Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are about oil. Period.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 12:36 PM
Original message
The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are about oil. Period.
Sorry, just thought I'd post a little reminder. At the moment, I'm reading 'Confessions of an Economic Hitman' by John Perkins and thought I should bring it up. In case anyone is confused, foreign aid is doled out to benefit industry and not the average citizens of the country the aid is going to. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are about control over natural resources and nothing about fighting terrorism. Lei capice?

I'm just saying....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. look at the US base locations in Afghanistan and the new oil pipeline ...
Edited on Tue Nov-01-05 01:04 PM by welshTerrier2
they're side-by-side ...

the US military is a private security force paid for by the American taxpayer for the sole benefit of Big Oil ... our troops are stationed on bases all over the world to procure and protect sources of oil ...

if you really want to be blown away after you read "Confessions", read "Sorrows of Empire" by Chalmers Johnson ... it's a bit more dense than Confessions (and less first-hand narrative story-like) and covers a much wider range of time and events ...

until the Democratic Party acknowledges we are in a war with corporatist, imperialist exploitation and confronts the enemy head on, nothing will change ... little policy ideas, like looking into price gouging at the gas pump, miss the big picture ... we need to create "context" for these battles ...

and look at how badly the Democrats have handled the war in Iraq ... they've done a good job highlighting bush's incompetent leadership ... he's failed miserably ... but they still refuse to QUESTION HIS MOTIVES ... they enable the PNAC agenda by failing to point out that bush's motives were not to protect us from terrorists or to install a democracy ... it was all about oil and regional control ... but that's too scary for politicians who want to play it safe ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. And what this means is that SUSTAINABILITY has got to be the one word
that's the test of a real leader. If whoever is running for office does not use the word "sustainability" as an integral part of his or her speechmaking, platform, talking points, what have you.... that politician does not deserve your vote.

The eventual shift away from an oil-based economy is truly THE ONLY HOPE FOR OUR SPECIES. Anything else is just terra terra or pure bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good book
Sheds light on why Wolfowitz has become our World Bank rep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. there's no oil in Afghanistan
and does anyone have an updated link on the progress of the pipeline there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No progress, just a lot of talk.
Oil theory makes sense for Iraq, but not for Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sure it makes sense for two reasons:
Edited on Tue Nov-01-05 01:03 PM by bowens43
1.In order to control the oil in Iran, bases in Afghanstan are esential.
2. The gas pipeline. The deal has been made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. So what you are saying is
1. an invasion of Iran, to control the oil, depends on the essential bases in Afghanistan.

2. there is a deal for a gas pipeline in a country without gas. Who is constructing it? I'd like to know so I can see if I own shares and sell them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. What I am saying is
Edited on Tue Nov-01-05 01:21 PM by bowens43
that an invasion of Iran is much easier if you have bases in Afghanistan and the pipeline which has been planned for decades passes through Afghanistan to pakistan. It originates near the Caspian sea where what may be the worlds largest natural gas deposit is located. US companies have invested billions in this project in the past. They intend to reap some benefits.

google is your friend......

here's a little info to get you started.
http://www.ringnebula.com/Oil/Timeline.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Google is friendly.....

September 1, 2005 EurasiaNet Commentary

Indian officials are interested in the trans-Afghan pipeline (TAP) project, which would ship natural gas in Turkmenistan via Afghanistan to markets in Pakistan and India. The project has long been hampered by questions concerning pipeline security and the extent of Turkmenistan’s reserves. According to Turkmen media sources, the country’s president, Saparmurat Niyazov, discussed TAP’s prospects with visiting US Gen. John Abizaid, who visited Ashgabat in late August.

During an August 28 visit to Afghanistan, Prime Minister Singh said (.......) during a joint news conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai. "We need both pipelines. ... India’s needs for commercial energy are increasing at an explosive rate."


No news on if it started or a deal was reached. So its a plan to provide India with oil. And congress is discussing the deal Bush made to give India nuclear technology too. hmmmmmm makes you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Natural gas and oil are two different things. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. There is also oil oil in the caspian sea.
No, they're really not two different things. The motivation is the same. The companies involved are the same. The people involved are the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Can your car run on natural gas? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. It's not for YOUR car or YOUR house
It's for the oil company's wallets. None of this has anything to do with supplying the US with petroleum -- it's all about supplying the petroleum multinationals with petroleum.

They'll sell to whoever will pay the most. Look at the oil pumped out of Alaska, for example. You think much of that comes down here? Nope. Most of it ends up being sold to Asia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Not one worker has been paid one hour for construction of that
pipeline.

If they invade Iran, they control Iran's sea port.

Theory debunked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbane Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Natural gas
lots of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. No evidence that we went to war for natural gas instead of
because the rulers of Afghanistan were harboring Al-Qaeda despite repeated demands from the world community and UN sanctions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Keep telling yourself that...
history says otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. If by "history" you mean empty and unsubstantiated speculation,
yeah you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. The war in Afghanistan has nothing to do with terrorism.
The captains of industry want a pipeline. Al Qaeda provided the excuse to go in there. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. If you say so. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I don't say so - it is so.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Thanks for clearing that up. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. you kiddin' me?
Afganistan has been about that natural gas pipeline from the start and the US has just traded one band of thugs for another as far as which warlords are in charge. We haven't done much to aleviate the suffering of most of the people and as far as capturing bad guys to send to Gitmo a lot of them were farmers that were sold for a bounty.IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Nope. No credible evidence has ever emerged that we invaded Afghanistan
because of a natural gas pipeline instead of because of AQ.

People are free to believe it, but it's a belief based in faith, not logic and evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. The "wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan are lost.
It's just a matter of time until the Afghans and Iraqis give us the well-deserved boot out of their countries.

No doubt, that the "wars" are about oil and the control of natural resources (not to mention politician's need to flaunt the invisible contents of their jockstraps by being "tough on terror") but, the folks in those countries have other ideas about what constitutes "democracy" and "freedom" with soldiers killing their citizenry and blowing up their houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Great book...
I read it a couple of months ago... Perkins is dead-ON!
Love his label - corporatocracy! to describe our form of govt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbane Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. The only way we win is if the oil starts pumping...cheap oil!
And that's the bottom line. To hell with all this spreading Democracy crap. Iraq is about oil and anybody that thinks otherwise is not paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Check out this movie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sepia_steel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. I saw 'Good Night and Good Luck' last night
(the last night out for us for awhile, i'm afraid) and I saw something that has me so excited I can't freaking wait. George Clooney's making another movie about OIL. You saw shots of Saudis, Presidents, key figures getting whacked, corrupt oil tycoons, THE WHOLE THING.

CLOONEY IS ON A ROLL!!! "God bless him," I whispered to the hubby.

The film is called 'Syriana' (if I spelled that correctly). Google it and find a trailer; I was amazed! You will be excited...

I love the smell of truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drduffy Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
29.  a late comment... yes
it is all about oil, nat. gas, global hegemony.

go here: http://www.newhumanist.com/oil.html

any many other sites provide the data. The war on 'terra' is a ruse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. That and geopolitical advantage- the neocons thought that having
military bases in an Iraq under our control would somehow beat the Iranians into submission to our will and secure the region.

Of course they forgot about the Saudi's funding insurgents against us, and they misclaculated how Iraq under US occupation.

It's oil and plain old power grubbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC