apparent story, that Rove may have agreed to take the fall, if necessary--that's how bad it is--and that it all points to Cheney and weapons profiteering, and illicit Bush Cartel weapons movements around the globe, and perhaps to a plot to plant WMDs in Iraq (for political gain--after the invasion; and in other places, like Syria, now).
See "Plame...the tip of the iceberg..." (Plame maybe investigating Cheney arms deals when they busted her CIA weapons op)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2178477#2180220What is the thing that both Bush and Blair most needed in summer '03? A find of WMDs in Iraq. Were these guys capable of conceiving and implementing a plan to plant them there? I think the answer is, of course they were! (I kept wondering that summer why they hadn't!) And who would be in a prime position to detect such a plot?--Valerie Plame and her 20 year CIA covert eyes and ears WMD network.
I think it's possible that Rovian revenge against Wilson is a cover story, and that disabling Plame and her WMD network was the primary goal.
I am also struck by the coincidence of dates between two apparently unrelated events: the outing of Valerie Plame by Novak on July 14, 2003, and the death of Brit WMD expert, Dr. David Kelly, three days later on July 17, 2003, under highly suspicious circumstances. (Kelly was whistleblowing on the Blair gov't WMD exaggerations.) Strangely, the common figure in these two events is Judith Miller.
See "More about Judith Miller" (Miller/Plame/David Kelly)
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/7/3/17138/30618As for Rove, I don't know if he can be indicted (apparently Judith Miller is protecting him), but I would say this, about the news monopolies: wherever they are pointing, look the other way, or behind them, or to the side. (In this case, look for the master misdirectionist, Cheney.) The news monopolies have been SO BAD on this war and on the Bush Cartel that they CANNOT BE TRUSTED, even now, as some of them suddenly seem to be doing the job for which we have given them the use of our public airwaves.
You are RIGHT to distrust this story, and to look for misdirection! But I think that what's being hidden from view is far, far worse than a plot of embarrass Democrats.
------
Re: Kerry. I don't think the National Guard story hurt Kerry. I think it infused passion and determination into anti-Bush voters, some of whom stood for ten hours in line to vote, and tens of thousands of whom went out of their way to get all their non-voting family members, co-workers and friends to register and vote THIS TIME. (The Dems blew the Repubs away in new voter registration in 2004, nearly 60/40.) And I think the failure of that story to hurt Kerry was what prompted Rove to implement his backup plan (Plan B) for stealing the election (overt vote suppression in Ohio). Plan A was Bushite companies owning and controlling the secret, proprietary vote tabulation software, and controlling and preprogamming the paperless electronic voting machines (one third of the country). Plan C was a phony "terrorist alert" to shut down the vote on the west coast (well prepped prior to the election with many phony "terrorist alerts" planted in the news; and with Cheney taking off for Hawaii two days before the election possibly being an element of Plan C). Plans A and B were sufficient to overcome Kerry's 10% margin of victory, and Plan C wasn't needed (except in Warren County, Ohio, where a phony "terrorist alert" was used to evict all observers from the vote count).
But I suppose it's possible that the National Guard B.S. (and a couple of other things, like Kerry's support for the Iraq war) could have cost Kerry some of the 15% to 20% margin of victory that he needed to overcome election fraud Plans A and B. (My husband believes this, that Kerry needed a 20% margin of victory to win, and could have gotten it if he'd been more antiwar and more populist; but I think if he'd won that big, they would have gone to Plan C.) (No way they were going to give up the White House--they are much, much too dirty, the lot of them.)
----------
The answer to the stink in Washington DC is restoring our right to vote, by throwing Bushite electronic voting machine companies--Diebold, ES&S and brethren--out of the election business NOW--or, at the least, achieving some measure of election transparency with paper ballot backups, no secret programming code and strict auditing. The only place where we can get that done is in state/local jurisdictions, where the authority over election systems still resides, and where ordinary people still have some say. See the DU Forum "2004 Election Results and Discussion" for information and action ideas:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203