Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Livni: Palestinian statehood isn't a favor to Obama, it's vital for Israel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 10:04 PM
Original message
Livni: Palestinian statehood isn't a favor to Obama, it's vital for Israel
Opposition leader Tzipi Livni said Monday that Israel must adopt the vision of a two-state solution, telling an AIPAC conference that it was the only way to preserve its status as the Jewish homeland.

"Inaction is not an option" to the stalled peace process, Livni told the conference a day after Obama delivered his own address to the pro-Israel lobby clarifying his vision for a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders with land swaps, which was immediately rejected by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his coalition allies.

Taking a much more official tone than she usually reserves for her Jewish audiences abroad, Livni said that she had decided to come before to the conference "not to ask what the U.S. can do for Israel, but what we can do together to confront the challenges."

If Israel did not take a step to lead the peace process, it would inevitably be led, she said. Israel should welcome the sentiment of hope accompanying the changes that have swept the Middle East, Livni said, but warned that as Zionists "we can't only hope, we can't remain indifferent to this battle that will shape our future".

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/livni-palestinian-statehood-isn-t-a-favor-to-obama-it-s-vital-for-israel-1.363596
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JonScholar Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. When did Livni ever offer the Palestinians a settlement in compliance with the Geneva Accords?
Talk is cheap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What makes you think the PA would accept the Geneva Accords?
Olmert's offer (with Livni's help) in 2008 came close enough for the Geneva Accord people to proudly endorse it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Livni (Olmert) offer similar to Geneva Accord
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Times have changed
Obama is the president now, not Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Livni is making a lot of sense right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Makes me very sad
To think of where we might be right now if she was PM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. What do you think the difference would be?
Edited on Tue May-24-11 11:01 AM by shira
I'm not sure all that much would be significantly different.

Better yes for sure with no Lieberman or Netanyahu - but a Livni gov't would be pilloried as Olmert's was for Cast Lead, etc. Israel would still be described as run by a rightwing coalition.

Abbas rejected Olmert/Livni's best offer so I'm not sure what they'd negotiate with Obama.

Your take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think there'd be a much better chance for a breakthrough
I think between Obama's active engagement in the process and Livni's eagerness to make a two-state solution a reality, there would have been a deal made with Abbas/Fayyad before September.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC