Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USSC Rules Against Duke Energy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 11:35 AM
Original message
USSC Rules Against Duke Energy
Edited on Thu Apr-05-07 11:39 AM by RestoreGore
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040407H.shtml


By PETE YOST


WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court dealt a setback to the utility industry Monday, supporting a federal clean air initiative aimed at forcing power companies to install pollution control equipment on aging coal-fired power plants. In a unanimous decision, the justices ruled against Duke Energy Corp. (DUK) in a lawsuit originally brought by the Clinton administration, part of a massive enforcement effort targeting more than a dozen utilities.

Most companies settled with the government, but several Clinton-era cases involving more than two dozen power plants in the South and the Midwest are still pending. The remaining suits demand fines for past pollution that, if levied in full, would run into billions of dollars.

The justices ruled that the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., overstepped its authority by implicitly invalidating 1980 Environmental Protection Agency regulations, interpreting them in a way that favored Duke Energy. The appeals court's decision "seems to us too far a stretch," Justice David Souter wrote. The 1980 regulations "may be no seamless narrative, but they clearly do not define" the law's requirements in the way the energy company interprets them, Souter wrote.

Duke vowed to continue the battle in the lower courts, saying that the question it lost on in the Supreme Court was a narrow one. The company expressed confidence it will be able to demonstrate that its plants are not subject to the requirements of the program called New Source Review. "We continue to believe we have solid defenses against the government's claims," said Marc Manly, Duke Energy group executive and chief legal officer.

The decision will help protect the health of millions of Americans harmed by industrial air pollution, said Sean H. Donahue lead legal counsel in the case for Environmental Defense and other environmental petitioners.

end of excerpt
---
Another good ruling. And no NEW coal fired power plants should be built without a way to capture carbon. And yet Duke Energy still speaks against this planet by putting profit over human health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC