Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Swift-Boating Works -- Santorum Now Within Striking Distance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 08:17 PM
Original message
Swift-Boating Works -- Santorum Now Within Striking Distance
Poll finds Casey's lead falling

By CATHERINE LUCEY

U.S. SEN. Rick Santorum has slashed Democratic challenger Bob Casey Jr.'s once- double-digit lead and is now just 6 percentage points back, according to the latest Daily News/CN8 Keystone Poll. "Everybody expected this race to tighten. Nobody expected it to tighten this quickly," said G. Terry Madonna, professor of public affairs at Franklin & Marshall College and director of the poll.

The survey of 578 registered voters conducted last week showed state treasurer Casey, who is expected to easily win the Democratic primary, as the choice of 47 percent to 41 percent for Santorum. The margin of error for the poll was 4.1 percent. In November, Casey led the Republican incumbent by 51 percent to 35 percent.

Negative television ads by pro-Santorum special-interest groups and attacks from his primary opponents have hurt Casey, Madonna said. Voters have grown more negative towards Casey, Madonna said, noting that his "unfavorable" ratings have increased to 13 percent, up from 8 percent in February.

"You know Sandals and Pennacchio are beating him up pretty badly," he said. "I think that's taking its toll on Casey in the Southeast."


************************

Other findings from the poll:

Gov. Rendell has pulled far ahead of Republican opponent Lynn Swann, and is now leading the former NFL star and broadcaster by 14 percentage points.

"I think that's largely because of the commercials he's been running around the state," said Madonna. "I think that's been the principal reason. The second reason is Rendell himself has been energetically running around the state." Rendell has been running TV ads across the state that have gone unanswered.


more at http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/14495983.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not too worried just yet about the numbers and here's why
Casey ISN'T the democratic nominee yet - in fact they haven't had the primaries. So why is god's name would Casey waste all this money campaigning against Santorum when he still have a primary to win? If anything, I think this manuever is just wasted money by Team Santorum. Sure, I've seen the ads - I'm in the Philly metro reason. But for Casey to start campaigning against Santurum right now is just dumb when he still has this competitive race. And I've read where Santorum isn't getting the donations like previous races.

So as far as I'm concern I hope Santorum runs more ads like this - Pennsylvania is an expensive state and he'll blow his load before democrats even pick their candidate. And if their candidate happens to be Casey, well the man has a massive war chest and can easily fight back against Tricky Rick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I understand strategy, however, I am concerned.
It's rolling the dice leaving some of this crap unanswered. And some of it appears to be coming from Casey's opponents in the primary.

It just makes me nervous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Again - this is not a time to worry
It's may, you do know that the general election is in November and that is when those ads will no longer be unanwered. It's foolish and a finanically poor movement to spend the money now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Accurate Poll ?
I really doubt the accuracy of this poll.......especially with 578 voters polled..According to Zogby and others , in order for any poll to show any validity it must have at least 1000 to 1500 participants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. It depends
the margin of error on a poll with this sample size is plus or minus 4 percentage points, 95% of the time, which means that 95% of the time the actual value will be within that eight percentage point range centered on the point prediction.

What "Zogby and others" are apparently concerned about is that, much of the time, this isn't telling you much at all, especially in national elections (for example) that are usually close enough that +/- 4 really isn't good enough. A sample size of 1,000 will give you +/- 3 and a sample size of 1,500 will give you +/- 2.5 (95% of the time. Polls in this range are more reliable, especially if you can track the results of multiple polls taken by different pollsters.

Of course, we should also remember that our 95% level of confidence means that 5% of the time, 1 time in 20, our numbers will be outside that range (i.e. way off the mark). Thus, the accuracy of any given poll is always in question, using any reasonable sample size. Poll results cannot be definitive--we do polls rather than actual censuses of the population in question because it's so much cheaper. To get to +/- 1%, you need about 8,000 respondents.

Still, it's expensive to get that many respondents, which is why you never see a 1% margin of error. In an ideal world, we would not have to rely on results with just 578 voters, but in a state race, there may be no one interested in paying the extra money to survey 1,500 people. The question therefore becomes somewhat subjective--is +/- 4% good enough in this race? Clearly, in national elections, the money should be there to develop bigger samples, but in this case, I'd say it's good enough, and typical of polls taken at the state level.

P.S. it is the accuracy that's in question here, not the validity. Validity has a quite specific meaning in statistics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. if casey cannot beat santorum after everything that has gone down
about santorum, then casey isn't getting his message out for one reason or another, which has been the problem Democrats have been having since 2000

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. Casey's getting his message out
But it doesn't resonate with me.
He's 'Old Guard' Pennsylvania politics and trying the 'Republican Lite' strategy. He's been pushed down our throats by the party despite some grassroots dissatisfaction with him.

In the primary I'll be voting for Pennachio or Sandals - Both these guys are further away from Sanctorum than Casey.

If he wins the primary I'll support him. Until then, he's not my choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well - I guess I have to move back to my birth home
to vote in this election.

Ruffled Grouse and Mountain Laurel and all of that good stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Come back...
We need you!!
P.S. Bring busloads!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. PA. pundits like to jaw, and newspapers like to quote them.
Casey and Rendell = In like Flynn.

If I were Santorum's dog, I'd be worried!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. The same thing is happening in Michigan. Dick DeVos (Amway)
is doing the same thing to Granholm. He is now leading in the polls.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_joel_wen_060504_dick_devos_3a_top_ten_.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. DeVos
barely mentions Granholm in his ads though. He is spending a lot for ad after ad about JOBS, JOBS, JOBS as Michigan continues to lose them. (Due to policies that DeVos supports)
They are effective ads and it scares me because I know how bad he would be for people and there would be no balance here. Engler privatized whatever he could and most of that went very bad, I think DeVos would be much worse than Engler.
I know we are talking the wrong state for this thread but I hope Granholm has a very effective strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. DeVos is a MAJOR dominionist ......see articles at
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I know
and that's scares me more. That's why the impression his ads are making and the polls make me very nervous.
They make him sound like he'll solve our job problems. He's not even good at that, not to mention how bad he is in all the other ways.
I hope Granholm has a good plan and a lot of campaign funds, that's all I can say. I know they met at Cobo Center recently but DeVos is running all over the state, has all those ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wow, we are "only" beating the incumbent by 6% nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. we need to factor in margin of error and EVM fraud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. negative ad campaigns work, that's why people use them
negative ads sink in much better than positive ones. The population claims to dislike negative ads.
I watched commercial tv once during the california elections last year (arnold and the propositions) and the barrage
of ads was disgusting. once was enuff.

Msongs
www.msongs.com
batik & digital art
mugs and shirts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. It is one poll, with a large margin of error.
That said, I know I will get bashed for this, but the other two candidates on the Dem side do not have a chance and for the good of the party this one election, they should bow out. They are only pushing people towards Santorum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You have a valid point, and that's the dilemma we face.
It is clear the negative ads from his opponents in the primary are affecting him which are reasonable under the circumstances, but that in conjunction with the shit flying from the Santorum camp is painting a pretty negative picture, one that I'm afraid Casey must counter now or soon.

It's a real Catch-22. Practice democracy by having a wide-open primary, but that is causing the candidates to spend a wad just to get the nod, and then they're up against the GOP machine and endless funds in the general election.

Kinda sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Anybody but me believe the immigration issue will win for Rethugs?
Dems had a fighting chance until the immigration thing busted loose. It's almost like Rove planned it and the Dems fell for it again. It only takes one hot-button issue to energize the Rethug base and illegal immigration is it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. of course Rove planned it
but it's proving to be a stinker for them. The GOP is split right down the middle on the issue. There's a saying about getting out of the way when someone is imploding.

The Dems approach is REASONABLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. We're split down the middle too
look around on DU and see all the posts that are on Rove's side of the immigration issue. Once again, they have found a wedge and are pounding away at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. If the ads are working... why isn't Casey cranking them out?
There has to be a LOT more negative material to broadcast against Santorum than Casey any day of the week.

Casey needs to "kick it up a notch" and flush Santorum out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. He has a DVD mailer campaign
right now. I think this is new, I saw it for the first time Friday night.
Not sure if buying ads right now is a good use of campaign money. With six months to go, I think the DVD is a good idea if it's widely distributed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
24. Demo's need a strategy to fight "swift boating". nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC