Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

sound familiar? fate of Iraqi oil being decided behind closed doors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 09:55 PM
Original message
sound familiar? fate of Iraqi oil being decided behind closed doors
Crude Designs:
The Rip-Off of Iraq’s Oil Wealth
By Greg Muttitt

<<snip>>

Executive Summary

While the Iraqi people struggle to define their future amid political chaos and violence, the fate of their most valuable economic asset, oil, is being decided behind closed doors.

This report reveals how an oil policy with origins in the US State Department is on course to be adopted in Iraq, soon after the December elections, with no public debate and at enormous potential cost. The policy allocates the majority (1) of Iraq’s oilfields – accounting for at least 64% of the country’s oil reserves – for development by multinational oil companies.

Iraqi public opinion is strongly opposed to handing control over oil development to foreign companies. But with the active involvement of the US and British governments a group of powerful Iraqi politicians and technocrats is pushing for a system of long term contracts with foreign oil companies which will be beyond the reach of Iraqi courts, public scrutiny or democratic control.

COSTING IRAQ BILLIONS

projections published here for the first time show that the model of oil development that is being proposed will cost Iraq hundreds of billions of dollars in lost revenue, while providing foreign companies with enormous profits.

Our key findings are:
*At an oil price of $40 per barrel, Iraq stands to lose between $74 billion and $194 billion over the lifetime of the proposed contracts (2), from only the first 12 oilfields to be developed. These estimates, based on conservative assumptions, represent between two and seven times the current Iraqi government budget.

*Under the likely terms of the contracts, oil company rates of return from investing in Iraq would range from 42% to 162%, far in excess of usual industry minimum target of around 12% return on investment.

complete report by Global Policy Forum
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2005/crudedesigns.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueAwards Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. [sarcasm] Absolutely Stunned! [/sarcasm] nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anyone have questions on why W & Blair invaded Iraq?
This should answer them. W is not the head of the U.S. He is the head of the global corporatists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IowaGuy Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Boy, couldn't see that one coming from about 100 miles out....
yeah right, it's not about the oil.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. but the oil...
is paying for the war.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbane Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. So that's where Dr. Strangelove..errr.. the Vice President has been.
The same way he did the our "energy policy" and the "Patriot Act".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good Ol' Ahmed Chalabi
is currently the deputy minister in charge of Iraqi oil. Does anyone know if the upcoming elections will change this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. what a joke...
but what else can we expect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Paydirt time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC