political malpractice."


Grrr..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. They Kyl Lieberman vote wasn't just a campaign error, it was an enabling vote for
the neocons to use if they go ahead with their crazy strategy of attacking Iran. Just as her vote in the IWR was fateful so is her Kyl-Lieberman vote. It's very telling, regardless of what later spin she attempts to put on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I had been just about to forgive and forget about the IWR whenshe voted for the Iran Bill
And now as I realize that she is surrounded by ghouls, I can't face voting for her. Any time for any reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. She also stated that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons when...
there has been no evidence of that, sounds like another Iraq war lead up. Notice how she said a few times that she is not for A RUSH TO WAR, not that she is not for a war but a rush to war with Iran. If we make her the nominee, we are guaranteed more war and death from either her or the republican that beats her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC