Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RNC Chair sides with DeLay/Santorum/Cornyn on judges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:02 PM
Original message
RNC Chair sides with DeLay/Santorum/Cornyn on judges
Mehlman's going with the culture vultures and against some other GOP leadership, like...oh, Frist and Cheney and Roberts

snip>
Questioned about his remarks Tuesday, Cornyn said: "The American people have to understand how the judiciary, in some instances ... has become more of a policy-making body rather than a traditional court of law."

Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman echoed the point in an interview. He said "unelected and unaccountable judges" were taking decisions away from the American people as expressed by their elected representatives.

"I believe very strongly that one of the reasons we have ... culture wars today is because decisions that ought to be democratically made are taken out of the democratic process and instead are made by unaccountable judges," Mehlman said.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2270&ncid=1278&e=6&u=/krwashbureau/20050405/ts_krwashbureau/_bc_judges_wa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Like unaccountable judges
that appointed * chimperor in 2000?


http://www.kliljedahl.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's how the founding fathers set it up, dumbass.
Not EVERYTHING should be decided just by votes because dumb and mean people can be easily persuaded and demagogued to vote in ways that can hurt others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even Cheney says DeLay's remarks inappropriate.
http://www.democrats.org/blog/comment/00011827.html#comments

Cheney: DeLay's threats inappropriate
"If you ask us, threatening federal judges is a lot worse than "inappropriate." But it's nice to see Vice President Cheney saying even that much about House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's promise that federal judges will "answer for their behavior" in the Terry Schiavo case.

Cheney's comments are a sign of the cracks that are forming in the GOP unity when it comes to Tom DeLay. With scandals piling up, DeLay needs all the support he can get. Looks like he may not have the White House behind him."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. So did Sens Frist and Roberts
WASHINGTON - Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said Tuesday that federal judges gave the Terri Schiavo case "a fair and independent look," distancing himself from other Republicans who contend that the courts' refusal to keep the brain-damaged Florida woman alive is evidence of an out-of-control judiciary.
.....
Last week, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, said federal judges "thumbed their nose at Congress and the president." He warned: "The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior, but not today."

Other Republicans said such rhetoric was counterproductive.

"I think that's pretty dangerous ground to even think about," Sen. Pat Roberts (news, bio, voting record), R-Kan., said about comments such as Santorum's and DeLay's. "I'm not a party to that, and I think those comments are not helpful."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2270&ncid=1278&e=6&u=/krwashbureau/20050405/ts_krwashbureau/_bc_judges_wa

It's a fissure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry Ken, you must be thinking about how judgeships work in
fascist, totalitarian states. We've set up Judges to be independent of the prevailing public sentiment, otherwise we'd be burdened with activist judges who check polls before deciding cases.

But damn right you ought to be worried....when we take power again, we'll be going after the criminals who have been screwing this country blind for the last 10 years or so. You best hope you can get your cronies in before we take back the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Judiciary-part of the checks & balances system
Judges were never meant to be political operatives of a political party as Delay, et al want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. The American people have to understand how the judiciary
in some instances ... has become more of a policy-making body rather than a traditional court of law."

It's called common law fuckhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tofubo Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. we used to be governed
by the concept of majority rules, but the minority have rights
now it is, the majority rules, the minority are screwed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. someone needs to publish the goods on Mehlman. He's the
damned bastard I've seen in a long time. In a culture war, he's going to be among the first blasted away. He doesn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC