Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judicial Nomination Prompts Another Bipartisan Senate ‘Gang’ Meeting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 09:22 AM
Original message
Judicial Nomination Prompts Another Bipartisan Senate ‘Gang’ Meeting
Judicial Nomination Prompts Another Bipartisan Senate ‘Gang’ Meeting
By CQ Staff | 9:26 AM; Oct. 23, 2007

By Keith Perine, CQ Staff

Liberal and conservative activists will closely watch a procedural Senate vote this week that could herald a renewed battle over judicial nominees.

Senate leaders plan a vote, probably Wednesday, to limit debate on the nomination of Leslie Southwick to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. Neither supporters nor opponents predict the outcome. At least 60 senators would have to support invoking cloture to proceed to a vote on the nomination itself.

Southwick’s fate could be determined before the cloture vote, however. Moderate Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska has scheduled a bipartisan meeting of senators in his office Tuesday morning to discuss the nomination.

Nelson was the Democratic leader of the Gang of 14 senators who prevented a parliamentary meltdown in May 2005 over Democratic filibusters of appellate nominations. Nelson said he hopes the new group, which includes members of the old one, also will meet in the future to discuss other Senate logjams.

An array of liberal advocacy groups, as well as the Congressional Black Caucus, opposes Southwick. Mississippi Republican Thad Cochran, Southwick’s chief Senate proponent, says his side is trying to make sure all of Southwick’s supporters will be present for the vote.

If Democrats filibuster Southwick’s nomination, they will risk reprisal from Republicans who are already irritated that the Senate is not moving quickly on President Bush’s appellate court nominees. Republicans say the Senate should confirm about 17 such nominations during the 110th Congress to approximate the track record of recent lame-duck, two-term presidents with Senate majorities of the opposite party.

more...

http://www.cqpolitics.com/2007/10/judicial_nomination_prompts_an.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. SPAY OR NEUTER YOUR BLUE DOGS! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Go to hell, Ben Nelson. Sincerely, a constituent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC