Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Send more carcinogens, via cut flowers, to friends or cancer victims?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:25 PM
Original message
Send more carcinogens, via cut flowers, to friends or cancer victims?
When I saw this brouhaha about some ill-thought out, unauthorized DU flower drive to send uncounted numbers of cut roses to Mrs. Edwards, my first thought was, don't any of these dewy-eyed enthusiasts know ANYTHING about the environmental dangers and impacts of imported flowers? Evidently not. So I'm giving you that information below.

And of course, any cut flowers, even organic ones are a major time-consuming gift to receive and care for, and even more so if one has to organize the redelivery of same to some hospital, etc., where the flowers are also a time-consuming gift. Every single stem should be cut at an angle and immediately placed in a vase of hot water into which flower preservative has been dissolved (great, more chemicals). If you do that, AND change the water after 3 days, the flowers may last a week. The petals fall off, the water stinks, and you have to clean up and dispose of dead flowers. If you want to send flowers, send locally, organically grown ones. That will eliminate ANY roses, because they are not seasonal at the moment. Even when they ARE seasonal, they will not be available at your local florists because organic roses don't have those long straight stems and are not uniformly shaped, and just plain are not price competitive. There are many thoughtful actions which can be taken and/or gifts made in the name of Mrs. Edwards. Imported, cut flowers, are not among them.

www.wisegeek.com/are-cut-flowers-bad-for-the-environment.htm

Many people like to celebrate major holidays with lavish bouquets of cut flowers. As a result, the flower industry is booming, shipping hundreds of tons of cut flowers all over the world for sale in supermarkets and at florists. Consumers spend millions every year purchasing cut flowers and bringing them into their homes: and most consumers do not think about the environmental and social aspects of the cut flower industry. Several studies conducted in the late 1990s suggested that cut flowers had a serious environmental impact, and some advocacy organizations have attempted to raise consumer awareness about the hidden costs of cut flowers.

Most cut flowers are grown in South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia in large greenhouse environments staffed by underpaid, non-unionized workers. The greenhouses are carefully climate controlled to yield the best cut flowers, and they are also heavily sprayed with pesticides, fungicides, and herbicides. Because cut flowers are grown in nations with more lax environmental laws, many banned substances including DDT and methyl-bromide are used in flower production. These substances have a profound impact on the health of the workers: many suffer from health problems such as skin conditions, respiratory problems, impaired vision, and birth defects thanks to their exposure to these chemicals.

In addition to hurting the workers, these chemicals are also extremely harmful for the environment. Methyl-bromide has been linked with destruction of the ozone layer, for example, while DDT usage worldwide led to serious problems for many animal and bird populations. Most greenhouses which produce cut flowers dump chemicals on their crops in large amounts. These chemicals later enter the bodies of workers, the flowers, and the ground water. Water pollution around commercial greenhouses hurts animal and fish populations and also has an impact on human life as well, by reducing the amount of drinkable water.

Once the flowers are grown, they still must be shipped to a final destination, greatly contributing to global pollution. Some cut flowers may be shipped thousands of miles, adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere at every step of the way. At the florist, the flowers are arranged and prepared for sale, and some florists have complained of skin and other health problems as a result of prolonged contact with cut flowers. Finally, the consumer brings the flowers home, perhaps tossing them carelessly into a shopping cart laden with organic, fair trade produce and other food stuffs.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like we're down to sending Olive Garden gift certificates.
Or sackcloth. Sackcloth is always nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
62. Yes but...
is Olive Garden organic? Perhaps a cup of water and a biscuit would be more appropriate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. NOw that you've had your sanctimonious rant, you really should
know.... our previous flower campaigns have utilized ORGANIC roses....:eyes:

We aren't all stupid, you know....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That sounds great - I've never seen organic roses in my area.
Please provide a link for where to get organic roses in the States. Of course, you still have the shipping issue - pollution wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Helderheid provides it in the post below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. see post 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Organic or not...
anyone give any thought to the work of receiving, arranging and disposing of said organics you'll be dumping on Elizabeth? She specifically asked for donations to the campaign. Anyone unwilling to do that can contribute to their charity of choice in her name. I really think that either choice would result in a more lasting & meaningful tribute than dozens of dead flowers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. that's a valid question... but if some people want to give ORGANIC
flowers, other to donate to the campaign or to the American Cancer Society in her name, or something else, what's the harm?

I was reacting to the tone of the OP...We all may be "dewy eyed," per the post, but I think there are countless means of working together to show our appreciation and support to Elizabeth & John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. We sent organic flowers to Helen Thomas:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Wow! $50.00 for a dozen roses which will last a week?
So, send ONE dozen, and donate the rest of DU $$$$ to something lasting and meaningful in Mrs. Edwards' name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. So organic isn't the issue? We got a discount and the roses were shared with soldiers at Walter Reed
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 05:45 PM by helderheid
http://pdamerica.org/articles/chapters/ut-2006-04-13.php

http://web.archive.org/web/20060503225108/http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/033006/thomas.html

"Blessed are the peacemakers. The bounty of beautiful roses from such wonderful people has lifted my heart and will remain in my memory for the rest of my life. Thank you for caring that others may live." - Helen Thomas to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Good times, h!
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. VERY good times!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. sniff...sniff...

tears o' joy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. The OP made several points, one of which was re organic.
Having spent time visiting nursing homes & hospitals, and with Hospice Volunteers to nursing homes (cuz I'm SUCH a nasty person), I have seen flowers delivered to the front desks and sit there for hours or overnight before being put in someone's room. The staff do not have time to put the flowers in fresh water, let alone recut the stems, etc., so the flowers tend to die in about three days and sit there rotting another several days before the janitors throw them out. And you know what, Walter Reed was far more understaffed than any of the places I visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. and probably all great points. It's just that whole flies to honey argument I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. A suggestion, Divernan...
I'm betting that no one would have reacted badly to your OP if you had phrased it as a suggestion and that you wanted to make sure that everyone knew some of the downsides of routinely purchased cut flowers. That would have been a welcome element to the discussions--even among those of use who (as you say) are "dewy eyed enthusiasts"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. My family sends live plants/trees to each other.
My 2 daughters, 1 son and I are all lifelong gardeners - from a line of farmers. One of us is limited to pots of plants on her fire escape landing, another to drought resistant plants that can survive her lengthy business trips; another has completely landscaped his yard with native plants.
My son, the environmentalist, alerted us to the cut-imported-flower issue back in the mid-90's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. "...dewy-eyed enthusiasts ..."? That's insulting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
47. No, it means innocently trusting or naively sentimental.
and if anyone wishes to disagree with the points from the link I provided and from which I quoted, fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm the dewey eyed enthusiast who started it all. It was authorized.
Now can I come to your house and make sure that everything you do and use is 100% green? That'd be great. Thx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. So have you placed a limit on the number of roses you're sending?
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 05:43 PM by Divernan
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I hope the limit is a Brazilian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. blahahaha!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. Still waiting for a response-have you placed a limit on how many roses?
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 06:21 PM by Divernan
THX.

On edit: I just went back to your thread and read through all of it. There was no mention of sending ORGANIC roses, although you did express your desire to sent "a boatload" of roses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
55. Well, damn them to hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
61. Given the accusatory tone of your post,, why would she
respond? Don't take part, for heaven sakes. No one has a gun to your head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. How pathetic and nasty. Go rain on someone else's parade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
42. And would it be pathetic and nasty to warn of the dangers of puppy mills?
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 06:20 PM by Divernan
Aren't you a vet? So if I warned people about the heath issues of puppy mills (and we have a lot in my state - we're trying to legislate against them) would that mean I hate dogs? And when I posted about the petfood recalls, was I advocating starving animals? NO! Don't feed your animals poisoned food, and don't send people chemically contaminated flowers. I truly saw NO reference to buying ORGANIC roses in the earlier thread I read about sending flowers. If it was there I missed it.

And I don't think the term "dewy-eyed" is anywhere near as harsh a label as pathetic or nasty. The official definition of it is: innocently trusting or naively sentimental. So I called someone trusting and sentimental, and you called me pathetic and nasty? Hmmmmmm.

On edit: I just went back to the two threads advocating sending roses. There was NO mention of the fact that the roses would be organic - although the OPer did advocate sending a "boatload" of roses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. IBTL!!! IBTL!!!
Please...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. that hairshirt is binding, is it not?
i mean shit -- FLOWERS! i cannot fucking beeeeelieeeeeeve i just read a post DEMONIZING FLOWERS.

there's good and bad sources of EVERYTHING you consume. unless you've grown it in your backyard, chances are it traveled more than 50 miles to get to your house.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. And there have been posts demonizing LIGHT BULBS !
Here's the deal, every grain of sand counts. There are good and bad light bulbs, and there are good and bad flowers. I bet you didn't even read the material I posted about the environmental impacts -no one has disputed those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. i'm not giving up incandescent light either -- i must be SATAN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. If every grain of sand counts, how many grains of nasttyness and negativity
did you just dump onto the beach?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. eggggsactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. I swear people actively search for crap to bitch about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. I recommended this because people need to hear it.
Sure some good, well-meaning people are going to find this upsetting, but they need to be confronted with the hard truth about 'ethical consumption' and lunacy of flying flowers around the country and even the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Thank you, That was my purpose too.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. And the timing is perfect...
so that all people pay attention. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. You make valid points
Good luck with the people sticking fingers in ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. no, he assumed we are all too stupid to go for organic flowers...
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 06:00 PM by hlthe2b
You would have a better appreciation for that, if you had read the earlier posts.
All the OP succeeded in, was insulting and patronizing fellow DUers.


It is fine to suggest alternative ways to honor Elizabeth, but can't we do so without denigrating the efforts of (supposed) "dewy eyed" members? A little less sanctimony, a little bit more respect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
57. Do show me any mention in earlier posts of ORGANIC flowers.
I couldn't find any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DawgHouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
36. Sounds like somebody needs a hug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. hee hee!
:grouphug: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
37. Pardon me, but,
are you aware that the toilet paper you consume was once a growing, living, beautiful, tree?
I advise you to stop.

:rofl: :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. What's this toilet paper of which I've heard rumors? Since Sears topped publishing
their catalogs and Montgomery Ward is no longer in business, I have wondered what to do.

This toilet paper; I have heard of it. Perhaps I will give it a try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Why use toilet paper... isn't that what the three sea shells are for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. I can't believe some of the responses you're getting
the immaturity level is astonishing.

I'm really glad you weighed in on this. It's a showy gesture, a lovely IDEA, and the reality is something quite different, I agree. I myself adore flowers -- but I literally hate bringing them into the house from my garden (because they are SO demanding and so messy if not properly cared for) or receiving them in a commercial bouquet.

I hope people listen to you and find some other way to honor and support poor Mrs. Edwards -- like maybe contributions to cancer RESEARCH? Or contributions that would help insolvent cancer victims get the care she can? Or contributions to the Poverty Center he founded? Or contributions to some scholarship fund at their alma mater. Or ANYthing else. Even contributions to her husband's campaign would be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. You too can make a polite suggestion...
without accusing everyone else who disagrees with you of being "immature." That's why the OP is getting so many angry responses. They essentially accused the "dewy eyed enthusiast" organizer of the flower idea of wanting to send carcinogens and being irresponsible environmentally to even consider flowers.

In fact many of us have suggested alternatives. That's fine. Being rude to others who make a suggestion you disagree with, is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. Use an online dictionary. The OP did not call anyone IMMATURE.
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 06:25 PM by Divernan
Dewy-eyed means innocently trusting or naively sentimental. My assumption was that if people were educated about carcinogens on cut flowers, they would NOT send them. I just went back and read through every line of the threads which prompted me to post a new thread. There was NO mention that the flowers would be organic. There was a desire expressed by the orignator of the drive to send a "boatload" of flowers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. DIvernan, you are responding to a posted response to # 39
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 06:56 PM by hlthe2b
by Morgan LeFay.... That particular poster DOES use the term "immature."

Perhaps you should take a deep breath and apologize for the tone of your original post. Obviously the majority of people here DID take offense. You keep just digging in deeper. You had an original valid point, but your condescending tone to the post was offensive. Now your defensiveness has you responding to posts that aren't even addressed to you...Let it go, for heaven's sakes...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #44
64. Terribly sorry
but I found many of the responses IMMATURE. Period. I'm entitled to HAVE tht opinion, and I'm entitled to post it.

Someone else responded to your silly take on "dewey-eyed" which, if you were correct, would be the FIRST time I ever saw the term used as an insult But you're not correct. It connotes idealism, and also to me youthfulness.

If you're insulted by the OP I don't know what to tell you. He had some really great points, and I wish the organizers would think the thing through. I HATE seeing that much money not put to better use than that. It's, well, sorry but it's immature. Idealistic and immature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
40. I have to agree, while the flower drive is well-meaning it is not the best thing we could do...
Believe me Elizabeth Edwards is going to have far more flowers than she knows what to do with, and they will all die within a week anyways. Giving to a cancer charity is a far better option, as that money can be used to help a lot of people.

I know those sending flowers mean well, but I think there are much better ways to show support for Elizabeth than overwhelming her with flowers that she does not have the time to care for.

























Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
41. I don't know what to make of this thread. If you don't want to do
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 06:06 PM by sfexpat2000
the flower gesture, just don't.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. exactly..... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. amazing, idnit?
demanding? if i get flowers, and i don't take the best care of them, they do not say a damn thing. they just wilt politely, silently, and i toss them on the compost pile. besides which, i'm pretty sure elizabeth has some help around the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
huskerlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
48. While the content of your message
is important, and perhaps you were well meaning, the way you phrased your post was condescending and uncalled for.

We have organized a couple of flower-related gifts in the past, and to assume that the people behind them didn't know enough (or care enough) to go organic is ridiculous.

Thinking that sending flowers isn't the best idea is perfectly fine. But you do not have to be rude about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. Those are my thoughts,
but you worded it more maturely than I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. Well said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
52. Thanks for that information OP.
Never thought of flowers in that light before. The only ones I'm going to bring in the house are going to be from my own garden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
54. Thanks for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
59. ZOMG! THEY'RE PROBABLY GMO FLOWERS TOO!
Hey, let's see if we can relate chemtrails and gardasil to somebody actually dying of cancer too!

Isn't that tactful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
60. Even if the pesticides are not banned it doesn't mean that they're safe
and I react to most flowers with neurological effects, i.e. disorientation, difficulty concentrating, joint pain. Lots of people are sensitized to neurotoxic pesticides.

But my point is that many pesticides are extremely dangerous. The companies that manufacture them lie too about what's inside the product. An example of this industry's predisposition to lying egregiously: the industry calls most of the ingredients in a pesticide "inert ingredients" even though they can be highly toxic.

Some of the so called "inert ingredients" are extremely dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wackadoo wabbit Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
63. Flowers may not be the best gift to give to a cancer survivor
When you have cancer, it's incredibly important to keep your immune system as strong and as untaxed as possible. Many people have allergies, and even organic roses can cause problems for some people, as roses are a common allergen.

Lest you think I'm talking out of my ass, let me tell you a story from personal experience: My husband has leukemia; he also has allergies to many substances, including roses. If someone, no matter how well-meaning, were to give us flowers, we would thank them kindly and then immediately dispose of the flowers. The beauty of the flowers would not be worth the stress on his immune system.

Elizabeth Edwards has indicated that she would prefer donations to her husband's campaign. Doesn't it make more sense to give her the gift she prefers?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC