Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Horror as two men and a woman shot at South Dakota Wild West-style shootout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 04:36 PM
Original message
Horror as two men and a woman shot at South Dakota Wild West-style shootout
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2005239/Three-tourists-shot-South-Dakota-Wild-West-shootout.html

Three tourists have been shot while watching a staged Wild West-style shootout.

Carrol Knutson, 65, from Birchwood, Minnesota, Jose Pruneda, 52, from Alliance, Nebraska, and John Ellis, 48, from South Connellsville Pennsylvania were all injured in the gun show in Hill City, South Dakota, according to Pennington County Sheriff's office.

It is thought Mr Ellis was shot twice in the incident.

All three were taken to Rapid City Regional Hospital last night. This morning Mr Prundeda had been discharged while the other two were in a 'fair' condition following surgery, officials said.

<more>


You mean they don't use blanks in those shoot 'em ups?

stupid
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. What the fuck were they doing?
Has to be asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. You can't pull a bullet back into a gun.
Just like you can't put spilled nuclear fuel back into a containment vessel. There are consequences to fooling around with both things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Did you read the story?
From the story:

"no bullets or fragments recovered."

Blanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. Yep. Blanks are dangerous things at close range.
The expanding column of hot gas coming out of the barrel can still hurt a person, despite there being no bullet, even smashing bone and tearing skin. On packages of rifle blanks they warn you not to use them within 20 feet of a person due to potential danger.

This sounds like a case where there was an insufficient minimum distance between the crowd and the performers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. 13 different news sources to choose from, and you choose the Daily Mail
It makes more work for us, because the Daily Mail is so unreliable that no-one can take its word for anything.

Please, everyone, whatever the news story, use another source if it's available. The Mail is right wing, and unreliable. More unreliable than Fox News, really.

The story from respectable sources:

http://www.kcautv.com/Global/story.asp?S=14933543 (AP)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/18/us-shootout-idUSTRE75H21V20110618

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13824907

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. just read your 3 sources as well as the original - did not see any differences
did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. No; the point is that the Mail is a right wing tabloid
and whenever you see a link to it, you should check the story with a real source. It's not that the Mail always lies; it's just that they frequently do.

It saddens me that anyone is looking at the Mail to find news stories. Think of a cross between Fox News and World Net Daily, and you've got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. It's not called the "Daily Fail" for nothing
The Mail is, in a sense, worse than a tabloid, because it has the pretense of not being one, despite being different only in not having a page 3 girl. Much like the Sun (and much of the British news media, honestly), the Mail is not above exaggerating or outright fabricating details to "sex up" a story.

You can go with a report from a British daily, as long as you bear in mind that they're all biased, and they all "pander to their readers' prejudices" (as Sir Humphrey Appleby put it) and adjust your level of credulity accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. To be fair the the OP, he's not actually looking at the Mail for news
What he's doing is google-searching "guns" to find a bunch of random stories about gun-related accidents or tragedies that he can dump into the forum. Where they actually come from is irrelevant to him, as far as anyone can tell... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. "It saddens me that anyone is looking at the Mail to find news stories"
But if that's what you find to fit your anti-gun agenda when you type guns into google, you will use whatever you can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Note the difference in headlines between the sources, by the way
The Daily Fail: "Horror as two men and a woman shot at South Dakota Wild West-style shootout"
The BBC: "South Dakota Wild West-style shootout leaves three hurt"
Local ABC affiliate KCAU: "Tourists injured during simulated SD shootout"

The BBC line is slightly better than the Mail one, in that it least doesn't create the false impression the shootings were fatal. The KCAU line, however, makes it clear from the outset that this wasn't an actual shootout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. A person who alleged to have been shot in the head in 2002 said...
...that their injury had been caused by "an overpacked blank". While there are an enormous number of firearms-related deaths in this country, and while mistakes or unprofessional handling of prop firearms has lead to at least 5-6 people that I'm aware of (on movie or TV sets), even something like this where the ammunition is a "blank" can be deadly.

Even a thin paraffin "cap" on the end of a bullet can still cause injury. They come out with such force that they are often used to break the stage glass between the shooter and the shootee in a "catch the bullet" illusion in magic.

As a person who witnessed a sloppily-executed "re-enactment" of firearms as a child it is unconscionable that anyone would fire guns like that (with blanks or whatever) so close to people. Dangerous in the extreme.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. True, blanks can be dicey even in the best of circumstances
When I was doing through basic training in the Dutch army, back in 1993, we were cautioned in the strongest terms against firing blanks at others at short ranges, because even with factory-produced blank rounds and a blank firing adaptor mostly blocking the muzzles of our rifles, it was not unheard of for hot power residue to come flying out (especially if there was oil left in the chamber or barrel from cleaning), which could result in facial or eye injury if it happened to strike the target there.

In a display like this, you're probably going to want to keep at least 30 feet between the participants, and you should never fire in the direction of an onlooker. That's just rule #2: "Never allow the muzzle to cover something you're not willing to destroy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. WOW, you're really reaching now. Slow day in the basement?
"You mean they don't use blanks in those shoot 'em ups?"

Do you even read the articles before you start spamming this forum? From the story:

" victims showed signs of wounds consistent with gunshots, but there were no bullets or fragments recovered."



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. why is that a reach? Didn't they still point those weapons at the tourists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. It's a reach because there's no evidence live rounds were used
Which would be why rl6214's post pertained entirely to jpak's insinuation that somebody did negligently load live rounds into one or more of the weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. ok - I get it - pointing a weapon at a bystander is ok if blanks are being used
got it
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Care to point out...
...where anybody other than yourself said any such thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. "It's a reach because there's no evidence live rounds were used"
Edited on Sun Jun-19-11 10:06 AM by DrDan
no concern (nor condemnation) that the guns were pointed at the on-lookers, is there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. I see multiple posts from before this one condemning what looks like the irresponsible
use of firearms (even with blanks). Including one from the poster you're responding to... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. I refer you to post #19 in this thread
Again, for the deliberately obtuse, rl6214's "reaching" statement was directed at jpak's closing remark in the OP:
You mean they don't use blanks in those shoot 'em ups?

The fact that blank rounds aren't quite as safe as the re-enactors evidently (and rather negligently) thought doesn't alter the fact that they were using blank rounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. "dress up in Wild West clothing and simulate the shootout while onlookers crowd round"
that is some pretty effective simulation if you ask me.

Even if it was a simulation with blanks, do the gun owners here support "shooting" at on-lookers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Why ask us?
It doesn't strike me as a particularly effective simulation, by the way; in a real gun battle, you'd expect bystanders to have the good sense to seek cover, not "crowd round."

And no, I for one do not support discharging blank rounds in even the general direction of bystanders at re-enactments, whether it's English Civil War, American Civil War, "Wild West" or anything involving blank-firing guns. In fact, as a gun owner, I'm more than a little leery of anything that involves aiming an actual firearm (capable of chambering and firing live rounds) at another human being, but presumably the participants themselves know the risks and have some measure of control over them (e.g. they're able to check each others' guns to ensure no live rounds are loaded).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. gotcha - the victims are to blame
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. "you'd expect bystanders to have the good sense to seek cover,"
you did write that, did you not?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Lol, way to take that completely out of context. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. how so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Yes, right after the words "in a real gun battle" (which this was not)
And that came immediately after an observation about the realism of the simulation. Note also my choice of punctuation: a semi-colon and a comma, rather than a period, let alone a paragraph break. I find it hard to believe you managed to get past grade school, let alone acquire a Ph.D. without being able to wrap your head around the idea that a single thought may be expressed in multiple clauses or sentences, and that you can't home in on one clause as if it were independent of the whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Murhpy's law
applies double to handguns. If anything can go wrong, it will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DonP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Give them the Brandon Lee and John Eric Hexxum award
Both killed themselves "accidentally" by playing with a gun loaded with "blanks".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. Brandon Lee most assuredly did NOT kill himself
The death was ruled to be accidental, and while attributed to negligence on the part of the film crew, no criminal charges were filed. Linda Lee Cadwell, Lee's mother, sued and settled out of court.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradon_Lee

http://www.snopes.com/movies/actors/brandonlee.asp

On March 31, 1993, while making The Crow, the crew filmed a scene in which his character walks into his apartment and discovers his fiancée being beaten and raped by thugs. Actor Michael Massee, who played one of the film's villains, was supposed to fire a pistol at Lee as he walked onto the scene.

Because the movie's second unit was running behind schedule, they decided to make dummy cartridges (cartridges that outwardly appear to be functional but contain no propellant or primers) from real cartridges by pulling out the bullets, dumping out the propellant and reinserting the bullets. However, the team neglected to remove the primers, which, if fired, could still produce just enough force to push the bullet out of the cartridge and into the barrel (a squib load). At some point prior to the fatal scene, the live primer in one of the improperly constructed dummy rounds was discharged by an unknown person while in the pistol, leaving the bullet stuck in the barrel.

This malfunction went unnoticed by the crew, and the same gun was later reloaded with blank cartridges and used in the scene in which Lee was shot. When the first blank cartridge was fired, the stuck bullet was propelled out of the barrel and struck Lee in the abdomen, lodging in his spine. He fell down instantly, and director Alex Proyas shouted "Cut!". When Lee did not get up, the cast and crew rushed to him and found that he was wounded. He was immediately rushed to the New Hanover Regional Medical Center in Wilmington by ambulance, but following a six-hour operation to remove the bullet, Lee was pronounced dead at 1:04 pm on March 31, 1993. He was 28 years old.




Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Time to ban tourist attractions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. this has been done every summer for many many years with no problems
It will be interesting to see what the rest of the story is. When we worked in Rapid and lived near Custer we had to drive through Hill City twice a day. In the summer (before the bypass was made) we would have to wait around 30 minutes every day for the shoot out to end and the road to open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. I went to this when I was 6 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. for balance
Around 3 a.m., a woman driving her one-year-old son pulled her vehicle into the garage of her home in Rancho Cordova, Calif. As the woman exited the car, two men who had followed her into the garage attacked, striking her in the head. Hearing the commotion, a male resident of the home retrieved a gun and came to the aid of the woman, exchanging gunfire with the attackers as the woman regained her bearings, got back in her car and escaped the violence by smashing through the garage door. As a result of the gun fight, the resident received a minor wound to his hip; one criminal was wounded severely, and the other was struck in the leg but fled the scene. Police captured both attackers a short time later.

Sacramento County Sherriff’s Department Spokesman Jason Ramos was supportive of the armed citizen’s actions, stating, “He defended his property and his woman and his kid… I guess you could describe it as heroic action. Things could be a lot worse for her and for the resident.” (The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, Calif. 06/17/11)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. Hill City, South Dakota... the Black Hills. Hell, I probably drove through there at least once
I checked the Rapid City Journal. Here's what I got:

Hill City shootout victims in fair condition



Home / News
Hill City shootout victims in fair condition

David Montgomery Journal staff | Posted: Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:32 am

The three people injured in Friday night's cowboy shootout gone wrong were all in fair or better condition Saturday morning.

The Pennington County Sheriff's Office identified the victims as Jose Pruneda of Alliance, Neb., Carrol Knutson of Birchwood, Minn., and John Ellis of South Connellsville, Penn. All three were taken to Rapid City Regional Hospital Friday night after being injured at a Hill City cowboy shootout they were observing.

As of around 10 a.m. Saturday morning, Pruneda has been discharged from the hospital. Knutson and Ellis were both in "fair" condition, which means conscious with stable vital signs.

Lt. Marty Graves of the sheriff's office said the investigation into the incident is still ongoing. Law enforcement personnel have confiscated the weapons involved in the shootout and are interviewing witnesses.

<more>

http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/news/article_23bca1a4-99d1-11e0-aef4-001cc4c002e0.html?mode=story

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
28. They are supposed to use simulated guns in those things.
For movies and such there are special plastic guns that look real but can't fire a real cartridge and take special blanks. Using those guns makes accidents like this impossible to happen. They should have known their business and used the right equipment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
33. Some horror! HAH
"A lot of people -- just kind of in shock and disbelief," Raderschadt said. "I didn't see a lot of ... anxious behavior, no panic. Just a lot of people wondering what was going on."

Shelley Bail, a waitress at the Hill City Cafe near the scene, said many people reacted not by running away but by running toward the incident to see what had happened.

Other witnesses laughed it off.

"People were kind of joking about it," Moni Matush, owner of the nearby Alpine Inn restaurant, said of witnesses who came into her restaurant after the incident. "I was almost sort of offended, thinking, ‘I think this is serious.' People were kind of giggling about it, saying, ‘They got shot at an Old West shootout in South Dakota.'"

http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/news/article_33ffaf52-9a3a-11e0-a0d2-001cc4c03286.html

Dumb accident yes - deadly probably not but yes it's better not to have happened at all. Bet it never will again with these reenactors. Probably just a wad blown out by an overcharge of powder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC