Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

View From a Palestinian Leader: Palestine's Guernica and the Myths of Israeli Victimhood

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:21 PM
Original message
View From a Palestinian Leader: Palestine's Guernica and the Myths of Israeli Victimhood
Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Monday, Dec 29 2008, 10:52AM

This is a guest post written by Mustafa Barghouthi, Secretary General of the Palestinian National Initiative. These comments and views are his own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Washington Note or Huffington Post. Barghouti is a former secular candidate for President of Palestine and has been a strong advocate of non-violent responses to Israeli occupation. Barghouti is thought by many to be a leading contender in the next Palestinian presidential election. The Washington Note has also solicited perspectives from various national leaders and incumbent Knesset leaders in Israel.

Here is a link to an interview that Steve Clemons did with Barghouti in July 2008 regarding Barack Obama's trip to Israel and Palestine.

Palestine's Guernica and the Myths of Israeli Victimhood

The Israeli campaign of 'death from above' began around 11 am, on Saturday morning, the 27th of December, and stretched straight through the night into this morning. The massacre continues Sunday as I write these words.

The bloodiest single day in Palestine since the War of 1967 is far from over following on Israel's promised that this is 'only the beginning' of their campaign of state terror. At least 290 people have been murdered thus far, but the body count continues to rise at a dramatic pace as more mutilated bodies are pulled from the rubble, previous victims succumb to their wounds and new casualties are created by the minute.

What has and is occurring is nothing short of a war crime, yet the Israeli public relations machine is in full-swing, churning out lies by the minute.

Once and for all it is time to expose the myths that they have created.

1. Israelis have claimed to have ended the occupation of the Gaza Strip in 2005.

While Israel has indeed removed the settlements from the tiny coastal Strip, they have in no way ended the occupation. They remained in control of the borders, the airspace and the waterways of Gaza, and have carried out frequent raids and targeted assassinations since the disengagement.

Furthermore, since 2006 Israel has imposed a comprehensive siege on the Strip. For over two years, Gazans have lived on the edge of starvation and without the most basic necessities of human life, such as cooking or heating oil and basic medications. This siege has already caused a humanitarian catastrophe which has only been exacerbated by the dramatic increase in Israeli military aggression.

2. Israel claims that Hamas violated the cease-fire and pulled out of it unilaterally.


Hamas indeed respected their side of the ceasefire, except on those occasions early on when Israel carried out major offensives in the West Bank. In the last two months, the ceasefire broke down with Israelis killing several Palestinians and resulting in the response of Hamas. In other words, Hamas has not carried out an unprovoked attack throughout the period of the cease-fire.

Israel, however, did not live up to any of its obligations of ending the siege and allowing vital humanitarian aid to resume in Gaza. Rather than the average of 450 trucks per day being allowed across the border, on the best days, only eighty have been allowed in - with the border remaining hermetically sealed 70% of the time. Throughout the supposed 'cease-fire' Gazans have been forced to live like animals, with a total of 262 dying due to the inaccessibility of proper medical care.

Now after hundreds dead and counting, it is Israel who refuses to re-enter talks over a cease-fire. They are not intent on securing peace as they claim; it is more and more clear that they are seeking regime change - whatever the cost.

3. Israel claims to be pursuing peace with 'peaceful Palestinians'.

Before the on-going massacre in the Gaza Strip, and throughout the entirety of the Annapolis Peace Process, Israel has continued and even intensified its occupation of the West Bank. In 2008, settlement expansion increased by a factor of 38, a further 4,950 Palestinians were arrested - mostly from the West Bank, and checkpoints rose from 521 to 699.

Furthermore, since the onset of the peace talks, Israel has killed 546 Palestinians, among them 76 children. These gruesome statistics are set to rise dramatically now, but previous Israeli transgressions should not be forgotten amidst this most recent horror.

Only this morning, Israel shot and killed a young peaceful protester in the West Bank village of Nihlin, and has injured dozens more over the last few hours. It is certain that they will continue to employ deadly force at non-violent demonstrations and we expect a sizable body count in the West Bank as a result. If Israel is in fact pursuing peace with 'good Palestinians', who are they talking about?

4. Israel is acting in self-defense.

It is difficult to claim self defense in a confrontation which they themselves have sparked, but they are doing it anyway. Self-defense is reactionary, while the actions of Israel over the last two days have been clearly premeditated. Not only did the Israeli press widely report the ongoing public relations campaign being undertaken by Israel to prepare Israeli and international public opinion for the attack, but Israel has also reportedly tried to convince the Palestinians that an attack was not coming by briefly opening crossings and reporting future meetings on the topic. They did so to insure that casualties would be maximized and that the citizens of Gaza would be unprepared for their impending slaughter.

It is also misleading to claim self-defense in a conflict with such an overwhelming asymmetry of power. Israel is the largest military force in the region, and the fifth largest in the world. Furthermore, they are the fourth largest exporter of arms and have a military industrial complex rivaling that of the United States. In other words, Israel has always had a comprehensive monopoly over the use of force, and much like its super power ally, Israel uses war as an advertising showcase of its many instruments of death.

5. Israel claims to have struck military targets only.

Even while image after image of dead and mutilated women and children flash across our televisions, Israel brazenly claims that their munitions expertly struck only military installations. We know this to be false as many other civilian sites have been hit by airstrikes including a hospital and mosque.

In the most densely populated area on the planet, tons upon tons of explosives have been dropped. The first estimates of injured are in the thousands. Israel will claim that these are merely 'collateral damage' or accidental deaths. The sheer ridiculousness and inhumanity of such a claim should sicken the world community.


please, please read on... (Scroll down on the page... the top part looks blank)
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2008/12/view_from_a_pal/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Important POV from leading Palestinian secular, progressive activist.
Edited on Mon Dec-29-08 08:35 PM by ProgressiveMuslim
This is a challenge to American progressives -- I think this guy is a good as it gets in terms of telling the truth, presenting a nonviolent solution, and still having credibility among the people in Palestine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stranger81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for posting this.
Interesting prefatory disclaimer that strikes me as odd for Huffington Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. God forbid someone assume one agrees with a Palestinian, no matter
how progressive or secular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. The comments about Hamas respected the cease fire are not accurate
June 25: Hamas: We will not police cease-fire with Israel

The comments by Hamas leader Khalil al-Haya came shortly after Gaza militants fired three rockets into southern Israel Tuesday, lightly wounding two Israelis. It was the first attack since the truce took effect last Thursday.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25363135/

Hamas repeatedly violated the so-called ceasefire and also launched scores of missiles immediately after it was up - in one instance killing two Palestinian children in the process.

This entire article minimizes or omits the many belligerent actions of Hamas and absolves them of any responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Why would a secular progressive minimize the beligerant actions of a theocratic religious
Edited on Mon Dec-29-08 09:49 PM by ProgressiveMuslim
movement?

Oberliner, do you in all honesty, believe these bombardments are purely defensive on teh part of Israel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Because he is furious at Israel and the way they are justifying this attack?
I certainly can understand why he would want to emphasize elements that he feels are not getting enough attention and de-emphasize those that he feels are getting too much attention.

I'm not sure what you mean by "purely defensive" however I would argue that if Hamas had engaged in no attacks against Israel then this attack on Gaza would not be taking place now.

Would you agree with that?

I think that there are actions Hamas could have taken to prevent anything like this from ever happening. I also think there were actions that Hamas could have taken which would have resulted in the end of the Gaza blockade.

I say that not to justify the attack by Israel but to ask that people at least acknowledge some truths about Hamas that are sometimes ignored (just like some truths about Israel are sometimes ignored on the other side of this debate).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. What do you suppose motivates the rocket attacks?
Do you at least recognize that they don't come out of an anti-semitic vacuum, but are a response to the ongoing subjugation of the people of Palestine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. What do you suppose motivates the current Israeli attack?
Do you agree with those here who say it is simply bloodlust and that the Israelis want to kill as many Palestinians as possible because they hate Arabs?

I think that both the construct of your question and this one are dangerously false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. My bigger question for you is: apart from your disagreement with one of his points
what do you think of the overall analysis. Is that a POV that you believe Israel can and should work with/respond to?

Do you think the rest of what he is saying is true?

I'm asking because I believe this POV is the BEST that will ever come out of Palestine. And if this POV is still not "a partner for peace" then I fear that indeed there will never be peace.

Truthfully, after this week, I don't believe there will ever be peace. I fear it's going to come down to the last man standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Unfortunately, I share your pessimism
The prospects for a peaceful resolution of this conflict appear to be quite low.

I think Barghouthi makes some valid points but omits critical information.

He also uses hyperbolic language that is less than helpful.

Were he to be elected to a position of power, I would think that he is someone the Israelis could work with.

However, things look very grim right now for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I agree. I think the end-game will ultimately include
the ethnic cleansing of Israel proper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vegasaurus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. How might that happen? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The article was truly disappointing
Instead of pointing out the failures of Hamas which lead to the air strikes, and how a progressive approach would have been better for all concerned, it supports the Hamas position, something a truly secular progressive could never do IMO. Haven't we gotten beyond the enemy of my enemy is my friend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think the fact that his view differs from yours should give you pause to rethink what he's saying.
He's there. Maybe you have it wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Sir your post is disingenuous
But as a reminder

Report: Hamas arrests merchants planning to thwart truce

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=124&topic_id=216733
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Thank you for sharing that
There was some real hope at one point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. That situation continued until November 4
until that date it was accepted that Hamas was at least trying and then almost as if by "magic" it changed and new talking point for the proIsrael set and one* in particular, became it did not matter anymore that Hama was trying if any rovket was fired from Gaza it was te fault of Hamas.


* I have found this one poster a fair barometer of what is going to happen and this posters "precleaning" for Saturdays carnage in Gaza started more than a week prior to the raid with the theme being "death benefits them(Hamas or Palestinians)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am just sorry that the Israeli's have been given a green light with
a wink and a nod by Bush to dump tons of explosives on a strip of land twenty five miles long and seven and a half miles wide at it widest. Think about that and then add one and a half milliion people into the picture. Hamas couldn't do this much if it tried.

I have a related question. Why is it NOW that the Israeli government has finally had enough rockets? Was this a problem two months ago? I think their "protest" is of a more political timing than anything like their patience: Bush is on vacation, of course, the AMerical people are between administrations and there's a pending election in Israel. Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. An excellent article
Point 7 is spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thank you
i would recommend if I could
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudsT Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. thanks for sharing ProgressiveMuslim
:toast:

StudsT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks for the post
Edited on Mon Dec-29-08 10:53 PM by AnOhioan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
22. Why isnt this guy in charge?!
If there will ever be any chance of peace - leaders like this are definitely needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC