|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 11:59 AM Original message |
I heard there is an 4.7 unemployment rate from.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyberpj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. But they never talk about the quality of the employment these days. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lindisfarne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 02:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Nor will they talk about the unemployed not included in the statistics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. The way the government has reported the unemployment rate since Reagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. That's because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 12:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. My point exactly the dems always... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 05:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. In this particular case, the panel was only Russert and 2 Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 05:55 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. The discussion was about immigration... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 09:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Yeah, I won't dispute that it happens sometimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
win_in_06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 02:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Was the same standard for measurement of unemployment used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 05:58 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. I suspect no because.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. They are all hiding from the inconvenient fact that they are not counting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LongTomH (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. Actually closer to something like 10% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. low paid jobs plus the estimate of birth/death count plus the not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
7. Almost all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
8. Unreliable statistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 08:23 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. If the underemployed were counted, the numbers would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
9. I'm fairly sure everyone knows that # is BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. The unemployment rate is around 10%. If you actually count. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
primative1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
12. Part of the problem or the part of the solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
area51 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
13. unemployment rate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
14. That's BS -- the true rate is nearly double that figure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NI4NI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
20. They've taken credit for what Clinton did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC