Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If anyone here still doubts the 9/11 Commission was a whitewash...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 12:14 AM
Original message
If anyone here still doubts the 9/11 Commission was a whitewash...
Hopefully this will lay that notion to rest. From today's Washington Post, Cofer Black, head of the CIA's counterterrorism unit is quoted:

The July 10 meeting of Rice, Tenet and Black went unmentioned in various investigations into the Sept. 11 attacks, and Woodward wrote that Black "felt there were things the commissions wanted to know about and things they didn't want to know about."

Jamie S. Gorelick, a member of the Sept. 11 commission, said she checked with commission staff members who told her investigators were never told about a July 10 meeting. "We didn't know about the meeting itself," she said. "I can assure you it would have been in our report if we had known to ask about it."

White House and State Department officials yesterday confirmed that the July 10 meeting took place, although they took issue with Woodward's portrayal of its results.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/29/AR2006092901593_2.html

He says commissions. The 9/11 Congressional Inquiry was only marginally better, in my opinion (at least they covered the Saudi angle some). I'm sure that as time goes on, more and more overlooked instances like this will come out. And the REALLY damning stuff will probably take the longest to see the light of day, if it ever does. As one of the Jersey Girls says in the 9/11: Press for Truth movie, "the 9/11 Commission was the ultimate don't ask, don't tell."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Was there ever a doubt?
From the day they tried to put Henry Kissinger in charge and installed their gatekeeper Philip D. Zelikow has the Executive Director, it was apparent that this was going to be another Warren Commission.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. When we take back the government from the Republican Syndicate,
we really, really need to revisit the root details of why the 9/11 attacks were successful. We've learned an incredible amount of new details and the more you evaluate the results of the 9/11 Commission Report, the more you realize that the purpose was to filter and limit the scope of questions and avoid anyone from having accountability for their actions on that day.

No justice served for the 3,000 who died that day....and the same cast of characters are still in a position to benefit from another "terrorist attack".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenseconds Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. by the way...
Hi,OAITW.Have you heard the first responders' speeches in Community Church,NYC, on 9-9-06?

It was broadcast on http://kpfa.org/archives/index.php?arch=16240
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klimmer Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Spot on Paul.
I sure appreciate all your hard work in the 9/11 truth movement.

Your DVD with the Jersey girls is awesome. I really appreciate all that research and this current DVD project.

Hope, you get on Randi Rhodes again soon. Keep up the great work. I do think more and more people are waking up. The evidence is over whelming.

Perhaps that is why the Bush admin. is over turning over laws in the anticipation of hauling us all in.

Personally, if I have the choice I would like to be sent to Manzanar. I like looking at the Sierras and dreaming of climbs and ski descents. Hey, I call dibs on the top bunk!

(I hope everyone realizes that last statement is drenched with humor and sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medienanalyse Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. The same Bob Woodward told the public
what Bush registered in his diary on 9/11 - that it was the Pearl harbor of the 21st century. And "an interesting day".

The Pearl harbor of the 21st century was exactly what the PNAC guys were longing for - see the remark in the article "Rebuilding Americas Defenses" to transform the military into what it is now.

So when Tenet met with the others in the White House

("The book also reports that then-CIA Director George J. Tenet and his counterterrorism chief, J. Cofer Black, grew so concerned in the summer of 2001 about a possible al-Qaeda attack that they drove straight to the White House to get high-level attention.")

he uttered (allegedly) his "concerns" in front of those who were longing for the event.

I guess it was a funny meeting.

The 9/11 ommission is completely uninteresting: I do not know ONE fact that was investigated by that crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. It was "a failure of imagination" only if
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 10:31 PM by Hissyspit
you accept the premise that the Bush administration didn't want an attack to occur.

Because the commission didn't entertain that premise, they had the "failure of imagination."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Every one I've looked at had a conflict of interest
on the 911 "Omission", which means they had a motive to not find out too much. They needed to protect their corporate clients and colleagues, etc.. I don't think it is just that they were not "given" the information Also, every interesting person I read about that was there , always says they tried to contact them, but they weren't interested. It makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. asscroft warned not to fly commercial jets..
July 21 2001..john asscroft warned not to fly commercial jets
so he used private chartered jets at the cost of 1600.00 dollars an hour. This is 11 days after the supposed
tenet-rice meeting. but there is more..
When Tenet testified in public at the 911 hearings he was asked this question,"did you meet with the chimp during the month of August?" tenet replies,"NO" chimp was in crawford and I was in Maryland. So I accept that
however later in the afternoon on that same day both tenet and kean appeared on camera to amend tenet's sworn
testimony to include meeting the chimp on August 18 2001 2 days after Moussouari was arrested, and August 25 2001 tenet spent the day at the ranch in Crawford with rice, and some war hawk generals, also on August 31 2001 when chimpy came back from vacation just in time to have the Labor Day weekend off. My question is,"what did they discuss at those 3 subsequent meetings" Osama, Enron, h'm.. I'd like to know because if they failed to discuss the Phoenix Flight Memo, Asscrofts threat assessment, the Aug.6 01' PDB (alright you covered your ass memo) then their guilty of gross dereliction of duty

2001 the summer of threat, the system was blinking red..


Paul, still doubt that the 8/6/01 PDB said, "weeks many many dead, very very big uproar, possibly using hijacked commercial jets as suicide weapons to be crashed into skyscrapers in New York City, Chicago and
Washington DC.?" and this, "who could have imagined terrorists would fly commercial jets into buildings"

They knew...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kicking!
Thank you Paul T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
planeman Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes.I hope the fact the saudi Goverment is comlplicit in 9-11 is advanced.
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 01:04 PM by planeman
Pakistans involvement too should be accentuated.And it should put to rest all these other outrageouse theories that Isreal is involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The only way to dispose of the possibility of Israeli involvement
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 03:37 PM by petgoat
is to investigate it honestly.

Israeli foreknowledge is not necessarily evidence of participation.
Maybe diligent Israeli investigators simply doing their jobs of
fighting international terrorism paid attention to the warnings
the Bush administration ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Why couldn't elements from both Pakistan and Israel be involved?
(besides several others)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. well they could be. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. thank you Paul!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. yes ...
thank you Paul!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. I sure appreciate all your hard work in the 9/11 truth movement.
911 was an inside job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. Thanks Paul
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 02:40 AM by leftstreet
Thanks for all your hard work.

I first found your timeline through the 9/11 Press For Truth cd, featuring "The Jersey Girls."

:hi:

on edit: I just realized this is an older DU thread. I don't know if Paul still posts here, but kudos all the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. kick!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. lest we forget.........
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. A "whitewash" is, by defintion, not full of holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. How can they whitewash it if they were never told about it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. It was a whitewash
And it is full of holes. And the members of the Omission knew the questions that needed to be answered for it to become not the Omission, but they refused to find the answers. The Widows had several questions that were completely ignored!

Well, finally Bushco has been evicted from squatting our White House and as we get to the point where Bushco is charged with their crimes, maybe some brave soul in the investigation will open up this Bushco nightmare and we get to the bottom of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
25.  I will go on record that the 9-11 commision was whitewash
designed to spell out in the most inocuous terms to the administraion what happened on 9-11.

That does not mean it was an inside job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC