Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

W has a 47% Rasmussen Approval the last day of 2005

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 04:26 AM
Original message
W has a 47% Rasmussen Approval the last day of 2005
At www.Rasmussenreports.com. 52% disapprove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting
27% strongly approve
36% strongly disapprove
Kinda selective on their headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. which is too simple

The composite polling picture is Bush at 39-40% approval, 51% disapproval, and 9-10% undecided/very soft Bush supporters. Rasmussen always gets these folks other pollsters find Undecided to call their view approval.

In the six or so categories in which things seem to work, in ethics/governance, social policy, economic policy, foreign diplomacy, and military policy (Iraq) he's at 38% support, on 'handling terrorism' (which is also 'strong leader', fear of foreigners and Modernity, and other complicated ratings) he's at 49%. So 49% is his polling ceiling, 38% his floor.

There's a 1% per month phenomenon of loss of real faith in the fellow and national Republicans (they tie together in the public mind) since December 2000.

There's also trouble brewing in several areas, where moderate Republicans look to come apart from the hardliners in the next few months. It's in the ethics/governance ratings (DeLay getting convicted and the whole Texas Republican mafia thing unravelling), social policy ratings (the new laws about illegals), economic policy ratings (always about taxes- in 2006 the AMT abolition vs adjustment), foreign diplomacy ratings (the Coalition coming apart, Britain being the key loss), and Iraq (the constitutional democracy thing going bust from within). The 'handling terrorism' rating falls whenever Al Qaeda attacks successfully in the West.

The Republican situation is a hell of a lot more frail and overleveraged than either Party thinks at the moment. There's simply a moment/time of relief being felt on the conservative side of the spectrum at the official Republican line shift of November 30. They've internally lowered the bar from achieving domination of their opponents (Democrats and foreign foes) to holding their present ground- in power, majorities, voters, money- and hoping to outlast the challenges as a kind of status quo party based in providing 'national security'. The Democratic leadership is obviously having problems countering this retrenchment- the Party is too full of timid and narrow defensive people for the aggressive, broad, courageous policy stances the new situation requires.

A year from now the GOP will be a spent, dying, Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. And 74% will pray at midnight
While only 43% will have a drink. Yeah right. Just who the hell are they polling???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think there is a definite, but unmeasured and to my knowledge
unreckognized, bias in these polls based on who answers their phones. People who answer their phones when pollsters call are more likely to be the people who watch Faux news and televangelists. People who train for marathons are less likely to answer these polls because they are out running, people who have two or three jobs in order to get by in the BushCo economy don't answer because they are at work. People like me, who have dial up and one phone line don't answer because they are on the internet trying to separate the truth from all the lies we are fed.

These polls are bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meti57b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Pollkatz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. Historical Speculation, What Would The 1944 French Approvals Have Been?
Looking back at history, I wonder what the approval ratings for France's Nazi collaborationist Vichy regime would have been circa May, 1944.

If an honest poll could have been taken, how many French voters would have voted in the follwoing way?

Marshal Petain: strongly approve

Marchal Petain: somewhat approve

Marshal Petain: somewhat disapprove

Marshal Petain: strongly disapprove

For those who don't remember their history, France was liberated after the June, 1944 D-Day landings and the Vichy government was routed by August of that year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Trending in low 40% range
up until just before Christmas. I'm sure the holidays make opinions seem nicer, but its a temporary blip.

http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC