Maybe you really didn't get it.
The person you quoted when you reproduced this:
"More than 30 Democrats joined their Republican colleagues in the House to override the governor's narrow-minded veto"
from here:
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=172-09102003was one of the people my post was about: Joe Waldron:
"Missouri has an opportunity to join 35 other progressive states that have liberalized right-to-carry statutes," added CCRKBA Executive Director Joe Waldron. "History has proven that these laws do not result in the kind of Wild West shoot-outs that have been repeatedly predicted by anti-self-defense extremists. More than 30 Democrats joined their Republican colleagues in the House to override the governor's narrow-minded veto. Senate Democrats should follow their example."
The other one, Gottlieb, was also quoted extensively. In fact, they were the only two quoted.
And why's that? Why, because the source is a
press release, not a "report".
Just goes to show that even a stopped clock is right twice a day and all that. The objectionable nature of your source and its objectionable characterization of the facts for which you cite it didn't affect my assessment of the credibility of the facts in this case: I"m quite sure that it's in all likelihood true that "More than 30 Democrats joined their Republican colleagues in the House to override the governor's narrow-minded veto" -- although I'm sure there must be some source that would give a precise figure, and I do wonder why anyone would make this particular source his/her first choice ...
.