|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:43 PM Original message |
I've asked elsewhere here: Does this mean that all laws related to gun ownership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HALO141 (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. If that's what you think it means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. So they backed away from a lot of the issues like background checks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. The issue was DC's de facto total ban on handgun ownership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Then I don't see what all the fuss was about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HALO141 (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. This ruling was TREMENDOUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. It's good that they put out their interpretation. But, they did not really do anything about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. They couldn't do more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Good clarification. Now, they can be cited and maybe the background checks can be eliminated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virginia mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. No,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
23. "in their home" and elsewhere, i.e. "use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. Absolutely not. From page 54 of the majority opinion: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Thanks. Guys in my Sportsmen's Club say it didn't do anything and think it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Ask the guys in your sportsmans club this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Yep, but we still say that acquiring a gun (background checks, etc) means that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Background check hasn't stopped me from getting one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-27-08 05:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. I guess it prevents you from getting one if you are legally barred from having one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not by a long shot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. "Anyone can own a gun" who wants to protect themselves can have it is what I read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
9. There is a specific statement that says there is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. My point is that we still have laws about acquiring weapons, so no real progress was made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. To a resident of DC, the ruling is huge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. My friend, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Here's the part where they backed off of eliminating existing laws: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uberllama42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
14. Read the syllabus, item #2 on page 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greenvpi (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
24. The rulling was good for all sensible people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hooptie (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-27-08 08:56 AM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Licenses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0 (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-27-08 09:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. So you are in favor of requiring licensing for exercise of a right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PFunk (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
25. This is going to be revisited again folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
osperto (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-26-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Because gangs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-27-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. I think after the initial shock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeepnstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-27-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. How's that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-27-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Gang deaths won't force anything to be revisited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC