70% of vote--73 No pulling away, now down 85,300 votes!

[Gloria]

eom

[snowbear]

1. Yeaaah hahh...

All of them > http://vote2005.ss.ca.gov/Returns/prop/00.htm

:bounce: :toast:

[FrenchieCat]

2. Good!

:thumbsup:

My young daughter and I had a conversation about that proposition. She heard about it at her high school. Asked me how I had voted. Told her I voted NO on all of Arnold's doo-doo stains on the ballot!

[bliss_eternal]

3. I bet your daughter was proud

to have a smart, progressive mom! :hi:

[FrenchieCat]

4. She'll be even prouder, now that it has been defeated....

Thanks for the compliment! I appreciate that! :hi:

[bliss_eternal]

5. Anytime--

:hug:

Always plenty of compliments for progressives that practice what they preach!

:hi: Good to see you!

[IntravenousDemilo]

6. What is proposition 73?

[mrdmk]

7. Here is a link to all of them, 73 is the Abortion for Minors Prop.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-propositions-sg,0,5554767.storygallery?coll=la-home-politics

<snip>
73. If passed, the proposal would amend the California Constitution to bar abortions for women younger than 18 years old until 48 hours after her physician notifies a parent or legal guardian. Proponents, including the California Catholic Conference of Bishops and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, argue that parents have a right to know if their minor daughters seek abortions. Without secret access to abortion, teenagers will avoid "reckless behavior" that can lead to pregnancy, they say. Opponents, including the California Medical Assn. and the California National Organization for Women, contend that laws cannot compel healthy family communication. Teenagers afraid to tell their parents, or confused about how to obtain a judicial waiver, will face health risks from self-induced or later-term abortions, they say.
<end of snip>