Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VT: House Passes Labeling Bill for GE Seeds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
theoceansnerves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 04:59 AM
Original message
VT: House Passes Labeling Bill for GE Seeds
MONTPELIER, VT - April 8 - The Vermont House of Representatives voice-voted on final passage to endorse the Farmer’s Right-to-Know Seed Labeling Bill (H-777) today, an act defining ‘genetically engineered’ seeds as different from conventional seeds in the state of Vermont seed statute, and mandating the labeling of all genetically engineered seeds sold in the state. The bill goes back to the Senate next week for confirmation of final changes, before going to Governor Douglas for final approval and enactment. Today’s overwhelming yes vote comes as the Vermont Senate has unanimously approved the Farmer Protection Act in March, and 79 Vermont towns have passed Town Meeting measures calling on lawmakers in Montpelier and Washington enact a moratorium on genetically engineered crops.

Representative Floyd Nease (D-Johnson) reported out the bill, explaining that this act is intended to “avoid potential adverse affects on biological diversity from use of GE seeds.” Nease noted that the bill proscribes labeling of GE seeds by the manufacturer, which can either print or attatch a tag reading “GE” on the seed packets. Responsibility for this labeling rests with seed manufacturers, not Vermont retailers, unless retailers package and market their own GE seeds. Section four of the bill also requires seed manufacturers to report on GE seed sales to the Agency of Agriculture in addition to general seed sales reporting.

“This bill is a step in the right direction. It gives consumers, both farmers and gardeners, the option of choices. I hope we will also, some day, get to vote to protect all of our farms from the economic consequences that may result from the contamination of seeds,” said Representative David Zuckerman (P-Burlington), referring to the Farmer Protection Act, a bill awaiting action in the House Natural Resources Committee, on which he sits.

“The key piece of the Farmer’s Right to Know Act defines genetically engineered seeds and plants as different from conventional varieties. This bucks the industry’s claim that GE is the same as conventional, and therefore doesn’t require any additional regulation. This bill is the first of its kind in the US, and destabilizes the whole premise of ‘substantial equivalence,’ which informs GMO policy at every level,” said Amy Shollenberger, Policy Director at Rural Vermont.

http://www.commondreams.org/news2004/0409-08.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AbsolutMauser Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL
Where does the industry get a claim that GE is the same as conventional seeds? I've never heard anything so insane.

But anyway, isn't this more of a protective measure for farmers than it is an environmental action? You have GE seeds which lead to higher crop yield, meaning fewer farmers can produce more food. By providing farmers (especially cooperatives) the ability to use the lower producing conventional seeds, they essentially lower supply.

Of course, I am disregarding the environmental impact of improved GE species which could take over natural ones, but the "economic consequences" of "contamination" seem to be lower prices due to greater yield than some sort of concern for the environment.

~AbM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. your wrong

It's about choice and you can't make a choice if
you don't have the information.

Many people do not believe in GE and don't want to support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoceansnerves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. protective
yes protective if you mean it protects the farmers from getting sued by monsanto for unknowingly planting ge seeds without paying them for the privilege of using them. of course, this still doesn't protect them if some happen to drift onto their farm. it also in general just makes it easier to choose a conventional seed, for -whatever- reason you so choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rawtribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Percy Schmeiser

is a farmer from Bruno, Saskatchewan Canada whose Canola fields were contaminated with Monsanto's Round-Up Ready Canola. Monsanto's position is that it doesn't matter whether Schmeiser knew or not that his canola field was contaminated with the Roundup Ready gene and that he must pay their Technology Fee.

http://www.percyschmeiser.com/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoceansnerves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. yup
that's exactly what i was referring to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC