Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The attack on Jimmy Carter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 05:21 PM
Original message
The attack on Jimmy Carter

Bill Fletcher, Jr., The Electronic Intifada, 4 May 2008

Former US President James (Jimmy) Carter has the ability to appear almost out of thin air, landing in the midst of some of the most complex international crises. He has done it again, this time in going to meet with the Palestinian resistance group, Hamas. For reaching out to this significant section of the Palestinian movement, he is being demonized by both the Bush administration and the administration of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

Former President Carter has crossed a line that George W. Bush and his Israeli allies have set, aimed at isolating and destroying Hamas. Despite the fact that Hamas won internationally-recognized elections in Palestine in 2006, Bush and the Israelis have been doing all they can to void the elections, isolate Hamas and destroy them. In fact, a blockbuster article in Vanity Fair revealed details of a plan hatched by the Bush administration along with an anti-Hamas Palestinian leader to carry out a coup against Hamas. The plot failed, leading to a Hamas preemptive strike against the forces of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, with the result being a Hamas takeover of the Gaza Strip.

Carter concluded, and this is entirely consistent with his best-selling book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, that all significant forces involved in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must be brought to the table if there is to be a permanent and just settlement of outstanding matters. Bush and Olmert have a very different vision. Their objective is to turn the Abbas government into a puppet regime that operates akin to a subcontractor, in this case a subcontractor to manage the Palestinian people. Carter, on the other hand, recognizes that such an approach is not only undesirable -- even from the standpoint of the ruling circles in the US -- but is also untenable. For this reason, he has insisted on meeting with Hamas as well as the Syrian government.

The preliminary results of these meetings are very intriguing. Hamas has offered to accept Israel -- though not recognize it -- as long as Israel withdraws to the pre-June 1967 borders. Specifically, they would call for a 10 year truce. What Hamas is offering, in fact, is a de facto recognition of Israel as long as this is the will of the Palestinian people. This last point is of particular importance, however. Hamas is stating that they will not accept any deal imposed upon the Palestinian people, either by an external power or through undemocratic means internal to the Palestinian people. They are, additionally, calling for the democratic participation of the Palestinian Diaspora in decisions regarding the future of the Palestinian people. Some commentators have claimed that this is unrealistic, but it is no more unrealistic than the Iraqi elections that included the Iraqi Diaspora.

The attacks on Carter are not only aimed at undermining any good will that he has secured with Hamas and the Syrians, but also at blocking efforts at any route to peace not dictated by Bush and the Israeli government. As became clear in the aftermath of the Palestinian elections and the Hamas victory, elections and self-determination are perfectly acceptable for Bush and the Israeli government as long as the results are those that Bush and the Israelis have approved.

read on...
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article9507.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. yep, that obama really dissed Jimmy Carter for trying to bring peace to the mideast nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just wondering if GWB has even been discussed in the Nobel committee
Looks like Jimmy is going for his second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notfullofit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It would not suprise me.
seems they will hand it out to anybody these days.
I believe they've lost quite a bit of crediblity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. How about Al Gore?
Did that one "lose credibility" for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notfullofit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Actually
I was referring to the GWB reference in the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Judging from your other posts
I was not sure, sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vegasaurus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. What, anyone who supports Israel is a right wing freeper? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No but Jimmy Carter
is not popular with that particular group of self proclaimed Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hopefully he will win n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Electronic Intifada? A bunch of regular peaceniKKKs, aren't they?
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vegasaurus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. A responsible, democratically elected government
looks after the welfare of its citizens.

Hamas has shown itself incapable of even the most basic forms of governance.

Armed thugs rule the streets.

They bomb their own food and fuel supply, endangering the health and welfare of their citizens.

They put annihilating Israel above the needs of their citizens.

This is no government of democracy.

They should be isolated, without question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC