Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debunking gas boycott days (weekly and/or sporadic one-day events)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 09:31 AM
Original message
Debunking gas boycott days (weekly and/or sporadic one-day events)
Edited on Fri Sep-02-05 09:32 AM by BlueEyedSon
There are people who still think that single-day boycotts are effective at one or more of the following:

lowering prices
decreasing consumption
penalizing oil companies

Let's face it, in the long run lowering per-capita (and hopefully national total) consumption is all that matters. As far as personal transportation, there are some well known strategies:

get a more efficient car (a hybrid, small-displacement TDI)
bike and/or walk
rideshare/carpool
use mass transit
don't use your car 1 day per week
combine/plan trips (shopping, commuting, picking up the kids)

I think gas boycotts are actually COUNTERPRODUCTIVE because well-meaning people will participate in them BELIEVING that they are doing something effective, when in fact they are not. So people are wasting their time, feel good, and will not seek further to the REAL solutions. Gas boycotts are a personal political placebo.

Snopes has a very good explanation of why gas boycotts do not and cannot work.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/nogas.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice post. I've gotten one of those emails
many many times and it always struck me a ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. You cannot boycott a necessity. Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. DOH! (smacks head).... but can we make it LESS necessary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. A boycott means not buying any. Not less.
Conservation is always a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I guess thats my point. No boycotts, less consumption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC