Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We won before we lost

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 12:53 PM
Original message
We won before we lost
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 12:55 PM by Jersey Devil
What's so hard to figure out? "I voted for the 87B before I voted against it" is what doomed Kerry. He would have done it all over again even knowing there were no WMD - When he said that I wanted to scream!

What credibility could he have opposing Iraq after that?

On the other hand, those who opposed the war and made no bones about it, either from the start or clearly after Bush invaded had no problem being elected - Obama, Feingold, Boxer. Hell, Boxer got a MILLION more votes in Ca, maybe our bluest state, than Kerry.

We picked a flawed candidate on the Iraq issue. I admire Kerry as an individual and think he put up as good a fight as anyone could under the circumstances but he made mistakes (I would do it again) and never really said what he'd do in Iraq that was different from what Bush is doing. Did he say he'd pull the troops out? No. Did he detail his "plan"? No. So - the plan sounded like a bullshit line and anyone, fundie, right wing, left wing, anyone you pick, could feel free that on Iraq all he offered was "more of the same."

Offered a choice between the more of the same they knew and the more of the same they didn't know, Americans chose the one they knew.

This is all a management problem dumped on us by the DLC which never gave us the chance to choose our nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. He could have made a clearer statement that he voted on two different bill
alot of people think he actually voted for the same bill twice, voting one way and then changing his mind and voting against. He should have emphasized the "white house" changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He had months to explain it and never did it - why?
Why didn't he take the time during the debates for instance to fully explain his vote? It was the most damaging vote Bush had against him yet he barely ever mentioned it and when he did it was just mumbo jumbo that made no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Best one liner of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Your Logic Is Flawed
Kerry won the same states that Obama,Feingold, and Boxer did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. by many less votes
Look it up. Boxer got as million more than kerry in California. The top of the ticket in your party usually gets the most votes. Same for the other states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. I thought Kerry had a consistent position on the war
But man, his rhetoric was all over the map. I could never understand what he was saying about it at any given moment, only that it seemed to be pegged to the national mood. I thought I knew what he meant and could explain it to other people, but hearing it from him made it sound like a senseless jumble.

Why did he never answer the "Wrong war, wrong time" charge? There were great smackdown answers all over the place on that, but it just sat there. The fact that he and Edwards voted against the $87 billion after voting for the war made good sense to me, but it sure wouldn't have if I'd only heard them try to explain it on Meet the Press. Good god.

Oh, and I think his "plan" was to invade Cambodia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC