Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Bush eavesdrop on Kerry campaign in 2004?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:58 AM
Original message
Poll question: Did Bush eavesdrop on Kerry campaign in 2004?
Ed Schultz brought up the idea and I think it certainly is possible. The excuse would be that they were "defending America" by spying on the enemy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would be surprised if he didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That should be one of the choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. NY Times is reporting today widespread surveillance by FBI of YOU!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1997351

Unbelievable, the FBI has outdone what J. Edgar Hoover did! They even snooped on a Catholic group because of their "semi-communistic" ideas. FBI also spied on political websites, such as Greenpeace and others.

The NY Times sat on this story for a full year. It could have reported this before the 2004 Elections!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I remember the rumors of a full-blown story like this that never released
It was about a week before Election Day that rumors of a story about the Bush administration was going to be released...and it never did. Hell, there are so many stories of corruption that have been released since then, but this story would have utterly destroyed the Bush campaign if it had been released a day or two before Election Day. No BBVs could have been able to recover and steal what might have been 20-30% win by Kerry...

The truth does eventually ALWAYS get out though...history is going to remind future generations how absolutely corrupt and EVIL Bush was. We just have to make sure justice weighs down hard and fierce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. If he did, he wouldn't be stupid enough to use the NSA for it
and anyway Rove would be the one in contact with the private sector companies offering to inspect Senator Kerry's diary and toilet paper. Bushler himself wouldn't get involved, or even know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why would he need to? Rove had the swifboat thing going...
...and besides, Bush wins elections by election fraud. He could win against Gandhi if he needed to.

If this wiretapping story isn't just smoke and mirrors, at the most I'd guess they were eavesdropping on journalists rather than politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. You have to actually ask the question?
I KNOW they did.

I EXPECT them to do it.

I LEARNED that our wimpy dems DID NOTHING!

Paging dicky durbin - dicky durbin you apology is needed NOW!

Paging dicky durbin......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. Read this post up at Digby's
me thinks it had more local and partisan uses then we realize......

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2005_12_18_digbysblog_ar...

Several senior government officials say that when the special operation first began, there were few controls on it and little formal oversight outside the N.S.A. The agency can choose its eavesdropping targets and does not have to seek approval from Justice Department or other Bush administration officials. Some agency officials wanted nothing to do with the program, apparently fearful of participating in an illegal operation, a former senior Bush administration official said. Before the 2004 election, the official said, some N.S.A. personnel worried that the program might come under scrutiny by Congressional or criminal investigators if Senator John Kerry, the Democratic nominee, was elected president.

I wonder who they might have been monitoring in 2004?

More and more, Bush is reminding me of Richard Nixon.....with updated plumber technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. They didn't need to
They had enough DLC'ers fucking up the campaign who reported back to their real bosses at the GOP headquarters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. The consequences of taking........
Probably checking out a lot of other things illegally also, but what else would you expect from a corrupt government run a muck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. why wouldn't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. I want to know who voted for the clean fair campaign!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Who in the hell thinks bush** ran a clean campaign? That's proof that
we have either one damn idiot or one damn freeper here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I'm guessing it was the temptation to act like a Repug for a sec
Hopefully the person had nightmares of being trapped in a Bush supporter's body. That would indeed be scary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. YES.
Here is why. He spied on a gazillion peace activists. Many (maybe not even most, but many) peace activists supported Kerry and some would have worked on his campaign. So whether by design or coincidence Bush's people were spying on parts of the Kerry campaign. If his people received such campaign strategy information by coincidence (and not by design) what do you think they would do with it?

These intel guys probably do not have the time to analyze and read everything they get. Especially now with the Patriot Act. But I think that odds are very much in favor of the Administration either spying on the Kerry campaign by design or by coincidence. In the coincidence scenario, they might not have realized to this day that they had this campaign info in their databases of paperwork. Or they may have seen it. Who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. Would Not Surprise Me
I would not be surprised if it came out that he did spy on the Kerry Campaign. I have begun to think that Bush just spied on his rivals and that is why he did not go to the courts. They courts probably would not have given him the right to spy on his rivals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hyernel Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. The only thing stopping them would be a sense of honor...
...and integrity. I think we can all follow that to it's obvious conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. I sure wouldn't be surprised
I would like to think that Kerry represented at least as much of much of a threat to Bushco as a bunch of vegans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
19. Why, it would be a matter of national security!
To end to war on terror and give control over to "Mr. Flip Flop" who would have other countries tell us "global test" if we could defend ourselves?????

It would be our DUTY to eavesdrop on them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. Amazed at results.... and what I'd like to see is...
...whether Freepers think that Bush should have tapped Kerry's phones and spied on him because they actually believe the Swiftboat liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I would doubt they believed the liars
because they likely assisted them in setting things up. Also, just as Nixon asked the Secretary of the Navy (who was John Warner, now a Senator) to check all Kerry's records to be disappointed that he apparently was a totally clean, very highly praised officer, I assume that Bush did the same. (His father looked at Clinton's records.)

Also, Douglas Brinkley who wrote the Tour of Duty book was a Tulane University Historian. Because he came away so impressed by Kerry - that the book is almost taken as a campaign biography - which it wasn't and Kerry accepted having NO editorial rights. I think it was just the Rove strategy of going straight at a Kerry strength.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. It wouldn't surprise me
I hope the ACLU files a FOIA and finds out all they can on who the White House deemed was a terrorist threat and illegally wired tapped their phones. Then I hope those persons bring charges against the White House. I'm not sure how all that would play out but maybe someone with legal experience could start a post with their opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC