Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Patsies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:06 AM
Original message
Patsies
Some suggest the alleged hijackers were patsies. Such a notion implies that they had no criminal intent. Why should we believe this? I would agree that their capability to plan such an attack without detection and pull it off is hard to believe. However, I don't have much difficulty questioning likely motives...ie...anger about US foreign policy in the Middle East or radical religious beliefs.

Is patsy the right description if they had criminal intent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tetedur Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another interesting question: Patsies for whom?
If they worked for UBL, and he laughed at them (as in the "fat Osama tape")for not even knowing what they were being sent to do until the last minute, are they not his patsies?

Did they think Allah would be pleased with the death and destruction of 9/11 that enabled George w. Bush to invade and kill innocents in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's confusing
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 03:35 PM by noise
Tarpley refers to the movie The Package as an example of how false flag operations work. BTW, I refer to Tarpley because many people in the 9/11 truth movement seem to be advocates of his 'synthetic terror' paradigm. In the movie the patsy thinks he is doing something patriotic. He has no idea that he is being setup. There was no criminal intent on his part.

Can the same be said of the al Qaeda operatives? LIHOP theories suggest that the al Qaeda operatives pulled off the attacks though they should have been stopped if government officials had followed standard procedure. Meaning LIHOP=no patsies. Even in MIHOP scenarios it is still possible that the al Qaeda operatives were involved in hijacking airplanes. For example, the possible use of drones doesn't mean the passenger planes were not hijacked.

Some of the al Qaeda operatives were well educated so if they were patsies it becomes necessary to explain how they were duped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tetedur Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If the "magnificent" 19 are the men the oct says they are,
they worked for UBL and believed they were entirely and religiously justified in their attacks. It's hard for me to believe that these guys were religiously motivated. Why all the trips to strip joints, bars and casinos etc.? A devoted person wouldn't leave their Koran at bar unless they are leaving a bread crumb trail.

Were they hit men in UBL's mafia or is it an international cartel? Daniel Hopsicker's investigation into the goings on in Venice certainly make it sound that way. Did they think they had immunity or protection?

Though some were educated, were they duped and manipulated? Did they think they were secret agents working for a government entity like ISI?

Some members of al-Qaeda are not the sharpest knives in the drawer, i.e. Reid and Moussaoui. Some are murderous psychos.

I will check out "The Package" but I always think of Lee Harvey Oswald, the most famous self-proclaimed patsy of them all, when someone says that word "patsy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Try these...
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 09:03 PM by SDuderstadt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Try the FBI report (the unredacted parts)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tetedur Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You must be referring to the $618.61 spent on pornography and sex toys
in July according to the Sun Trust Bank account activity. That is of course if you can trust the FBI....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The party stories don't seem the least implausible to me...
They're very interesting stories, but they wouldn't automatically disprove the official story. I see nothing unusual about men who profess strict Islamist or other fundamentalist faith (or even a willingness to die for a cause) and who simultaneously live a life of drunken parties and visits to hookers - in this country, we refer to the same combination as The Republican Way. The Abramoff casino boat visit is certainly interesting, though. And the fact that the 9/11 Commission ignored all the partying is also interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane_nyc Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Thanks, Jack.
Edited on Mon Jul-07-08 04:38 PM by Diane_nyc
Thanks for calling our attention to the page http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/news.jsp?oid=140393703-423">2/14/2008: Newly Released FBI Timeline Reveals New Information about 9/11 Hijackers that Was Ignored by 9/11 Commission on the Cooperative Research site.

ETA: I just now found a thread about this here on DU: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=194923&mesg_id=194923">Important new information about the 9/11 hijackers, posted by Paul Thompson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Far more people saw the 19 partying hard at strip clubs and casinos
than saw a plane hit the Pentagon.

Why do you dismiss all these reports? What incentive would all these eyewitnesses have to lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Can you think of a plausible "duped and manipulated" scenario?
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 02:10 AM by noise
I have difficulty understanding how they could fail to be suspicious of being setup. One scenario that might explain it is the prospect of a standard hijacking. The problem is that such a MO doesn't really fit the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Wasn't OBL referring to the secret government in his first interview (Ummat)? n/t
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 08:49 PM by CGowen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. intent
yes - if hired then they would have intent ie. they wanted to be paid handsomely for it. I think there was money being tranferred to them. If they were involved in the crime then they would be criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. What were they so angry about? Was the CIA not paying them enough
for their blow, gambling and stripper habits or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think they may have
had some political motivation but more to the point - they were impressionable young men.

Many young men like the idea of being a "secret agent", of being trained to fight and fire weapons and have a diplomatic immunity to travel around at will.

And the idea of living it up and going out in a blaze of glory is no different to many adolescent fantasies. Look at the homicide-suicide shooter phenomenon.

The so-called "muscle" probably didn't know the full extent of the plan but the pilots may have done and may have liked the idea of going down in history and changing the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MinM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Jerry Lewis as "The Patsy" (1964)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC