away with the coming election (one in which can be easily rigged)? Yeah right. These guys have nothing to lose and everything to win. They believe that the masses will not sacrifice their livestyles and rise up in protest. Clinton will be the nominee because they can steal it w Clinton and then the pollsters will come out and say "she was just too devisive".
I always assumed the Dems had a plan in '04 in case the election was stolen. We had dozens of lawyers beseige Central Ohio before the election, as well as election protection folks, so it looked like a plan, but alas after it occurred, all we could get were ~ 2,500 (and of course the corporate media listed it in the hundreds) out on the streets at the scene of the crime.
THAT SAID...Conyers and the House Judiciary Dem Staff KNOW * stole the election. I believe they are working their way toward correction, but in a way to avoid "revolution".
We must have a plan in place to verify the vote right away. If questionable results come back then legal action needs to be worked out ahead of time, and ready to go promptly into the courts.
OH...AND GET JAMES CARVILLE THE FUCK AWAY FROM OUR CANDIDATE:
Did Carville Tip Bush Off to Kerry Strategy (Woodward)
By M.J. Rosenberg | bio
On page 344, Woodward describes the doings at the White House in the early morning hours of Wednesday, the day after the '04 election.
Apparently, Kerry had decided not to concede. There were 250,000 outstanding ballots in Ohio.
So Kerry decides to fight. In fact, he considers going to Ohio to camp out with his voters until there is a recount. This is the last thing the White House needs, especially after Florida 2000.
-snip
"Carville told her he had some inside news. The Kerry campaign was going to challenge the provisional ballots in Ohio -- perhaps up to 250,000 of them. 'I don't agree with it, Carville said. I'm just telling you that's what they're talking about.'
-snip
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/oct/07/did_carville_tip_bush_off_to_kerry_strategy_woodward