Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"In Turmoil of ’68, Clinton Found a New Voice"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:24 PM
Original message
"In Turmoil of ’68, Clinton Found a New Voice"
Great article on Hillary's transformation in college from Goldwater Girl to committed Democrat...





WASHINGTON, Sept. 4 — In September 1968, Hillary Diane Rodham, role model and student government president, was addressing Wellesley College freshmen girls — back when they were still called “girls” — about methods of protest. It was a hot topic in that overheated year of what she termed “confrontation politics from Chicago to Czechoslovakia.”

“Dynamism is a function of change,” Ms. Rodham said in her speech. “On some campuses, change is effected through nonviolent or even violent means. Although we too have had our demonstrations, change here is usually a product of discussion in the decision-making process.”

Her handwritten remarks — on file in the Wellesley archives — abound with abbreviations, crossed-out sentences and scrawled reinsertions, as if composed in a hurry. Yet Ms. Rodham’s words are neatly contained between tight margins. She took care to stay within the lines, even when they were moving so far and fast in 1968. While student leaders at some campuses went to the barricades, Ms. Rodham was attending teach-ins, leading panel discussions and joining steering committees. She preferred her “confrontation politics” cooler.

“She was not an antiwar radical trying to create a mass movement,” said Ellen DuBois, who, with Ms. Rodham, was an organizer of a student strike that April. “She was very much committed to working within the political system. From a student activist perspective, there was a significant difference.”

As the nation boiled over Vietnam, civil rights and the slayings of two charismatic leaders, Ms. Rodham was completing a sweeping intellectual, political and stylistic shift. She came to Wellesley as an 18-year-old Republican, a copy of Barry Goldwater’s right-wing treatise, “The Conscience of a Conservative,” on the shelf of her freshman dorm room. She would leave as an antiwar Democrat whose public rebuke of a Republican senator in a graduation speech won her notice in Life magazine as a voice for her generation.

...

Unlike many of her peers, she never experimented with illegal drugs, Mrs. Clinton said. She embraced collegiate social rituals, attending mixers, showing up to Harvard football games (often with a book, a friend recalls) and planning a strawberries-and-cream bridal shower atop the Wellesley Bell Tower for a roommate, Johanna Branson.

Still, she was something of a sponge for all the angst and argument engulfing her generation. Ms. Shapiro recalled going to do errands one afternoon when Ms. Rodham handed her an unopened bottle of perfume she had bought and asked her to return it to the store.

“I asked why,” Ms. Shapiro recalled. “Her answer was that it was an extravagance she felt guilty about indulging in when there was so much poverty around us. We were increasingly sensitive to issues of what we now call white privilege. ”

When Dr. King was killed on the balcony of a Memphis motel on April 4, 1968, Ms. Rodham was devastated. “I can’t take it anymore,” she screamed after learning the news, her friends recalled. Crying, Ms. Rodham stormed into her dormitory room and hurled her book bag against the wall. Later, she made a telephone call to a close friend, Karen Williamson, the head of the black student organization on campus, to offer sympathy.

Ms. Rodham, who met Dr. King after a speech in Chicago in 1962, had admired his methodical approach to social change, favoring it over what she considered the excessively combative methods of groups like the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, or S.N.C.C., pronounced snick.

...

Keeping a Toe in the G.O.P.

For all her leftward movement, Ms. Rodham still kept a toe in the Republican Party, working as an intern in Washington that summer. Mr. Schechter, who supervised the Wellesley internship program, sent her to work for the House Republican Conference, then headed by Mr. Laird, the Wisconsin congressman who would later become President Richard Nixon’s defense secretary. “My adviser said, ‘I’m still going to assign you to the Republicans because I want you to understand completely what your own transformation represents,” Mrs. Clinton recalled of Mr. Schechter.

“I remember her being very bright, very aggressive and not very Republican,” said Ed Feulner, who managed the summer interns in the office and now heads the Heritage Foundation, a conservative research group.

Ever diligent, Ms. Rodham did “a fine job,” said Mr. Laird, citing a “very thorough and well-researched” speech she wrote on the financing of the Vietnam War. At the end of the internship, Ms. Rodham proudly posed for a photo with House Republican leaders, including Representative Gerald R. Ford of Michigan. The photo hung in her father’s bedroom when he died in 1993.

Along with other interns, Ms. Rodham was invited by Representative Charles Goodell, a moderate New York Republican, to help Gov. Nelson Rockefeller’s last-ditch campaign to defeat Mr. Nixon for the Republican nomination. At the party’s convention in Miami, she met Frank Sinatra, shared an elevator with John Wayne and decided to leave the Republican Party for good. “She was particularly furious at how she felt Rockefeller had been trashed by the Nixon people,” Mr. Schechter said.

“I’m done with this, absolutely,” Mrs. Clinton recalled thinking upon hearing Mr. Nixon’s acceptance speech. She characterized the Republicanism of her youth as one of fiscal conservatism and social moderation, and at odds with what she viewed as the intolerance of Miami.

“All of a sudden you get all these veiled messages, frankly, that were racist,” Mrs. Clinton said of the convention. “I may not have been able to explain it, but I could feel it.”


Alot more

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/05/us/politics/05clinton.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not to be mean, seriously, but, I am really sick of the boomer and the 60s
I am tail end and am so sick of all this harking back to the 60s, the boomer self involvement, refighting the same old things for 40 years and feeling like it's always ground hog day.
The 60s were 40 years ago. It time to put it to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sick of the boomer?.....Hey, I'm a boomer!..
And....the 60's are still happening where I am. We're not sick of 'em yet :hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Don't worry, he's only parroting Obama's remarks
If enough people repeat "I don't give a fuck about old people", Obama's comments won't seem that bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Bush 43 is a boomer.
He spoiled it for the rest of your generation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yeah.....But he couldn't get laid during the summer of love..
..and he was too scared to eat the acid (and see the light).

What a dip-shit!:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. The same & worse, can be said about the "Me, Me, Me" Generation(s).
Spoiled children stamping their feet & screaming loudly to get their way. If "after Boomer" generations were not so self involved, they would have seen long before now, the Boomers, the adults are just as sick & fed up.......


Most of us have worked all of our lives or close to it (already), paid taxes, rebuilt America more than once after wars, protested ....real protests in the streets against bad government/war(unlike keyboard protests), worked together to better this country for our children and their children.
Many of the actual "War Babies" i.e. My husband, born 1944, served in the Navy 61'- 63'. (still)working (44 years) paying taxes and trying to keep this country afloat in spite of bad government and those who grew up spoiled, watching TV, playing Video games, cars handed to them with cell phones attached, never worked a day in their life until they had to work and have no work ethic when they do work......

The Boomers tend to have great respect for our parents and grandparents for what they did and sacrificed before us to make America a better place. They deserve it.


I am puzzled that anyone can dismiss so easily those who marched & fought for Civil Rights, those who fought for Womens Rights, those who fought for Social Equality and Childrens Rights, those who died in another stupid war beacuse they were ordered to do so and the list goes on......all of this & more was happening in the 60's, early 70's. Many of these causes were there long before in decades past, but the Children of the 60's took to the streets and at the very least, made life very uncomfortable for the establishment and they didn't go home when it got tough or they got tired.....and we still do it because the "Me Generations" can not be bothered with other people's problems.



Not to be mean, but what have the young adults of the last 3 decades done for Society......compared to what "we" did in the 50's, 60's, 70's? Seriously......




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. And now she is trying to resurrect her version of Republicanism through the Democratic Party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's just what I thought when I read
"Ms. Rodham still kept a toe in the Republican Party"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Sometimes someone posts something...
Edited on Thu Sep-06-07 09:05 AM by SaveElmer
That is so stark in its idiocy that any repast could not do it justice...so will just let yours hang out there for the world to see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks so much for the post!
“People become experiences,”

I couldn't agree more...A lot of people here seem to forget that we are forged by our experiences, and that our perspective can change over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mustang Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. The NYT is writing some great articles on Hillary
I have really enjoyed their articles about her life in college. It's clear she was a leader very early in her life. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. Tommorrow's installment:
"How Hillary then completed her transformation from a sixties moderate liberal to a twenty first century corporate whore."

Yes, yes, more puff pieces on Clinton, that's nice and all, but really doesn't get into the meat of the matter now does it. Hell, there were and are a lot of sixties leftist radicals who have wound up being neo-cons or worse. And frankly, other than around her own little campus, Hillary didn't have much, if any, influence on the leftist politics and the anti-war movement. What's really sad is that despite having gone through the sixties, she came out in support of another illegal, immoral war thirty five years later. Just goes to show you how much she has changed since then, apparently not for the better.

Sorry, but despite the puff piece, Hillary wasn't some great sixties radical student leader. She was a minor player at a small college, who has since gone on to sell out on virtually all of the ideals of her youth. Another boomer gone bad, so sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC