|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
katmondoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:01 PM Original message |
Gonzales 36 nay 60 yea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. what Dems voted for him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4_Legs_Good (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Salazar said he would vote yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. but the heading says 36 nay and 60 yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiviaOlivia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Dems who voted yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. How embarrassing for them...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4_Legs_Good (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Thanks for the list! Were there any NOs among the repubs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edgewater_Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:12 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. What?! A Repunk Voting AGAINST Dear Leader?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demwing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:17 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. Landrieu? hell...I thought better of her. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
34. an ABSOLUTE disgrace - ya damn right, we will remember |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
35. They are all New Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 06:21 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. Just remember that some of the ones who get "New Dem" flak voted NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 06:17 PM Response to Reply #13 |
40. Luh-luh-luh-loooooooooserrrrrs! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Deleted message |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Wow, you guys are out in full force today! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. I noticed that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. go back to freeperville |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kazak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Sure has been nice having you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Your assistance is not necessary. Thank you very much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. Aren't you afraid of being brainwashed, being here? ....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
One Taste (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
4. Ashcroft remains king asshole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TApprentice (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. Wow. Even Ashcroft got 42!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. The Dems had six more Senators at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jfern (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:14 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. 5 with Jeffords |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Actually, in early 2001, we had fifty Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jfern (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:50 PM Response to Reply #26 |
38. Yes, and we have 45 today with Jeffords |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
10. Well that just sucks that some Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I heard Landrieu. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. I was blasted for even saying that earlier. All Dems are good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
12. Whitewashing the obscenity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
18. What Senators didn't vote?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lizardking (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
22. Pugs impersonating Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CindyDale (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
28. 36 senators have either a brain and/or a heart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
this_side_up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
29. who did not vote? This info is just as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiviaOlivia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:34 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Bill Nelson did vote yes- on edit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bgb217 (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:36 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Who voted yea/nay/didn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. And why didn't they vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CindyDale (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. OK, they said he had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:48 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Asscrack was seen as a sick joke but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coreystone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:44 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. I could be wrong, but, I think that C-SPAN2 had a "subscript"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
39. Torture Boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
42. I'm happy--36 out of 41 ain't bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
43. Hey, they are getting off their knees and that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC