Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jon Stewart has it right!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:07 PM
Original message
Jon Stewart has it right!
Wonders why Rumsfield isn't on trial for ordering torture...(applause)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Salon has just printed a scandal sheet of Bush's er...scandals.
Just completely unbelievable how crooked this Bush administration is, and all the media can do is blame Clinton. What a strange world we live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But, but, but... Clinton lied about sex in front of a Grand Jury!
Don't you see how serious that was! My God, you Liberuls are so ignorent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, but no doinkers were harmed in that lie
were they.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes they were! Clinton besmirched the presidency.
Jesus cried when Clinton lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And yet, Mr. Happy was still ... happy
Willy the one-eyed wonder worm reigned supreme!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jon Stewart
is a very smart man. He is hits it dead on every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh Lordy - Jon is cooking
Guest tonight is talking about the balls and parties this week as an ethics free zone this week. Brian Ross of ABC reports on corporate scandal and the corruption of money in Washington. Where has this guy been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. no kidding!
He actually looks like he enjoys screwing the shrub and his shrubbies! I'm loving this! Corporate scandal=corrupt $/Washington=Coronation! Nice way to connect the dots!:toast: Have one on me, Dem 4 Ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. NO FUCKING SPOILERS FOR THOSE OF US WHO HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL 11 PST!!!!!!!!!
Please and thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbartch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Some of don't have Dish Network or Cable
PLEASE POST ALL THE SPOILERS YOU WANT......Some of us want to hear Jon Stewart telling it...LIKE IT IS!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Then they should say something in their subject line, like, oh, I dunno...
"spoiler," perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. oops...hey I'm really sorry-
didn't think about time differences!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Happens every night.
Don't worry 'bout it.

But if I catch you doing it again....OOH!

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. thanks for the warning!!!!
Peace!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wabeewoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks for the post
I would have missed it thinking this was a holiday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveright Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. in all honesty
Ramsfeld didn't authorize torture that was going on in Abu Graib (beatings, rapes, murders, humiliation). It happened because of his negligence if anything, failure to prevent it from happening by doing nothing while he surely suspected that something like that was happening (providing the climate), and unfortunately voters didn't fire him along with Bush. He did authorize stuff like 'stress positions', sleep deprivation, and loud music, and he is quite open about that, its not criminal because pentagon basically looked around to see how they can torture people without it technically being torture (as it is defined in some internation and domestic regulations). Then again, you have to interrogate people somehow and it has to be extremely unpleasant, unless you hold the position that no enemy prisoner should be interrogated at all.

I have been hearing that there are several higher ranking officers, including intelligence, that had direct control and oversight over that prison will be charged as well.

One thing that nobody talks about is that many interrogators and intelligence people in Iraq prisons were privately contracted from various security corporations. This administration is truly insane, they really believe that if you privatise something it is good, they outsourced many CIA functions to corporations, and democrats need to start talking about how dangerous this kind of no-limit conservative ideology can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Rummy MORE than suspected
He knew. Because just like in every other case when members of this administration have claimed not to know something godawful was going on right under their noses, he never responded with the expected outrage -- just squirmed and made excuses. So let's add "We didn't know there were tortures going on" to these gems:

"We didn't know someone would fly a plane into a building."

"We didn't know the intelligence on WMD was faulty."

"We didn't know there would be an Iraqi insurgency."

Et cetera, ad nauseum.

You know, it doesn't take a genius to realize what BushCo DOES know is how to pass the buck. They're incapable of taking personal responsibility for anything that might take the shine off their halos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Then--where does the buck stop?
Which officers have you been hearing about? When will they be charged? Will they reveal they made up these new methods of interrogation without orders from above? Do you have a link?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. "It has to be extremely unpleasant"?
Says who? And who are these "enemy prisoners"? Were they actively fighting against their lawful oppressors? Or were they merely taken along in a general sweep of a neighborhood? I've certainly seen a lot of first-hand accounts from Iraqi families who have had a chance to talk to reporters about how the soldiers burst into their homes in the middle of the night to grab all the men in a house.

Did Rumsfeld specifically authorize specific torture of specific prisoners? Well, I don't think you could find any orders to that effect. But if a man stands on a loose snow shelf and begins stomping around and tossing lit sticks of dynamite over the edge, is it really so surprising that an avalanche ensues? Is he blameless for the deaths in the valley below the avalanche?

This is the essence of command: Responsibility goes all the way to the top. If you want to pick and choose what you're responsible for, stay out of leadership positions. Rumsfeld and his boss are responsible for everything that has happened in Iraq since March 2003. That's when they elected to take the nation over, and that's when their responsibility began. It can be argued that none of this would have happened had the Bush administration not invaded Iraq. It is irrefutable that all of this happened subsequent to that elective invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. It was in the bowels of the Pentagon (Rummy's territory)
That the secret committee met to figure out ways to "legally" circumscribe those "quaint" Geneva Convention rules by re-defining "torture", and re categorizing prisoners to put them at the mercy of Bush, without any recourse whatsoever.

(Your post is riddled)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Perhaps Jon can get the ball rolling? Someone has to wake
this sleeping giant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I'm with you!
Rise Up America!:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC