Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Assault Weapon Lies from the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 10:35 AM
Original message
More Assault Weapon Lies from the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence
Edited on Sat May-08-04 10:39 AM by slackmaster
From an article posted yesterday, Dems Push for Assault Rifle Ban:

"The semiautomatic weapons continue firing ammunition automatically once the user squeezes the trigger once and keeps it pressed down."

Utterly and completely untrue. Can anyone still deny that the anti-gun propagandists are promoting a myth that expiration of the federal "assault weapons" ban will make machineguns easier to obtain?

Anyone at all?

Hello?

Does this kind of hysterical nonsense help or hurt Democrats in general? I think it hurts us badly.

See http://www.csgv.org/news/headlines/cincipost5_7_04.cfm if you can stomach the lies. I couldn't read past the sentence quoted above because I was laughing too hard.

And here's another one promiting the "spray gunfire into a crowd" myth:

http://www.csgv.org/news/headlines/ap5_7_04.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Complete and utter bs....
don't they understand what "semi-auto" means...? :eyes:
Oh well, just continues to give us liberals a bad name...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not much in the article to work with.
The semiautomatic weapons continue firing ammunition automatically once the user squeezes the trigger once and keeps it pressed down.

Outright lie. Plain and simple.

Urban areas already are wracked by gun violence, and ending the ban would worsen the situation, the lawmakers said.

So are they saying that ten years of the AWB hasn't had an appreciable effect? Shouldn't gun violence be uncommon by now?

"These guns can't be used for hunting or any purpose like that," said Rocky Merz, a Crowley aide. "They're made for one reason and one reason only, and that's to use against people."

.223 Remington was developed as a hunting caliber. It is used widely and effectively for small-sized game. This is the ammunition used by the AR-15. 7.62x39 ammo is an excellent deer caliber, and this is what the AK-47 fires.

"It comes down to articulating the message about what the bill does. I am always an optimist. Even if the decks are stacked against me, I have to assume it will pass."

Funny how that message isn't articulated in the article. What does this bill do that isn't already done by the AWB?

Not much substance to the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Having a gangster for your avatar says it all
Guns don't make peoples lives better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Opinions judged by avatars.
What in-depth, critical analysis of the issue you've demonstrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natasha1 Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Perhaps so...
Guns don't make peoples lives better.

This could be arguably true.

But the fact is, there are people in the world who would use force against you to make you do things against your will.

If you can use guns to stop those kinds of people, then I would say guns can make people's lives better.

Nat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's an endless stupid arms race
your sacred gun won't stop my tank and my tank won't stop the next guys helicopter gunship. The gangster avatar is inappropriate for this site but certainly appropriate for a gun worshipper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot Donating Member (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The way I see it...
Prohibition has NEVER worked, for anything. Guns will be no different. If you want one bad enough, you will be able to get one, regardless of what the laws state. The same as it is with drugs now and alcohol during Prohibition.

I also see personal security, ultimately, as an individual responsibility. By all means call 911, but keep in mind they may not get there in time, I truly hope they do but this is not the world we live in. If they are late, they may only be able to draw chalk outlines around you and your loved ones. You are the one responsible for your safety.

There are bad people out there who would do you and yours serious harm. Chances are you'll not run into one, but there is a chance you will. Me? I'll protect my family should chance not favor us. I'll use my firearms if necessary to do it. I don't dwell on it, I don't live in fear of being attacked, but I am ready to defend myself and my family.

Don't like using guns for protection? Then don't.

BTW, my gun doesn't have to be bigger than my opponent's, I just have to be better than my opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I don't like guns used for crime or intimidation
Most gun crime in this nation is against family members, neighbors and fellow workers. Where was the promicuous gun law crowd when the election was stolen? Oh, I forgot, getting ready to move into the Whiet House with the most facist Predident in American histoy. So much for the promiscuous gun law crowds respect for democracy.

As far as scum, it's hard to beat the NRA and GOA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I on the other hand...
...must by implication be in favor of guns used for crime and intimidation. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Why are all gun owners lumped with the NRA?
Yes, we acknowledge that their political motives are scummy. But perhaps it's possible that we are not aligned with their tactics.

But judging by your Benchleyesque ad hominems, I doubt you're too willing to actually discuss the issue. You'd rather call us all Bushite traitors.

Perhaps if the Democrats would stop alienating gun owning members of their own party, they'd get more solidarity on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Gunners had your chance in the primary with Dean
and couldn't deliver him a single state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Kerry is a "gunner" too.
And I have no idea what the fuck Howard Dean has to do with this discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Dean pandered to the NRA and Kerry denounces them.
The pro assault weapons crowd has little power in the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Dean supported AWB renewal, too.
So as far as I can tell, their views on gun control are identical.

Please document an instance where Dean "pandered to the NRA."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. They have one power...
...they can stay home on election day. Is that your preference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7th_Sephiroth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. i'd call 911
but just tell em to bring a few bodybags,as i would call after emptying a few .50 cal. clips from my DE.50AE7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Someone breaks into my house, I gotta assume they're there to kill me.
Sorry if that's inhumane or whatever, but my and my family's safety comes long before a criminal's.

"I'd rather be judged by twelve of my peers than carried out by six."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7th_Sephiroth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. i agree with you
i dont even let cops in without calling the pricent and confirming thier real cops, due to a rash of home invasions in the mid 90's where these guys impersonated police perfectly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. How do you know it's not a drunk or an Alzheimers sufferer
Edited on Sun May-09-04 12:58 AM by billbuckhead
We all know what happens when one assumes. I'll always remember Clinton apologizing to the Japanese people for a Japanese college student going to costume party in Louisisana and going to the wrong house and being killed by a gun owner who assumed. BTW, Louisiana has one of the highest gunownership rates and one of the highest murder rates in the world. Someone who kills like that deserves to go to hell as much as any other murderer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Louisiana? Highest murder rates in the world?
Edited on Sun May-09-04 01:19 AM by FeebMaster
I'd like to see that one documented. :eyes:



on edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. It's an image of Marlon Brando portraying a gangster.
It's ironic that Dianne Feinstein's "prop" (but not really) AK-47 doesn't need to be handled safely, yet Slackmaster's avatar of an actor is an "inappropriate gangster."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. A mythical gangster at that
Edited on Sat May-08-04 12:26 PM by slackmaster
At least my avatar is a human being rather than a mindless machine.

A decent "progressive, liberal" Democrat in fact.

Bill, it would be nice if you would try to address the actual issues once in a while. The topic of this thread is how some people are willing to LIE to advance their agenda. Has it ever occurred to you that when someone repeats the same lie over and over and over that maybe, just MAYBE there is something fundamentally wrong with their position?

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. The real issue is try to get US crime at least down to other
"advanced' nations level not some sick inside baseball horseshit about what exactly constitutes a assault rifle. No EU or commonwealth nation or Japan lets these weapons of mass destruction to sold. This sicko country with the highest incarceration rate and the most murders per capita is the only one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I have to call a McFeeb's Law violation on that one
Edited on Sat May-08-04 02:15 PM by slackmaster
No small firearm qualifies as a "WMD".

And guess what, Bill: If you disregard ALL GUN CRIMES committed in the US we still have a much higher rate of criminal violence than most other economically and politically similar nations.

Could it be that the people have SOMETHING to do with our crime problem?

Has it escaped your notice that 10 years of the AWB haven't had a measurable effect on any meaningful measure of crime?

Is it possible that banning one type of gun or another isn't the answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Guns escalate crime and better guns make bigger crimes
It obvious to anyone without lead poisoning. Once assault weapons are allowed, what's next RPG's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. "Assault weapons" have no technical definition.
And as for "allowing them"...they were allowed all along. You make it seem as though the expiration of the AWB is going to plunge America into anarchic chaos. These weapons existed long before the rash of gun crime we've witnessed in the last 25 years. Any critical analysis would prove that the mechanical function of the weapons used by the criminals has less to do with the crime than socioeconomic factors. Semi-auto rifles have existed for a very long time.

In 1994, legislators decided to radically alter the "assault weapon" nomenclature to include semi-automatic weapons. These rifles were around before, and they are around after...all the "ban" did was hijack the terminology.

And they are doing it again, with the newly-invented term "assault pistol."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. I suppose it would be asking too much for you to provide some proof
Once assault weapons are allowed, what's next RPG's?

RPGs are heavily regulated, and I don't see anyone calling for them to become easier to obtain.

The problem with the "assault weapons" ban is that it doesn't address any real issues. There are plenty of firearms that are just as "good" as AWs in any respect you can name.

My point in this thread is that the whole AW ban is based on a deliberate deception, a blurring of the distinction between semiautomatic firearms and machineguns. It's all just propaganda, with no rational basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. "No EU or commonwealth nation or Japan lets these weapons of mass destruct
Norway, Finland, and Switzerland allow individuals to own select fire military carbines, rifles, and sub-machine guns. I'd hardly call them backward as these nations have a higher standard of living than the USA with a much lower aggragate crime rate.

Japan? Sure, it's safe, unless you find yourself accused of a crime. Japan has no due process procedures in it's criminal law; meaning that an accused must prove their own innocence without benefit of guaranteed legal counsel. Additionally, authorities may deny food, water, sleep, and bathroom breaks to an accused to extract a confession. If you want a Japanese model state, fine, but count me out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. What Gangster? That's Marlon Brando isn't it?
Typical mistake. He is an actor that portrayed a gangster in a Hollywood movie. By the way, the "gun violence in movies isn't real either.

BWAAAAAAA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. An excellent book, made into a first-rate movie
A rare incident in Hollywood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. it's Marlon Brando glamorizing a gangster
and glamorizing crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Holy shit.
That was possibly the saddest whimpering post I've ever seen.

I shudder to think of what your utopia looks like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Have you ever read Mario Puzo's novel or seen the movie
Edited on Sat May-08-04 04:32 PM by slackmaster
The Godfather?

I can't recall ever getting the impression that the creators intended to glamorize the people or their crimes in any way.

The fictional Vito Corleone was the product of a tragic violent childhood in a sickeningly violent culture. He was tragic, his victims were tragic, all of his children and spouses and grandchildren and associates were tragic. There are no heroes in any of the Godfather movies. They're all horrifying and zero glorifying.

Maybe you're talking about some other work of fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. If you're into fiction, I recommend the CSGV.
They spin a hell of a yarn there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot Donating Member (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. What do you expect
from the scummy, anti gun-rights crowd? :P

Trying to blur the general public's distinction between Class III firearms and "assault weapons" is as old as the "assault weapon" debate itself.

Maybe I should take the author out groundhog hunting with my AR-15 and let him try to convice me that it is no good for hunting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
35. What a challenge, shooting "whistle pigs"
Whistle and they stand up. That has to be the hunting version of self gratification. The other green meat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. You hunt them because they are a nuisance.
Not for self-gratification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot Donating Member (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. You are so right
Edited on Sun May-09-04 09:43 AM by WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
Hitting something the size of a coke can at 300+ yards is just oh so easy.

Could you manage a 300+ yard hit on a coke can taking into account wind drift, bullet drop and mirage with a puny .22 caliber bullet? I don't mean 1 hit out of a box of ammunition either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. A groundhog is the size of soda can? Are you shooting baby groundhogs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. More gun-control arguments based on...
lies, distortion, and sensationalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC