APPROVAL RATINGS FOR ALL 100 U.S. SENATORS AS OF 05/23/06

existentialist

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-23-06 09:43 PM
Original message

APPROVAL RATINGS FOR ALL 100 U.S. SENATORS AS OF 05/23/06

Edited on Tue May-23-06 09:58 PM by wicasa

http://www.surveyusa.com/50State2006/100USSenatorApproval060523Net.htm

APPROVAL RATINGS FOR ALL 100 U.S. SENATORS AS OF 05/23/06

SurveyUSA May�s Senatorial Approval ratings are in and the Senators with negative approval ratings are:

Net negative
89. Saxby Chamliss, Republican, GA -1%
89. Mel Martinez, Republican, FL -1%
89. Jim Talent, Republican, MO -1%
92. Wayne Allard, Republican. CO -2%
93. Jon Kyl, Republican, AZ -3%
94. John Cornyn, Republican, TX -4%
94. Richard Burr, Republican, NC -4%
96. Mark Dayton, Democrat, MN -5%
97. Frank Lautenburg, Democrat, NJ -6%
98. Jim Bunning, Republican, KY -8%
99. Conrad Burns, Republican, MT -16%
100. Rick Santorum, Republican, PA -21%

The Media sponsors for the polls on these particular Senators are:

WXIA-TV WTLV-TV
WKRG-TV
KSDK-TV KCTV-TV
KUSA-TV
KPNX-TV
WOAI-TV KEYE-TV
WTVD-TV WFMY-TV
KSTP-TV WDIO-TV KSAX-TV KAAL-TV
WABC-TV WCAU-TV
WHAS-TV WCPO-TV

WCAU-TV

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

liberalhistorian

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-23-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message

1. I understand and am happy to see most of them,

but what the hell has MN's Mark Dayton done to deserve this? Seems to me that that grave-dancing Bush-boot-licking Bushbot ghoul Norm Coleman is the MN senator who deserves and should have that rating.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

fujiyama

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-23-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message

2. Lookin' OK there

Edited on Tue May-23-06 09:57 PM by fujiyama

Of the two Dems with negative ratings, neither is up for reelection this year. But both states do have their other seat up for grabs. The Dems can't afford to lose either seat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

speedoo

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-23-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #2

3. Both Dems are not likely to seek another term, IMO.

In fact, hasn't Dayton said he was retiring?

As for Lautenberg, he could probably win another term, unless the rethugs come up with a good candidate. But he has to be in his late 70's by now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Stinky The Clown

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-23-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #3

6. Frank's 81 or 82

Something like that ..... over 80, for certain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

killerbush

(822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-23-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message

4. Wasn't Dayton the one who lambasted Feingold on censure??

Or impeachment? I remember reading something about that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

liberalhistorian

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-23-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #4

5. Well, if he did do that, then

I understand his low ratings much better!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.