Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTC Fires.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Ani Yun Wiya Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 12:04 AM
Original message
WTC Fires.
What effect did the rather rapid collapse have on the fires caused by the jets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. According to Shyam Sunder of NIST, the jet fuel burned off in ten
minutes, so it would appear that the rapid collapse had no
effect on the jet fuel fires.

The video of the collapse of the north tower, though, shows
a flare flame from about 10-15 floors below the top in the
NW corner of the building--maybe that is up-to-then-unburned
jet fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ani Yun Wiya Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. So, the jets impacted the structures...
Edited on Fri May-09-08 02:03 AM by Ani Yun Wiya
Then the fuel from the jets ignited and burned for a short period of time.
And during that time other combustible materials were set onfire and burned for a period of time.

What happened to the fires started by the jet fuel fire, when the buildings collapsed ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They burned in the rubble pile for weeks.
there were many tons of combustible material in each tower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
911 Inside Job Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
44. ??
What kind of combustible materials were inside the towers??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. The towers were office buildings.
Go into the nearest office building and list the combustible items in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
46. which have burnt for days not weeks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. One would suppose that the fires were stamped out by the collapsing floors.
All of the four inch concrete floors were completely pulverized--
180,000 tons of concrete. It's hard to imagine the office fires
surviving the dampening effect of the dust.

Also, the fires in WTC2 were going out when the building came down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes it is hard to imagine
But I also imagine what resulted was a restarting of the fire after the collapse when you have a jumblefuck of fuel mixed with still hot embers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The surface temperatures on the pile are 1300 degrees F.
That means the fires below were much much hotter.

How does a reignited jumblefuck generate that kind of temperature?

It can't. That's why NIST denies that the molten metal exists.
Their bullshit is unraveling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. But there is no other mechanism to explain the fires
it couldn't have been thermate - it was consumed before the collapse was even finished.

Again, we get to that all important difference between heat and temperature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It's an all-important difference...
that truthers just don't seem to understand.

Or are willingly oblivious to.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. It's non-truthers that don't understand! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. The molten thermate is insulated in the pile by all the dust and debris. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. There is no such thing as molten thermate
all the thermate is consumed.

Besides, wouldn't all that molten thermate ignite the tons of combustibles in the rubble pile?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Don't expect an answer
Edited on Sat May-10-08 09:40 AM by LARED
This issue has been brought up a few times, and whenever it gets to this stage...... crickets appear.

So either PG really can't understand the issue and will blindly continue on in ignorance, or you're getting jerked around.

I vote for ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. False dichotomy, dishonest framing

Did it ever occur to you that I might be BUSY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. The irony!
Edited on Sun May-11-08 06:17 AM by LARED
There is no dichotomy or dishonest framing except by your response. I implied no time limit on your forth coming non answer to the question. You simply won't or can't answer the question.

As evidenced by you non answer found here http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=204189&mesg_id=204277
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. You guys sink lower and lower. NIST is mired in its own b/s. This summer all comes to a head. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
43. Is this more "Just you wait"?
"This summer......"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. The b/s nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's either molten thermate or molten steel. Whatever.
Dr. Jones seems to be pretty careful to refer to the molten metal
as iron and not steel, so I'm inferring that he thinks it might be
thermate--but what do I know?

Would the thermate ignite combustibles? Who cares? The combustibles
wouldn't burn hot enough to create the surface temperatures of 1300
degrees seen on the piles.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. How was this molten steel produced?
Edited on Sun May-11-08 05:18 AM by hack89
are you saying that the thermate melted huge amounts of steel? Just how big were these pools of metal to produce such large hot spots? How much thermate was required?

As for those surface temps, again there is that all importance difference between heat and temperature that you refuse to address.

Can you show me the results of Jones metallurgy test? They are published aren't they - it's only been 6 years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Can't you read for yourself!?
How is anyone supposed to answer your questions when there's been no investigation to find the answers? :eyes: Why do non-truthers constantly expect us to answer for the criminals that did the deed? It's a stupid argument! Have a real investigation so we'll know exactly the answers to those questions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Basic science perhaps?
truthers make a lot of claims about thermate yet they are unable to prove many of them.

How will a new investigation solve this - aren't you always saying there has to be physical evidence? There is none, so what's the point of an new investigation.

Aren't there any scientist in the truth movement able to do basic experiments on thermate to prove how thermate could have created the hot spots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. okay...
"truthers make a lot of claims about thermate yet they are unable to prove many of them."
what claims aren't proven? many? how many?

"aren't you always saying there has to be physical evidence?" No. But maybe an investigation will uncover as yet unknown evidence.
"There is none, so what's the point of an new investigation." Your assumptions.

"Aren't there any scientist in the truth movement able to do basic experiments on thermate to prove how thermate could have created the hot spots?"
I'm sure they're are. Are there any outside the truth movement doing basic experiments to prove how the steel was molten weeks after the event? Shouldn't we know these answers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. A simple question that has yet to be answered
why use it in the first place? What advantage does it provide over explosives? It has never been used in CD ever - why start now?

The molten metal was most likely aluminum - don't need experiments to show that. With the temperatures seen in the pile and the known melting point of aluminum there had to be tons of it. There is no hard evidence what so ever that steel was ever melted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Why use thermate? Maybe because sniffer dogs won't find it?
Edited on Mon May-12-08 11:28 AM by petgoat
Maybe because, unlike explosive compounds, it's untraceable and can be
manufactured clandestinely without needing the purchase of restricted
precursors?

Maybe because it operates relatively quietly, as opposed to explosives?

Maybe because explosive residue is easier to detect on the steel?

The witnesses describe the molten metal as molten steel.

http://governmentterror.com/#%5B%5BWorld%20Trade%20Center%20Hot%20Spots%5D%5D

Molten aluminum is silvery, not yellow and orange. Molten aluminum would not
produce the 1300 degree surface temperatures on the debris pile.

Lastly, there is plenty of evidence of molten steel in the form of the `
iron-rich microspheres that are ubiquitous in the WTC dust.

Whenever an OTC supporter says "there is no evidence" I know they're
dead wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Microspheres "ubiquitous"? Are you kidding me?
What is Steven Jones' own estimate of the ratio of iron microspheres in the WTC dust, petgoat? Got any idea?

Because I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Ubiquity is not a measure of concentration, bolo

What is the ratio of stellar matter to the vacuum of the universe?
Yet when I look at the night sky the stars are ubiquitous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. So there was no high explosive used at the WTC at all?
because all the reasons to use thermate disappear if they used a combination of thermate and explosives. Interesting - so the pulverized concrete was due to the kinetic energy of the towers?

So you are saying that the molten steel and molten aluminum magically did not mix? How was that possible? And that even though that steel was mixed with ash and crushed concrete, it could still be distinguished from aluminum? How? Do you really think that there were pristine pools of molten anything just laying there?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. How was the molten steel produced? is the operative question; NIST answers by denying it exists nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Once again, produce a single official statement from NIST that denied the existence of molten metal
at Ground Zero.

How you can continue to make that claim when you know it isn't true astonishes me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. You haven't heard John Gross deny it?
Look how he starts gulping water when the question comes up

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7180303712325092501
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I told you, John Gross being an asshole one day (if a technically correct one) isn't
Edited on Mon May-12-08 11:34 AM by boloboffin
an official denial.

That is John Gross, being asked about "molten steel" specifically. NO ONE HAS DIRECT EVIDENCE OF MOLTEN STEEL AT GROUND ZERO. You can see how Gross seizes on that statement.

We have anecdotal evidence of "molten metal." I'm satisfied that some sort of metal was molten under the Pile. And not just molten in the one sense where any red, glowing beam might be called molten (even though it still maintains its shape). That's what a lot of the quotes are talking about, I'll bet.

No, there is eyewitness testimony of metal running liquid under the Pile. I accept it, and if that guy in the video had said molten metal and not molten steel specifically, Gross would have had a harder time denying it.

But Gross being a pissy little bitch about semantics ISN'T an official denial from NIST. In fact, NIST is on record saying that there are reports about molten steel!!

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

13. Why did the NIST investigation not consider reports of molten steel in the wreckage from the WTC towers?

NIST investigators and experts from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEONY)—who inspected the WTC steel at the WTC site and the salvage yards—found no evidence that would support the melting of steel in a jet-fuel ignited fire in the towers prior to collapse. The condition of the steel in the wreckage of the WTC towers (i.e., whether it was in a molten state or not) was irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse since it does not provide any conclusive information on the condition of the steel when the WTC towers were standing.

NIST considered the damage to the steel structure and its fireproofing caused by the aircraft impact and the subsequent fires when the buildings were still standing since that damage was responsible for initiating the collapse of the WTC towers.

Under certain circumstances it is conceivable for some of the steel in the wreckage to have melted after the buildings collapsed. Any molten steel in the wreckage was more likely due to the high temperature resulting from long exposure to combustion within the pile than to short exposure to fires or explosions while the buildings were standing.


That IS the NIST official word on molten steel. Does that sound like a denial of molten steel in the Pile to you, petgoat? The only denial there is the relevance of molten steel in the Pile to conditions before collapse.

Stop stating factual inaccuracies that you KNOW to be factually inaccurate, petgoat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Gross denies the molten steel exists. NIST doesn't talk about it.
OK, how would you phrase it?

In the FAQs, instead of answering the question as to why they didn't discuss
the molten steel in their reports, they said that jet fuel could not have
melted it and it was thus of no interest.

Kind of like the circular reasoning used to justify the failure to investigate
the insider traders--the notion that a lack of connection to al Qaeda meant they
could not be inside trades.

Dr. Astaneh-Asl said he saw melted girders at the WTC.



Here's a set of quotes on molten steel:

http://governmentterror.com/#%5B%5BWorld%20Trade%20Center%20Hot%20Spots%5D%5D



Peter Tully, president of Tully Construction of Flushing, N.Y., told AFP that he saw pools of “literally molten steel” at the World Trade Center.

Joe Allbaugh, the Director of FEMA, was interviewed by Bryant Gumbel of CBS news on October 10 2001:
GUMBEL: We’re seeing a lot of video of smoke pouring up from the debris.
ALLBAUGH: Correct.
GUMBEL: And we’re hearing there are places where temperatures are still approaching and sometimes exceeding a thousand degrees.
ALLBAUGH: That’s right.
GUMBEL: Why? Why do we have these hot spots? What’s going on?
ALLBAUGH: Well, you have normal debris, you know, computers, paper, you have some areas that are hot pockets because of fuel. It’s just too hot for rescuers to get into those areas. So we do not know yet what’s in those areas, other than very hot, molten material. (source_FEMA.gov)
Source publication date: CBS Early Show 10/04/01
Interviewer: Bryant Gumbel
Witness: Joe Allbaugh
MMdate: up to 10/04/01

Leslie Robertson, the structural engineer responsible for World Trade Centers 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and all subgrade levels, stated "As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running." (source_SEAU.org)
Source publication date: SEAU News Volume VI Issue II 10/2001
Interviewer: James M.Williams October 5, 2001 National Council of Structural Engineers Associations 9th Annual Conference.
Witness: Leslie Robertson
MMdate: up to 10/02/01

"I saw melting of girders in World Trade Center." said the first structural engineer given access to the WTC steel. (source) (audio)

"I talked to many contractors and they said they actually saw molten metal trapped, beams had just totally had been melted because of the heat." said Chaplain Herb Trimpe (source) (audio)

A NY firefighter described steel flowing at ground zero. "You'd get down below and you'd see molten steel — molten steel! — running down the channel rails. Like you're in a foundry... like lava... from a volcano. (source) (source) (hi-res_source)

A reporter with rare access to the debris at ground zero "descended deep below street level to areas where underground fires still burned and steel flowed in molten streams." (source) (cached_copy)
Source publication date: July/August 2002 Atlantic Monthly

The owner of Controlled Demolition Inc., Mark Loizeaux stated the molten steel was found “three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed,”. He said molten steel was also found at 7 WTC, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon. (source)

Fires burned and molten steel flowed in the pile of ruins still settling beneath her feet. -Sarah Atlas of New Jersey’s Task Force One Urban Search and Rescue (source_upenn.edu)

"Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is very intense," reports Alison Geyh, PhD. "In some pockets now being uncovered, they are finding molten steel." (source_jhsph.edu)

A veteran of disasters from the Mississippi floods Mt. St. Helens, Burger said it reminded him most of the volcano, if he forgot he was in downtown Manhattan. “Feeling the heat, seeing the molten steel, the layers upon layers of ash, like lava, it reminded me of Mt. St. Helen’s and the thousands who fled that disaster,” he said. Additionally he stated "Shards of steel lay upon shards of steel, shifting and unstable, uncovering red hot metal beams excavated from deep beneath layers of sub-floors, exposing further dark crevasses." (source_neha.org)

"They showed us many fascinating slides" he continued, "ranging from molten metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared and bent in the disaster." -Dr Keith Eaton (source_istructe.org.uk)

A NY Department of Sanitation spokeswoman said "for about two and a half months after the attacks, in addition to its regular duties, NYDS played a major role in debris removal - everything from molten steel beams to human remains...." (source)


He remembers seeing in the darkness a distant, pinkish glow–molten metal dripping from a beam–but found no signs of life. -Lee Turner of The Boone County Firefighters (source)

“In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel,” Fuchek said. (source)

As late as five months after the attacks, in February 2002, firefighter Joe O'Toole saw a steel beam being lifted from deep underground at Ground Zero, which, he says, "was dripping from the molten steel." (source)

...numerous fires were still burning and smoldering. Underground it was still so hot that molten metal dripped down the sides of the wall from Building 6. (source_9-11commission.gov) (2) (3)

Richard Garlock, a structural engineer for LERA said "Going below, it was smoky and really hot... The debris past the columns was red-hot, molten, running." (source)

Vance Deisingnore, OSHA Officer at WTC, reported the following to Jim McKay, Post-Gazette Staff Writer, on September 11, 2002 "a fire truck 10 feet below the ground that was still burning two weeks after the Tower collapsed, its metal so hot that it looked like a vat of molten steel." (source)

Father Edward A. Malloy, on site 40 days after the disaster stated "Firefighters atop a number of ladder trucks were spraying in the areas of greatest smoke. The average temperature beneath the rubble is said to be 1500F so that when steel is brought up it is molten and takes two or three days to cool down." (source_nd.edu)


Guy Lounsbury with the 109th Air Wing of the New York Air National Guard wrote "The men who work on this must constantly change their boots as the heat melts them. Two weeks after the attack, one fireman told us that there was still molten steel at the heart of the towers’ remains." (source)

A group of veteran ironworkers eating lunch while staring at the steel skeleton of a new building going up on West Third Street when one commented on "how much easier it was to eat a sandwich in front of steel that was strong and straight and new, not molten and mangled and laden with debris." (source)

Fire Department Chief Mike Donoho of Texas Task Force 1 Urban Search and Rescue described the scope of the destruction, "Everything had its own look. In the area surrounding what was the two twin towers, there were several buildings still standing that were burned from top to bottom, and some of them were damaged by the collapse. But the two towers — they were 110-story buildings. And there was nothing that you could put your hands on that resembled anything that would tell you this once was two 110-story office buildings. What you had were large columns of steel that were just stuck into massive amounts of molten steel and other metals, that had just fused together from the heat and bonded together from the strength of the collapse. We dug and we dug and we dug, and we cut and we cut and we cut, and we did not see anything that resembled any type of furniture, any type of personal belongings. We found some pieces of things like a telephone, things like that. I think we found credit cards a few times, and we found a couple of stuffed animals. But you would expect to see, like, a bunch of desks, a bunch of chairs. The only way I can explain it is, if you take a car and put it in one of those machines where they crush it and make it look like a cube, and you can’t recognize what it is, that’s what the whole area looked like. It looked like a massive, molten mess that had been fused together, like a car that had been cubed and crushed. With all that heavy, heavy stuff, there were wires, rebar, concrete. Most of it was just steel. A lot of what we were walking on was just molten steel. (source)

Some beams pulled from the wreckage are still red hot more than 7 weeks after the attack, and it is suspected that temperatures beneath the debris pile are well in excess of 1,000°F. (source)

New York mayor Rudy Giuliani said "They were standing on top of a cauldron. They were standing on top of fires 2,000 degrees that raged for a hundred days." (source)

Another danger involved the high temperature of twisted steel pulled from the rubble. Underground fires burned at temperatures up to 2,000 degrees. As the huge cranes pulled steel beams from the pile, safety experts worried about the effects of the extreme heat on the crane rigging and the hazards of contact with the hot steel. And they were concerned that applying water to cool the steel could cause a steam explosion that would propel nearby objects with deadly force. Special expertise was needed. OSHA called in structural engineers from its national office to assess the situation. They recommended a special handling procedure, including the use of specialized rigging and instruments to reduce the hazards. (source_OSHA.gov)

The temperature at the core of "the pile," is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials (source)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. NIST DOES talk about it, I gave you the freaking quote.
PLEASE stop pissing on my leg and telling me it's raining.

Unless any of those quotes have scientific tests properly conducted to establish that the molten material was indeed steel, you've got nothing but anecdotal evidence. Produce the tests. Don't have any? Then you don't have any scientifically verifiable evidence of molten steel, and you STILL don't have any relevance to conditions before the collapse. There was no reason for NIST to consider conditions well after the collapse.

Jesus, it's like you don't even read what I write. I ACCEPT MOLTEN STEEL AT THE PILE, PETGOAT. So does NIST, implicitly, by speaking about these reports and not denying them. There just is no relevance to how the towers fell. NONE.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. "just is no relevance " That's what I mean in saying they don't talk about it.
They talk about the molten steel, to which numerous witnesses testified,
only to declare it irrelevant. THEY WON'T DISCUSS IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. BUT THAT'S NOT DENYING IT. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. You say above that they talk about it. They don't. Gross denies it, they don't talk about it nt
Edited on Mon May-12-08 03:55 PM by petgoat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. "No other mechanism" makes no sense. The thermite is not consumed.
End products are aluminum oxide and elemental iron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. OK, so tell me
how much molten metal was in the rubble pile and how much thermate was required to produce. Judging from the size of the hot spot, we are taking about an area larger then a football field - that's a lot of elemental iron, wouldn't you say? And what is the ratio of thermate to by-product? Looks like you are talking about a huge amount of thermate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
47. there is only one explanation
and I don't think it has been used in high rise buildings before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. When did NIST deny that the molten metal exists?
Edited on Fri May-09-08 06:27 PM by boloboffin
Produce an official quote.

John Gross being a pissy little bitch isn't NIST saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. John Gross is NIST. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. No, he is not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Whatever you say. Porcine Pilots Proliferate in your dreams. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC