Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean and Clark as John the Baptists?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:11 PM
Original message
Dean and Clark as John the Baptists?
Thanks to gore-is-my-president, there is a thread in the forum about the Krugman op-ed abstracted below:

EDITORIAL DESK | January 16, 2004, Friday
Who Gets It?

By PAUL KRUGMAN (NYT) 752 words
Late Edition - Final , Section A , Page 21 , Column 1
ABSTRACT - Paul Krugman Op-Ed column says Wesley Clark and Howard Dean, whatever they may say in heat of nomination fight, are on same side of great Democratic divide between those who are willing to question not just policies but also honesty and motives of Bush administration, and those who are not; says what makes Dean, and now Clark, seem radical are not their policy positions but their willingness to take hard line against Bush administration; says Democratic candidate cannot expect many corporate contributions because Republicans control all three branches of government, and even corporate types with grave misgivings about Bush administration are afraid to give money to Democrats; says Democratic candidate will have chance of winning only if he has energized base that is willing to contribute money in many small donations, willing to contribute its own time, and willing to stand up for candidate in face of smear tactics and unfair news coverage (M)

http://query.nytimes.com/search/abstract?res=F20A16FA35540C758DDDA80894DC404482&n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists%2fPaul%20Krugman

I believe the explanation for both Dean's and Clark's difficulties on the campaign trail can be found to some degree in what Krugman has written. If neither of them succeed in winning the nomination, does it mean that they will have served as John the Baptists, delivering a message from their wilderness as outsiders, as inexperienced players on the national political stage? If they falter, can smoother-talking, more politically acceptable messengers stand on their shoulders and lead us to victory? Or would the message not be powerful enough, as Krugman fears, to rouse the people?

Just some thoughts, brought to mind by the Biblical reference in Cuban-liberal's thread about wishing for a Moses, and not a Messiah....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Found a Full, Free Copy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC