Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chicago Tribune: No deadline for Edwards to bash Murdoch (and Fox)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 04:26 PM
Original message
Chicago Tribune: No deadline for Edwards to bash Murdoch (and Fox)

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/columnists/chi-sun_phil_0805aug05,0,7554240.column

Phil Rosenthal | Media
August 5, 2007

Obviously, presidential candidate John Edwards doesn't trust Rupert Murdoch's Fox News. Fine. A lot of people are wary of Murdoch and his media properties.

But where does the former U.S. senator turn to keep up with his current events? The papers? The Internet? TV? Radio? Comedy Central? Does he just eavesdrop on other people to learn what's going on in the world?

Edwards on Thursday urged his fellow Democrats to try to stop the merger of Murdoch's News Corp. and Dow Jones & Co., arguing Fox News and other Murdoch outlets are unfair when it comes to them and their party.

On Thursday.

Edwards urged Democrats to try to thwart Murdoch's acquisition of The Wall Street Journal's parent two days after Murdoch finally wore down the resistance of the controlling Bancroft family and secured the support needed to at last take Dow Jones.

That is three months after the world—at least most of it—first learned of Murdoch's $5 billion offer.

It's all well and good to protest Murdoch's attempt to take over the Journal and all the other goodies in the Dow Jones portfolio. But if you really want to stop something, shouldn't you raise a ruckus before it's all but a done deal, not after your nemesis has succeeded in a months-long battle to overcome the biggest obstacle he faces?

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. um, the deal wasn't voted on until WEDNESDAY!!!
Edited on Sat Aug-04-07 05:14 PM by jsamuel
It was being opposed by that family and it was going to fail, but then on WEDNESDAY one of them switched their vote in favor of the deal so that it would go through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. THANK YOU! I'm In A FOUL Mood Today So I Will Just Leave It At That... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC