Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Dennis Kucinich have a chance?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 11:53 PM
Original message
Poll question: Does Dennis Kucinich have a chance?
I am a strong, no avid, no.... well I support Dennis Kucinich for President. But what do you think, is he too liberal, too hopeful for the future of the country for people to take the chance on him. I mean B*sh got RE-appointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. A much better chance than I do. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larry in KC Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. You're being too hard on yourself, Heaven and Earth!
Your chances are probably about equal. What's your platform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wetcanvas Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
52. No
...but I love his forthright defense of socialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is up to us to
give it our damnest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Your right, I just hope enough of us have our heads OUT of our asses to make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. no chance, even though he's my choice
DLC candidates Clinton, Obama, and Edwards are getting all the media time. God knows, Obama and Edwards are still worlds better than any Republican, but I still don't like the media taking its orders from the DLC dweebs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Do pigs wear evening gowns and sing duets with Gwen Stefani?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Sounds like a hell of fundraiser to me
I'd pay to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
54. See last night's Oscar show...
Sorry I just couldn't resist. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. If He Comes Out Swinging in the Debates - He Has a Chance
Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama will be beating the snot out of one-another for the foreseeable future, while Edwards keeps trying to throw punches from the mezanine section of the twelfth tier of the stands in the master bedroom of his new "home".

But we still have more than a year to go before the election. They are all gonna' be lookin' awful after a year or so of scrappin'. I think that everyone will be sick of their BS by that point as well, and so Kucinich and the rest will have a chance - IF they kick butt in the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Do the debates matter that much?
If you are a low-information voter, tuning into the debates as your only exposure to the candidates, all the sides are going to sound good, and how will you know who is right and who is full of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. You May Be Right
I think that they're useful for getting a buzz going - if somebody really comes out looking good or bad. Most candidates stick to a tiny range of talking points these days, so there's not much drama. But if, say, Kucinich were to really go after Clinton and Edwards for being shameless tools of the Predator Class - and push for a Middle Class agenda - in a way that convincingly made the point - and keep hammering on it - I think he could get a buzz going.

It's really the only opportunity for candidates to be fairly compared, without benefit of their corporate warchests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. yes, Kucinich has a chance..
and I voted for him in 2004. That doesn't mean I think he is the best candidate running or that he will win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Everybody knows he hasn't a snowballs chance in hell
The positive thinking optimist will say otherwise, but every single one of us knows in our gut he has absolutely no chance unless all the other candidates were to die suddenly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Even if all the other candidate rose back from the dead, and were brain eating zombies.
Edited on Sat Feb-24-07 12:40 AM by Evoman
They would still beat Denny.

on edit: I would like to also say that I don't hate Kucinich. He seems like a good guy. But the guy can't win, man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. I wouldn't say he is too liberal. He was anti-choice up until a few years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrictlyRockers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. Nobody thought Carter had a chance in early 1975, either.
SR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark and Sharpton beat him in 04
I don't know what would make him do better in 08. At least he beat Lieberman in 04 though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. Does peace have a chance? Single-payer health care?
It's not so important whether or not somethng seems to have a chance. It's better to support the people and organizations that reflect your real and sincere inner beliefs. The rest is out of your control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. Trust me, you don't want Dennis.
Take it from people who have seen him in action for a long time and know. With him you get the worst of both worlds in one: all the spaciness of a New Age nutcase with all the bullheaded stubbornness and go-it-alone-even-if-no-one-else-agrees-with-me determination of a George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Your post indicates you DON'T know Dennis
I worked on his '04 campaign and support him this time around...you use of the term "New Age Nutcase" and insinuation that he is bullheaded are way off base. Dennis is so much better than the current occupant of the WH, and he is more right on the issues tan most of the Democratic field. The media will ignore him, the talking head bloggers will ridicule him and the people who support him will continue to do so.

Another poster mentioned that Hillary and Obama will tear eachother up over the next year or so. They are the leading candidates right now, in February 07. The election is 21 month away....alot can, and will, happen between now and then.

Trust me when I say that Dennis' message will gain ground as time goes on. Will he win the nomination? There are no guarantees but it is not out of the realm of possibility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
19. I could live with his anti-choice, anti-flag burning roots
but he has proven to be a better legislator than an executive. I feel there is a pretty big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. How has he proven to be
a better legislator? What's his record of success? How many bills or amendments has he gotten passed?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. according
to the "Power Rankings" at congress.org, Kucinich ranks 391 in "power" out of 435 congresspeople.

His "score" is 7.19.


http://www.congress.org/congressorg/power_rankings/party.tt?ch_party=HD&submit=GO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yes, but he was a horrible mayor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Were you in Cleveland at the time?
Or just parroting what you have heard from the MSM and closet righties?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Kos...closet rightie...or MSM member?
Edited on Sat Feb-24-07 03:05 PM by SaveElmer
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/2/23/113236/176


The 1999 book The American Mayor by Melvin G. Holli, ranked Kucinich the 7th worst mayor in the nation:

Only thirty-one years old when elected, Cleveland's "boy mayor" had failings that were not the sins of venality or graft for personal gain, but rather matters of style, temperament, and bad judgment in office. Kucinich earned seventh place the hard way: by his abrasive, intemperate, and chaotic administration. He barely survived a recall vote just ten months in office, then disappeared for five weeks, reportedly recuperating from an ulcer. When he got back into the political fray, his demagogic rhetoric and slash-and-burn political style got him into serious trouble when he stubbornly refused to compromise and led Cleveland into financial default in late 1978 - the first major city to default since the Great Depression. That led also to Kucinich's defeat and exit from executive office. Out of office, he dabbled in a Hollywoodesque spirit world and once believed that he had met Shirley MacLaine in a previous life, seemingly confirming his critics' charges that he was a "nutcake." After that, he experienced downward mobility, losing races for several other offices and finally ending up with a council seat; but more recently, he climbed back up to a seat in Congress. Bad judgment, demagoguery, and default also spelled political failure in the eyes of twenty-five of our experts, who ranked Dennis, whom the press called "Dennis the Menace", as seventh-worst.

This survey spanned mayors in the United States between 1820 and 1993. Notching the "7th Worst" slot was a serious accomplishment.


There is alot more!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. The post by Kos has been sliced and diced.....
Edited on Sat Feb-24-07 04:14 PM by AnOhioan
in two other threads here, I will not go into the time to refute it point by point. I will say that Kos seems to think very highly of himself. A legend in his own mind maybe? Talk with someone without an agenda or better yet, visit DK's website and decide from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Yes.
And you will find thousands of other residents that think he was a weak mayor too. You can try to convince yourself that they are all "parroting MSM" if you like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Reallly? I too was and still am, In Cleveland,
Edited on Sun Feb-25-07 12:12 AM by AnOhioan
And I can find many, many people who are grateful that Dennis was Mayor. And yes, the ones who buy into the "he was a bad mayor" meme are the same ones wh0 watch Faux News and think the chimp is the next coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. So the tens of thousands of people who voted for Kucinich's recall,
which he only escaped by a couple of hundred votes, were Fox News watching idiots? In 1978?
Ok. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Nice try
I was not referencing 1978. I am talking about 2007. And in 2007, one can find more who realize that true history of the events of 1978 than not.

Thanks for playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. I am not "trying." The people of Cleveland "tried" to recall him for being a crappy mayor
and came within a couple hundreds of votes of doing it.

Good luck with Kucinich in 2008. Hopefully he can break the 1% ceiling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Yeah you are "trying"
and may I say failing...

Your "insight" is appreciated...but our conversation serves no purpose in being continued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. No, I don't think he's too liberal. I think he's not a very good
candidate, with an uninspiring legislative career. And he's not a serious candidate. He's becoming the Harold Stassen of the 21st century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
25. No, and I wish he would drop out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Heh.
Do you wish all of those he brings to the table to exit with him?

Or do you wish we'd just shut up, hold our nose, and get in line, regardless of whether or not your choice offers us anything on our list of priorities?

Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dracos Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. I just don't see it happing.
but I think he would do a good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. If everybody who said, "I love Dennis, but he can't win" had had the guts
to vote for him in the primaries instead of voting for who they thought other people might like, who knows what might have happened?]

"He can't win" was the meme that the corporate media drummed into people from before the Iowa caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I think most
people who see Kucinich can arrive at the conclusion that he can't win without the media telling them that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Kucinich hasn't done anything to indicate he would be a good President...
Or that he could even handle the job...poor mayor, accomplished nothing of substance in Congress...flip flopped on abortion, stem cell research, and flag burning just as he was getting ready to run for President

He is a living laundry list of issues that folks on the left want pushed...by that standard 95% of DU is qualified...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Wow, right wingers really seem to hate DK.
What a surprise.

Must be because he orchestrated the House Democratic Caucus vote against the IWR. Or is it because he would like to end corporate control of our government?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #39
53. Are you calling me a right winger...
Do you know me? Of is it the typical cheap shot from the intolerant left wing that cannot abide dissent in any form?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. "the intolerant left wing that cannot abide dissent in any form?"
Pot.Kettle.Black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #39
55. How successful was he is stopping that resolution from passing?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. In this case, it's often said because it's true.
He's a bigger joke than Dukakis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. Last I checked the same media conglomerates that crucified
Al Gore as the "boring, nerdy know-it-all that you hated in high school" and lionized George Bush as the "cool, in-crowd guy that you wanted to be pals with" are still in place... if fact more concentrated and openly right wing than in 2000.

Dennis Kucinich as DEM nominee would be ridiculed unmercifully as a "dweeb" or something similar by about 90% of national media outlets in a national election. Sorry... but that's reality in this superficial media age. The very nature of our national election system makes these superficial perceptions about "personality" count far more than ability or competence or policy positions or even ideology.

If our national leaders were chosen under a Parliamentary system, then a Kucinich type might rise to a leadership position (ala Nancy Pelosi) and be selected as Prime Minister. But Dennis Kucinich has not even achieved that as yet in his Congressional career. So I would say his ambitions to be nominated and elected in our system are largely delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. Realistic chance, no
But he is a voice to bring other issues onto the front-runners' platforms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
37. Provisional yes, of course.
As you can tell, he is my first choice among those running. After examining his history and career I've concluded that he has a very good chance if he can accomplish __ things.

Forget the traditional path to the nomination, it is quite clear that those that control the Democratic Party would rather see another re:puke: administration in the White house than a liberal. There will never be any support, moral or monetary, from that element, so fuck them. He must leverage technology and the true American majority, the non-voters, and the minorities, to spread his populist message and anti-corporate agenda.

He has to stop playing nice. His "no-strings" tag line is a start, but only a start (and for god's sake stop with the twirling, it is just begging for ridicule), take it further, much further. He has been inside the beltway long enough to know how the sausage is made and who has put what into it, including himself. Use that information, pull out all the stops, name names and go on a slash and burn campaign to either force The Party to change or destroy it. He seems to be hesitant to make that final commitment, and he just has to decide if he is wants to be President or if he wants to maintain his career as a low-level, liberal prop, for The Party.

If he does these things, it then becomes is vital that he gets out in front of all his negatives. He will simply have to make up his mind to take the whole system on as they will come after him with everything they can find or make up about him. The only strategy that will work is to just get all the shit out there, suck up all the free press it will generate, and take their ammunition away. Then he better get a whole lot of the best security available because they kill him if they can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
38. no. but because of our shortcomings. not his own. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
42. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
43. There is a critical mass in politics
And much as I wish he had it, he doesn't. He is a good man, but the way the system is set up, he will never get the nomination. More's the pity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
47. Nope, he does not
Let's be realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
48. In reality, he doesn't.
I still enjoy his voice in the race though!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debs Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
49. He doesnt
I am a HUUUGE Kucinich supporter, but he doesnt. Is part of my liberal curse, any candidate I just love, doesnt have a chance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
50. No
thanks to the system in place today. No one who refuses to serve at the pleasure of the bourgeoisie is flush out of luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
56. snowball in hell
He is my favorite but he has no chance whatsoever.
Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
57. One for Kucinich I feel people totally underestimate him
in a debate it will be interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
58. If we win, he would be great in the Cabinet.
State? Health and Human Services?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
59. Not if he continues to hire amateurs to run his campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
60. If he looked like John Edwards, he would.
And if John Edwards looked like Kucinich, he'd be polling lower than Dodd. Especially with that house. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
61. No: But miracles do happen from time to time N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC