"They just said no": Washington Times on Rice vote
I noticed that the print edition of today's Washington Times had photographs of all Democratic senators who voted against the confirmation of Condoleezza Rice. I couldn't help wondering if such a prominent placement of the photos -- above the fold, no less -- was meant to inflame readers and ensure harassment (or worse) of the senators in question.
Link is below. I'm not sure how long it is good for, however. The caption was "They just said no."
Nevertheless, I think the 13 who voted against the Rice confirmation deserve recognition. They deserve to be front page news. (I suspect it was not the Washington Times's objective to glorify them.)
I believe he is in charge of the editorial pages, which cover four pages (!). Of course, there are some of us who believe the whole paper is an op-ed piece. :-)
The Washington Times is a money-losing proposition and is propped up financially by Rev. Moon. It's the kind of paper that can manage to insult both feminists and Muslims in the same editorial (which they managed to do when Richard Grenier was alive and writing for them).
5. Of course. The Moonie Times has been a Bush Crime Family tool 25 yrs.
They aren't about to turn over a new leaf.
Tony Blankley has been all over the shows defending Maggie Gallagher because the WH paid her for promoting their marriage program. The WH marriage program is based on RevMoon's marriage program. The WH tapped Wase Horn, a frequent Moon marriage seminar speaker, to oversee the program.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.