Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Radioactive Steam Escapes From Ill. Plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:06 PM
Original message
Radioactive Steam Escapes From Ill. Plant
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/nat-gen/2006/apr/07/040709044.html

GODLEY, Ill. (AP) - Steam containing radioactive tritium escaped from a valve at an Exelon Corp. plant even as company officials met with local residents to discuss efforts to clean up earlier leaks.

About 500 gallons of water pooled on the grounds of the Braidwood Generating Station as the steam condensed Thursday, and some of it flowed into a ditch that lies between the plant and the village of Godley, company spokesman Craig Nesbit told the Chicago Tribune for a story on its Web site.

Tests showed no detectable levels of tritium in the water in the ditch, although levels measured in the water pooled on plant grounds were more than twice federal drinking and groundwater limits, Nesbit said. He said more precise testing would be conducted.

<snip>

The Braidwood plant, located about 60 miles southwest of Chicago, has sent millions of gallons of tritium-tainted water into the ground in several leaks dating back to 1996. When Thursday's release happened, Exelon officials were meeting with residents to discuss plans to clean up earlier leaks.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xeric Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. no problem......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tritium?!? Has Doctor Octopus been seen in the vicinity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. no problem--that plant is east of me
but i`ve got one to the north and west of me...maybe i should be worried?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. What's the problem? Cancer is treatable!
"Tritium is a radioactive form of hydrogen commonly found in ground water but is more concentrated in water used in nuclear reactors. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, exposure to tritium increases the risk of developing cancer."


Hell, this stuff is found in the environment what's a few more roentgens gonna hurt? Barely more than backround. NO problemo!

"Uh, how come your face is on sideways?"









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. A condensed AP article from the Las Vegas Sun?
We can do better than that. How 'bout these:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/southsouthwest/chi-0604070302apr07,1,6235166.story?coll=chi-newslocalssouthwest-hed
http://www.epa.state.il.us/community-relations/fact-sheets/exelon-braidwood/exelon-braidwood-2.html
http://www.epa.state.il.us/community-relations/fact-sheets/exelon-braidwood/exelon-braidwood-1.html

It might be reasonable to compare the amounts of radiocactive tritium released at Braidwood to the normal toxic releases of a coal fired power plant, and the mines that feed it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. or from the uranium mines, mills, enrichment plants
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 03:54 PM by jpak
and fuel fabrication facilities too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree. Hard Numbers.
But I rarely agree with you that radioactive toxins are qualitatively any different than other sorts of toxins. They are sequestered or transported in the environment by the same mechanisms that sequester and transport non-radioactive toxins.

Things like mercury are toxic too, and they have a "half life" of forever. Perhaps most importantly in these discussions, the CO2 we spew into the atmosphere certainly doesn't "decay" fast enough, and the rising levels of CO2 in the oceans are very alarming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC