Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My response to the "Hotshots" on Hardball...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:02 PM
Original message
My response to the "Hotshots" on Hardball...
I just had to do this. I know I'm gonna get flamed...but hey! Sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.

How can you reconcile your HOTSHOT panel's assertion that the American people don't care if their phone records are being mined by the government when YOUR OWN MSNBC POLL states OTHERWISE? Who paid your panel to lie to the American people about their concerns re: wiretapping? For goodness sakes...take a look! It's at 85% AGAINST the government spying domestically. 65,000 votes registered. 85% see it as an intrusion. Again, how do you people reconcile the bs you spew on your cable news channel? Unbelievable.

Lame. Really lame. Once again...thanks for doing your damndest to MISINFORM the American public. Jeez, Chris...will you EVER learn? One has to wonder..........

The poll your people are discussing concerns OVERSEAS phone calls. You know that, right? Smoke, mirrors and lies! You are putting this country at risk by your inability to REPORT with ACCURACY and HONESTY! Shame on you. Really. How can you people sleep at night?

Take a look at your OWN poll. See for yourselves...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12738454 /

The WaPo only polled 502 people and the question spoke of overseas...YOU KNOW THAT, TOO. Accountability, Chris. The American people are waiting. The American people deserve better. Damn. Get a grip, would you?


Fucking liars. I'm sick to death of it. Just had to respond! I couldn't help myself. :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. the hotshots are a typically sorry lot
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I know...but really! They've totally disregarded their OWN poll,.
I know it's not worth my time, but it sure as hell felt good doing it. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:07 PM
Original message
oh I hear that
it's lots of fun whipping ass like that. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. Really. "Hardball" seems more like "FOXball" to me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. HUMILIATING, really...three GOP stooges!
And a ringmaster who is really only qualified to scoop up the poop after the pachyderm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. POTUS protectors...
Protectors Of The Unseemly Shit will still find that it rolls DOWNHILL!! Assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very good!
But they should be called Pot Shots. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Or CRAP SHOTS...
LOL!:hi:

Are you busy preparing you Fitzgiving feast? Havocmom gave me the idea...I love it. There will certainly be MUCH to be thankful for, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. keepin' the propaganda machine rolling along 24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for calling them on their lies and deception fooj, you rock!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Thanks, Uncle Joe.
Sometimes I just can't let things go...you know what I mean. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. My Responses
Edited on Fri May-12-06 05:09 PM by OrangeCountyDemocrat
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:

And I should point out, that I watched for about 3 minutes, before I couldn't take anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sorry but you are wrong not them.
Edited on Fri May-12-06 05:10 PM by dsc
The thing on their website isn't a poll. It is a self selected bunch of people. The Washington Post presumedly used statistically random ways of selecting the people who they asked. That makes their poll more accurate. The other point about wording is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. "presumedly" being the key word here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. polsters do that
that is their job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. 500 people polled is HARDLY worth reporting, IMO.
65,000 people cast a vote at MSNBC...I really don't care how "scientific" it is. It still beats the hell out of a HUGE DEAL being made out of 500 people being polled with a question that isn't even being reported accurately. I call BULLSHIT...pure and simple. No offense intended towards you, BTW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. You need to study math then
It isn't even a little contraversial that random samples can be small and still valid. 500 strikes me as on the small side and thus the MOE must be fairly large on the Post poll. But it still runs rings around the 65,000 self selected people. To see one example of why say Robertson sent a questionaire to 70000 of his followers charging them $10 to respond. Do you think his poll would be an accurate representation of the country's views on religion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I voted. that makes me "self-selected"?
How do we know that the WaPo followed the "rules of polling"? You said yourself that the MOE must be fairly large.

Besides, you and I BOTH know that American people DO NOT CONDONE domestic spying. That's a given. Furthermore...the poll in question (WaPo) isn't polling for DOMESTIC...they were polling for INTERNATIONAL. Big difference. Misrepresentation at its finest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. That is what self selected means
You care deeply and passionately about this issue. It isn't unreasonable that most people who are passionate are going to be on your side. Measuring public opinion is a science and real scientists are in charge of polls like the Post's. Without seeing the poll in question, my guess is the MOE is around 6 or so percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Check this out.
Edited on Fri May-12-06 05:38 PM by fooj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I did
and all of those points are indeed valid but none of them have a thing to do with sample size. Polls can be poorly worded or ill advised as this one evidently was but still be mathematically valid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Agreed.
Polls can be poorly worded or ill advised as this one evidently was but still be mathematically valid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. You go, girl!
:applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearthem Donating Member (573 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Wish more people would do as you have! That's what it will take!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Welcome to DU! Why don't you send them one off, too?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thank you fooj.
I can't believe people can't see Chris Mathews for what he is indeed is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmunchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. More like Hardballs hotspots!
They really are lame most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hotshots ...... How does the Fuschia Sausage get to be a hot shot?
Sheeza sleeza flinga

The RW media at its worst.

Hairballz and Hotshits

Fuck 'em
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. BWAHAHAHA! "Fuschia Sausage"!
Fuck 'em, indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. And just to be clear .....
... that's not a snark about her weight. It is about her complete fucking inability to DRESS APPROPRIATELY.

She has worse fashion sense than Lump-in-the-bed-Laura.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Laura "I wear the skins of my enemy" Bush?
Quick! GET THE FASHION POLICE! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. K & R - and here's another thread on how the WaPo/ABC poll is BOGUS:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1174702
thread title (5-12-06 GD): Bogus WaPo/ABC poll on Americans' "support" of NSA spying-FIGHT THIS SCAM!

It's so transparent, this lying and propaganda. We cannot let them get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I'm glad we are on the same team.
Accountability. Now.

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. Me too. And did you see that the company doing the poll has as its
primary clients "telecommunications service providers"? This gem was found by a poster in the Firedoglake article cited in the other thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1174702#1175731

Conflict of interest, much? The ABC/WaPo "poll" is transparently false and was fabricated as the focus of the massive misinformation campaign that we now see unfolding in the owned press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
32. can you hear me now?? woooo hoooooo!!!...i love to see these
fuckers caught lying!!


wooooooooooooooooooo hoooooooooooooooooooo...

K&R!!!

GO GIRL!

FLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. K&R...now that's a spanking...Nice one Ms. fooj!!!!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Aw shucks...
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
36. Let me see...
A washed up politician whose name is still synonymous with a scandal...a hoarse throated reporter who relies on sensational murder stories to keep her audience...a bush bot clone recently humiliated and forced into semi-retirement by a comedy show host...

Oh, THOSE HOTSHOTS!!

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Lying, filthy rat bastards.
I wish I could laugh...it just frosts me to no end!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. A little over the top, fooj...
Edited on Fri May-12-06 10:18 PM by tinfoilinfor2005
I would never have called them rats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Good one.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
40. Scarborough has turned on shrub....
he has been fun to watch lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC