Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pod People, take a look... You may be surprised what is in 'Plane Sight'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
grandg Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 12:39 AM
Original message
Pod People, take a look... You may be surprised what is in 'Plane Sight'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrSammo1 Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm still.....
trying to find a "757" here?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grandg Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. honestly,
i saw pics of american airline's fucilage on the lawn. University of Purdue engineering students did a study, if you can believe them, which kind of makes sense.

Airplanes are relatively flimsy, the pieces of the fucilage will just bounce off and disintegrate upon impact.

However, the mass of the full gas tanks is incredibly powerful. the fuel tanks are incredibly large, and a dense mass of liquid going 500 mph has much more power to penetrate the building than the fucilage would.

Once the nose barely penetrated, the force of the tons of dense liquid in a small, confined area would not stop easily.

This would explain the hole in the wall about the size of a huge gas tank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Pics of fuselage?
Really? Got a Link? Most OCT's here have said it was a piece of the tail.

Fuel tanks. One: They were not full, and two: they are not "incredibly large", they do however fill the mass of the wings. But your supposition that a liquid is more dense than solids (seats, frame, sheet metal, wiring, wheels, electronics, toilet, etc.) is "incredibly large".

Also, the idea that the fuel would concentrate into a circular pattern (forming the round hole) and then change to triangular (the damage done inside the pentagon was triangular.. source: the ASCE report) is an even larger incredible supposition. Seems to me the basic physics of a gas is that expands rapidly, it does not concentrate as your supposition states.

But then the whole theory of a 757 into the pentagon is an incredibly large supposition, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's easy to explain
Edited on Sat Oct-09-04 07:10 AM by LARED
The pod was held in a secret compartment until needed. Installing the pod in the secret compartment needed it to be constructed in flight because it would have been located where the airplanes wheels are located.

So it is very very very very clear that after the jet lifted off a team of highly trained government midgets got into the fuselage -jettisoned the wheel, and then installed the pod, spray nozzles, ray guys, and EMT death ray technology in the secret compartment.

The midget then parachuted to safety over a tree house in a secure location in Bayonne NJ.

Of course the rest of this is well established fact. The pod was energized with microsecond precision in order to create a more hollywoodish effect.


I just don't understand why OCT apologist and dis info agents continue to doubt this. It is quite clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. pod people should also read this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grandg Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. nice link
i had not seen that before, though the peak oil scam is just as bad, if not worse.

how can the pod people still think there was a pod now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC