Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The best Dem candidates vs. these possible GOP candidates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 09:18 AM
Original message
The best Dem candidates vs. these possible GOP candidates
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 09:19 AM by WI_DEM
If the GOP nominated Sen. McCain the democrats would be better off nominating Gen. Clark. Why? McCain will make much of his military/POW past and to counter it we have Gen. Clark who also has a stellar military record. While McCain is a strong hawk on Iraq, Clark opposed the war. It would be an epic battle of the gray hairs.

What if Rudy were somehow nominated? (according to a recent poll he leads in NH)then I would say our best hope would be John Edwards. Why? Rudy has the 9/11 thing going for him, but he also has very strong character problems. Let's not forget that while he was Mayor and married he was carrying on an affair and living in the apartment of another woman. Why would Edwards be a good counter balance? Because Edwards has a squeeky clean private life with the same wife for years and a good looking family. Also, the GOP can't say that Edwards doesn't have enough experience. His term in the US Senate and experience as Kerry's VP nominee is worth Rudy's time as Mayor of New York City. (Somebody who has only been a Mayor has never gone all the way to the presidency). (Also, Rudy would probably make headroads in the Northeast, but he might not sell as well in the south, and Edwards as a southerner might be able to pick up some southern states to make up for the possibility of losing NY).

What if the Repukes nominated Condi? Hate to say it, but I think that the best candidate v. Condi would be Hillary. It would be a first--two women nominated. Some Dems worry that Condi would siphon off portions of the African-American vote, but Hillary is a "Clinton" and Bill has a terrific amount of affection in the African-American community and that could help Hillary. On the other hand, Condi is identified with "W" who only has a 2% approval rating among African-Anmericans.

What if Frist, Gingrich, Brownback, or Romney were nominated? I believe any credible democrat could beat any of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very interesting analysis....I find myself agreeing with you
on practically every point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC