Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC wants a rightwinger to replace Imus. FIGURES!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:09 PM
Original message
MSNBC wants a rightwinger to replace Imus. FIGURES!!!!
http://multichannel.com/article/CA6446688.html
MSNBC Eyes Scarborough as Possible Imus Replacement - 5/25/2007 9:47:00 AM - Multichannel News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Imus was a rightwinger
Why would you be surprised he'd be replaced with another rightwinger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Imus was a moderate. He was fired because he wasn't a right-winger. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But Imus would criticize his own party when they were wrong he's called Cheney a war criminal
Edited on Sat May-26-07 12:15 PM by bigdarryl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. So has Scarborough
So there you go. What he says against Democrats doesn't make up for rare moments of lucidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. three seconds of sanity, 3 hours of rightist crap. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. I thought David Gregory was a wrap for Imus's spot?
what happened with him...he declined the invitation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. No shit thats the rumor Micheal Smerconish was putting out there
I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. It's the GOP who want MSNBC to replace Imus with a RWinger..
makes more sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Actually, Imus was a dolt
worse than an idiot. In any event, he was fired because he's a racist sexist pig and had incident after incident of being unable to control himself.

He was not a moderate, he was the typical rural white "independent" male who loves himself and loathes everybody not like him, particularly Democrats. If you think it did us any good having him repeat every stupid ass Dem bashing talking point that came along, think again.

It's STILL good he's gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Imus actually apologised and tried to change things. Would Rush? Would O'Reily? Would any other
right-winger in big media do that? No. And they wouldn't have to because they haven't gone after the Republican leadership for their failures like Imus did.

Imus was fired for being a moderate instead of a right-winger. The excuse that the corporatists used was that he made a racist "joke".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. By suing them?
Because he was just doing what he was hired to do??? By trying to blame Al Sharpton? By whining about cultural music that has absolutely nothing to do with him?

I'm white. I know how many racists there are in the country. I know what it means to hire someone to "tell the nigger jokes". A lot of people really showed their true colors around here during the Imus fiasco.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. He seemed to me to be a right wing showman who happened to turn against Bush
after initially voting for him and supporting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. He was using his show to promote Guiliani! That's not right-wing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Oh nonsense. He was on the right.
Let me guess, you think because he nominally backed Kerry while kicking the crap out of his campaign, that he was a moderate? Or perhaps because he paid lip service to calling the war a mess, while giving Lieberman unrestricted air time to promote the neocon agenda? No moderate. Constant fawning over one rightwing politician after another, constant savaging of everyone even remotely left of the rightist politics the bullshit media system declares to be the 'center'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Okay. Okay. You guys are right that he is a right-winger. I still say he was fired for his lack of
Edited on Sat May-26-07 02:32 PM by w4rma
loyalty to the Republican leadership rather than racism, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Gunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. That part is true, just listen to what Rush gets away with
It's pretty scarry that they consider Imus not right enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Gunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. Bingo
Edited on Sat May-26-07 08:57 PM by The Gunslinger
If MSNBC wants something more right then Imus, they might have to dig up Joseph Goebbels or something. He spoke against the war sometimes, but he was totally soft when Cheney was on his show, and his hate for Gore and the Clintons woud alone remove him from being a moderate on my list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Um, rightwingers wouldn't endorse John Kerry.
As Homer Simpson would say "D'OH!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Then turn around and trash him for 3 years?
I'd rather he had went ahead and endorsed Bush and not repeated every stupid-ass lie that the right wing spewed about Kerry. Would have done us a hell of a lot more good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. Imus is a mercenary...If you had the bucks to donate to his charity..
making him look good, he'd throw you a bone! Without his show, he's irrelevant!

Good riddance to bloviating trailer trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. The media must be fair and balanced
the Faux way. That means conservative and extreme conservative, didn't you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. lol - I'll have to remember that - Fair & balanced = conservative and extremely conservative!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just for arguments sake - if Scarborough were progressive - he is BORING - imho! I tolerate him for
an hour at night when it is a more structured program. Chatting away for hours at a time - he simply cannot do it.

My understanding is MS NBC ratings have gone in the toilet - they will not be able to pull them out by putting Joe in that time-slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. You wouldn't want msnbc to become unfair and imbalanced..........
would you?! It takes 10 rethugs to equal 1 KO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. With the exception of Keith Olbermann, msnbc is
increasingly becoming more irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Scarborough's not really much of a right-winger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. I never watched Imus.
I dislike joe scarborough more. That twithead honcho at msnbc prog is and idiot. Dan whats his name. Oh i remember abrams he is useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. NO "MORNING JOE." Please, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. Imus spent all his time promoting Guiliani, so it's going to be a wash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. He supported McCain but voted for Kerry in '04. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. He catapulted every rightwing smear against Kerry
while pretending to support him. I have no idea how he actually voted, nor do you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. The big one I remember was Imus bitching about Kerry's train not stopping at the ranch
and then describing how all the sick kids watched it shoot by.

Lord, he did everything he could to hurt Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. At least Scarborough is not a racist, at least I don't think...
nothing I could tell as of yet would lead me to indicate he's a racist, so he's one better already than Imus, the corpse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. That's ok he thinks women should be compelled to give birth
even if they would not particularly like to do that. That makes him a bit of an asshat sexist shithead, in my opinion.

We are debating here about which rightwing shithead is worse: Imus or Scarborough. Silly, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
27. So we replace someone who supported Kerry in 2004, with a damn rightwinger?
Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. I've seen each of their replacements in the AM and JS was the best.
When he was on he was really good. I can't believe that he wants to leave Pensacola to get up at 4:00AM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. We need to have our own news channel built.
Our wealthy liberals are MIA on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
31. would this mean an opening in scarborough's night time slot?
maybe for rachel maddow, who's supposedly has been courted by msbc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
32. Scarborough has been the best of the trial guests so far
I'm up at that hour and have watched portions of everyone they have tried. Scarborough has enough offbeat tendencies to succeed in a format and time slot like that. Plus he can combine enough competence in the serious political interviews. His energy level and decibel level were down but that's been true of everyone, not accustomed to that hour.

Plus if you transfer Scarborough that lends potential to replace him with a progressive at 9 PM, which could benefit MSNBC if they could keep Olbermann's audience for an extra hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.0
==================



This week is our second quarter 2007 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend on donations
from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
37. they need someone to compete with all the other right wingers
the suits who run these places are as clueless as can be. just look at your own network numb skull! who has the highest ratings? what's the only show on your network that is competitive with the other networks? Olberman's show! So, then....ummmm you can either choose any number of excellent entertaining progressive hosts or you can stick a needle in your eye and choose some week old same as it ever was right winger. Take your pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
38. They liked scarborough. I saw him in the AM and he really wasn't bad
heresy. But, truthfully he is not one of those evil wingers. He is kinda fun to watch in the morning and not very partisan. I know you guys will kick my ass for that but, he really was not bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
43. It's a GREAT idea - there aren't anywhere near enough white men hosting cable sho
Giving another white man that slot will help balance out all of those black people who have their own shows.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC