Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

True or False- "Edwards is not progressive. Hell he can not even pull his own state."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:16 PM
Original message
Poll question: True or False- "Edwards is not progressive. Hell he can not even pull his own state."
Heard it in a McClurkin thread- an Obama supporter claimed this to deflect questions about how "progressive" Obama actually is. Personally, even though I'm a Hillary supporter, I agree that Edwards is probably one of, if not *THE* most progressive candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. He'll get healthcare and SS straightened out and he's a damn good lawyer to boot
Plus he seems to be in this thing just to make his wife proud. In fact, I see him as a new William Jennings Bryan who can pull in the rural voters out there who wouldn't touch a ballot with HRC's name on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I voted false but remembered Univeral Health Care is not a progressive.....
idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. When did North Carolina become a progressive state?
The statement is a contradiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I was thinking the same thing
I think Edwards could very well be considered "progressive", depending upon how narrow one's definition of "progressive" is. But ability to carry NC has little to do with how progressive Edwards is. NC may be moving slowly towards "swing" state status, but a state that only recently stopped electing Senator Jesse Helms should not be considered representative of "progressivism"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Yes. The statement is either a contradiction or includes two
completely unrelated proposals. It's a very strange poll, but then what's new about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Edwards is the most progressive candidate this year, I believe.
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 10:21 PM by Basileus Basileon
I have some doubts as to how much of his platform he actually believes, given his opinions when he was a member of the Senate. However, I'm more than willing to take a late convert if he'll do the right thing, and that's why I'm supporting him at the moment.

I don't know what his popularity back home has to do with suggesting he's not progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. The question implies an either or
Either Edwards is a progressive and he can carry NC, or he's not and he cannot.

Although I do think it is possible for a progressive to win in NC, in recent history people such as Elizabeth Dole have done better. If Edwards does not do well in NC, it's because he's a progressive, which does not go down in some parts of the state, such as Winston-Salem, the rural bits, and anywhere freaky-ass people gather to handle snakes and babble like toddlers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's our most progressive with a chance to win the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can you say "push poll"?
Ah knew you could.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Actually, the point of this poll was to point out the ridiculous desperation of some B.O. supporters
Although I can certainly see how this can be construed as an "anti-edwards" poll. For the record, I've made it pretty clear many times that Edwards is my second favourite candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. The first glimmer of his progressive values surface in 1998 when he publically advocated for
the poor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hint: Obama is done for, time for Edwards?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Um.
How's the view?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well my view is clear because I'm no one's GIRL. Well ...
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 10:32 PM by ShortnFiery
I was my "daddy's girl" but he's deceased. I'm my own person ... hyperbole and drama mean nothing to me ... never did - never will. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. NC has progressive areas, but for the most part...
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 10:30 PM by TWriterD
they are surrounded by a whole helluva lotta red. Here's a sampling of what I see on a daily basis, and I live in one of the blue areas:

--"If You Can't Feed 'Em, Don't Breed 'Em"
--The Confederate flag in the shape of a woman on all fours with the caption "Southern Style"
--"Fred Thompson '08"
--"Who Would Osama Vote For '08"
--"Shoot a Yankee for Jesus"

And I'm still not used to this: Jesus fish and scripture on some fast food cups.

It means nothing that he "can not even pull his own state."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's a nonsequitor. You should have put "and" between the two things.
And he is a progressive. And he may be able to win his own state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jillian Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. I chose other.
He was a moderate when he was a Senator.
He was a moderate when he ran for President 4 years ago.

Now he talks like a populist but doesn't act like a populist.

I'm not really sure who he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. The key is, he was able to get elected in a state that is overwheleming GOP.
He started speaking in public, about the plight of the poor, in 1998. And his life's work, has not been for the big guy, but for the little guy.

When he was in private practic, he and his law partner, received a national award for public service. Not service to the rich, not service to the corportaions, not service to the big lobby's, but PUBLIC SERVICE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. Other: progressive is not a static place, but a continuum.
Edwards is CURRENTLY (not historically) more progressive than Clinton and Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
21. No Presidential candidate who runs as a progressive will carry NC
Edwards knows how to win NC. He has done it before. He ran as a moderate in 1998 and was elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC