|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
win_in_06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 06:14 AM Original message |
Another "Near Miss" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 06:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah right, so how many number 3s are they going to catch???? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boredtodeath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
2. Wait! I'm confused! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
win_in_06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 06:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I'm sure there was military involvement. The CIA role was probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 06:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. J.F.K was going to give the C I A a role ,,fired! Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
win_in_06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 06:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Who was fired? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 07:02 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Anyone not in the " Good Old Boy Network " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
win_in_06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 07:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. I'm not following you, are you saying JFK fired someone. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 08:01 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I mean within virtually minutes of disintegration, of the whole Agency, why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
win_in_06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 08:14 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Oh, you're saying the CIA had JFK assasinated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 08:54 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Not only that, but I Believe it bought the favors that have brought us to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 07:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. the CIA owns and operates many Predators which now have missile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy M (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 06:37 AM Response to Original message |
3. I guess we are making progress, we finally got to a No. 3!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 06:40 AM Response to Original message |
4. Evil elf Russert will be substantiating that possible pseudo fact sunday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
win_in_06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 07:32 AM Response to Original message |
10. Hmmm. CNN is reporting that he died in an "explosion" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 07:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Oops. Guess the MSNBC minders were sleeping on the job and let facts out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
win_in_06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 07:40 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I wonder if its a missile attack that is being covered up or vice versa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 08:21 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. To the Pakistani government, it's much more useful to call it an accident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
win_in_06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 09:31 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Well at least it appears the CIA has accomplished something good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 09:36 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Who knows..I hope you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
win_in_06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-03-05 10:02 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I'm sure there was "collateral damage" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC