|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ringmastery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:09 PM Original message |
They are really talking up Edwards on MSNBC, could we see an upset tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. Russert on NBC said earlier that Edwards couldn't win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Edwards as nominee would be Russert's nightmare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. Nope. It's JK all the way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tweed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. Certainly not an upset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuban_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
4. I don't see it in the cards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Well, it is *possible*. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KurtNilsen (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
5. very interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:15 PM Original message |
There will be at least one results thread, right here on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. It was interestin to see a live interview on cnn with kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. They probably just want to see the race become competitive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:17 PM Original message |
CNN Just showed a stat saying a huge number of new Edwards supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
12. That's good news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
13. Wow. Terry McAuliffe, are you listening??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Terry Mac |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 08:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
32. Fuck Terry McAuliffe. His actions border on undemocratic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
14. If they're new voters, they probably never got called by any of the ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 08:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
37. That Is Probably True, My Friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boobooday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
9. The way I feel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. I will gladly trade primary dates with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
11. Actually, Tweety cannot read his own graphics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
16. And talking down Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
18. Yup, the media is still trying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:33 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Can Repukes vote in WI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I don't think Repukes can vote in any Dem primaries. Inds, yes, in some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:39 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Actually, it depends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. I'm pretty sure that the Dems don't seat delegates from states which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Yes. They can vote in the WI primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Do you have a cite confirming that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:48 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. I just watch the news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 08:16 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Without a verifiable source, yes, they mean nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:53 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. See here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 08:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. try this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:35 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. I find this to be offensive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KurtNilsen (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. I think you are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuban_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. That's incredibly insulting! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 07:57 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I think the idea is, that repukes would rather run against Edwards, than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 08:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. Sorry, but Edwards is the one the GOP feared first, and still fears now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 09:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. If they truly feared Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 09:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. If they truly feared Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
34. I heard that exit polls went pro-labor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 08:40 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Edwards is running anti-NAFTA in Wisconsin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 08:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Being anti-free trade is death to Edwards in NY and CA which need trade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zech Marquis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-17-04 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
41. wow!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC