Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting read: How Democrat fund-raiser scored Dean knockout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 10:24 AM
Original message
Interesting read: How Democrat fund-raiser scored Dean knockout
How Democrat fund-raiser scored Dean knockout

February 19, 2004

BY LYNN SWEET WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF

There is much to study in the rise and fall of Howard Dean's presidential campaign. A chapter in that story is the attack against the former Vermont governor bankrolled by a small group of anti-Dean Democrats, led by Democratic fund-raiser David Jones.
-snip-

Why: Dean's campaign accused the Jones fund of being a front for former candidate Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-Mo.), who at one time was Dean's main Iowa rival, and the current front-runner Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.). Jones is most often identified as a former fund-raiser for Gephardt, but he has a string of Democratic clients, including former Vice President Al Gore and Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.). At least five of the individual donors and all the unions have ties to Gephardt; other donors have connections to Kerry and retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark, who dropped out of the race Feb. 11.

Next: Friday is when the next reports come out, and Jones' will show he has replenished his kitty and is sitting on $270,000.
-end-

http://www.suntimes.com/output/sweet/cst-edt-sweet19.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is it me ..
Edited on Thu Feb-19-04 10:49 AM by meegbear
or are people trying to find reasons and excuses at every turn as to why Dean didn't do well?

Maybe other people just wanted another candidate? Maybe people don't see Dean the same way you do. Or maybe (gasp) they don't care for Dean the same way you don't care for the other candidates.

I know everybody at the meetup said they voted for Dean, but they were not the only people voting that day. I know that's a tin-foil hat, grassy knoll thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, it's not only you...
It's painfully obvious that scapegoats are being found.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Whoa...this kind of B*#!%!t is WAY out of bounds and needs to be brought..
...into the light of day. We need to know the origins of this sludge campaign because it was NOT RIGHT and BY GOD we're Democrats and I would like to think we stand for something higher than Nixonian dirty tricks. Like Bush's "whisper campaign" against McCain in South Carolina in 2000, this was an underhanded, secret maneuver which succeeded; but which ultimately reflects poorly on the candidates who engineered it.

I'm a grown up...I know that revealing the source of Jones' funding (Torricelli for one)will not bring Howard Dean back into the race. Life (and campaigns) ain't fair. But Damn it, transparency in campaign funding is an absolute "no brainer" for Democrats at least. It also just happens to be the LAW.

When Kerry supporters go on line to support this type of garbage...and make no mistake-- mocking Dean supporters for "sour grapes" is tantamount to supporting the gutter campaign itself... you do a disservice to party unity, and a service to gutter campaign tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Since this isn't LBN...
...can you edit the headline to say DemocratIC? "Democrat" as an adjective is like fingernails on a blackboard to many of us. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Even though its not late breaking news. . .
. . .I don't think its necessary to edit the title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC