Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"because they wouldn't have to trim hedges and cut grass,"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 12:04 PM
Original message
"because they wouldn't have to trim hedges and cut grass,"

Senator George Allen (R-VA) may have gotten in a bit over his head, this morning, on Meet the Press. On private accounts, he suggested that Americans might have to sell their homes to survive in retirement. But, that would be a good thing, because they wouldn't have to trim hedges and cut grass, he noted.

http://www.sundaymorningtalk.com/smt/2005/05/sen_allen_sell_.html



seniors should cut the tip of Allen's tongue off with trimming shears.

Allen's constituents should know he said that - how about a billboard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it DFA that erected two in Texas for DeLay?
Edited on Tue May-03-05 12:09 PM by paineinthearse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. What a remarkably stupid thing to say. And
this is supposed to encourage Americans to want SS privatization?
A billboard would be hilarious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. George Allen is a prime candidate...
... for a colonoscopy without anesthetic or lubrication.

Stupid is as stupid does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smurfygirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm nominating this. Every republican should read this
thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. sounds like a great argument for euthanasia
yup, no hedge trimming--EVER!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why didn't Senator Allen just say,
"Let 'em eat cake!" That's what he MEANT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's the full quote from the MTP transcript >
A billboard is a great idea.

==========

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7698687/

SEN. ALLEN: I do not care to reduce the retirement security for those particularly middle-income working people. I think what we ought to be looking at is ways to enhance and strengthen their ability to save for themselves, be responsible in the case they need assisted living.

MR. RUSSERT: Well, then, you have to raise taxes. You either have to cut benefits or raise taxes.

SEN. ALLEN: There are a variety of other options that can be looked at as far as the solvency of Social Security, but then there are others...

MR. RUSSERT: Such as?

SEN. ALLEN: Oh, you could look at a lot of different things.

MR. RUSSERT: Raise eligibility age?

SEN. ALLEN: That's one.

MR. RUSSERT: Cost-of-living increases?

SEN. ALLEN: Correct.

MR. RUSSERT: You'd look at all those?

SEN. ALLEN: Well, I think they all have to be on the table and see the entire package. But then you also need to look at a package that also ought to be looking at making sure that investments in stocks or bonds or others, are--the taxes are low so that people of, let's say, middle or lower income can avail themselves of these investments. And moreover, in the event that a personal savings account approach is taken, allowing them to invest in a home in addition to right now it's stocks, bonds and other financial instruments, if people can invest in their own home, they'll know it. They'll understand it. They'll take care of it. And they'll enjoy it and they don't have to worry about mergers and acquisitions and scandals and market share. And by the time they retire, they're going to have a pretty good nest egg there and they don't need as big a house, usually, because they don't want to be cutting grass and trimming hedges, and that is good for the economy as well. So I'd want to look at as a broad package, not just in the narrow aspect of Social Security, which is important, but also let's look at other ways, additional ways to allow working people in this country to save for their own retirement.

==========


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC