Why can't Bush regime name real "911hijackers"?

[Voice1]

Following the events of September 2001, as some of you will now doubt know, 7 of the alleged 19 hijackers turned up alive and well elsewhere.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0,1300,555146,00.html
http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen23.xml

Now, what's interesting in light of this is that people don't seem to have asked one important question.

IF the 7 alleged hijackers who've turned up alive and well elsewhere had their ids stolen, then why, well over 4 years after the event has the Bush regime been unable to name the 7 real hijackers, IF indeed there were 19 in total?

Who were the additional 7 people?

Or were there indeed only 12 hijackers?

If there were only 12 hijackers, why did the Bush regime say there were 19 of them?

[reprehensor]

1. The alacrity with which

the "authori-tays" produced the list of hijackers has always bothered me.

It's got "Insert-Patsy-Here" written all over it.

[Ezlivin]

2. I hate to break it to you, but only about 100 people give a damn

The rest of the country seems eager to believe any fantastic tale told them by this administration.

At this point people no longer care about the cause of 9/11. The official story has been told and accepted.

In a few years most of the 9/11 research will have the same patina as JFK assassination research has. And in 20 or so years perhaps someone will uncover the real smoking gun proving government involvement in 9/11. Guess what? It'll mean as much as finding the second shooter in Dallas.

[MrSammo1]

3. At this point people no longer care about the cause of 9/11.

That's not true.

Most people still don't know they've been lied to.